Biden has pulled out of 2024 Presidential election race. What next?

[Danderman123]

3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Was it a good day, or was it just all the donors that withheld their contributions because it was Joe, now sending the same amount they would have donated anyway?

No, the big haul was small dollar donations.

 

 

[Danderman123]

There's already talk of replacing JD Vance with Nikki Haley.

[frank83628]

43 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

They had informants among the kidnappers, but they didn't run the show.

maybe not but still involved it would seem, probably why it didn't get massive media coverage.

[newnative]

On 7/22/2024 at 3:34 AM, rattlesnake said:

 

Trump would tear her to shreds in a debate.

     Maybe--but only because Trump doesn't debate at a debate.  Instead, no matter what debate question is asked, he spits out different parts of his campaign stump speech.  Go back to the first debate and check his answer to the child care question.  The whole 'debate' on his part was much the same.   At some point I just stopped watching.

     I'll be the very first to say that it was effective, what I watched.  And, more entertaining for the great unwashed than an actual debate can sometimes be, listening to facts supporting a debate argument.  Lies can be so much more fun, can't they?   If the debate had actually been scored as a debate, he would have narrowly lost.  But, he won big by being the most entertaining in spinning his tried and true lies.  Sadly, such is American politics in the 21st century.

    Lazy Trump ddn't actually even have to do any prep for the debate--just remember his stump speech.   Poor Biden was actually debating, or trying to.  He should have immediately pivoted and followed Trump's lead--disregard the debate question and, instead, throw out some choice parts of his stump speech dealing with Trump's lies and misdeeds.   

    Should Harris choose to debate Trump, she needs to go on the attack first, ignore most debate questions, and put Trump on the defense from the get-go.   She can always start each response by saying, "I'll get to that question if I have time but I'd first like to address the lie my opponent has been telling regarding___________. "   Go get him.

[rattlesnake]

8 minutes ago, newnative said:

     Maybe--but only because Trump doesn't debate at a debate.  Instead, no matter what debate question is asked, he spits out different parts of his campaign stump speech.  Go back to the first debate and check his answer to the child care question.  The whole 'debate' on his part was much the same.   At some point I just stopped watching.

     I'll be the very first to say that it was effective, what I watched.  And, more entertaining for the great unwashed than an actual debate can sometimes be, listening to facts supporting a debate argument.  Lies can be so much more fun, can't they?   If the debate had actually been scored as a debate, he would have narrowly lost.  But, he won big by being the most entertaining in spinning his tried and true lies.  Sadly, such is American politics in the 21st century.

    Lazy Trump ddn't actually even have to do any prep for the debate--just remember his stump speech.   Poor Biden was actually debating, or trying to.  He should have immediately pivoted and followed Trump's lead--disregard the debate question and, instead, throw out some choice parts of his stump speech dealing with Trump's lies and misdeeds.   

    Should Harris choose to debate Trump, she needs to go on the attack first, ignore most debate questions, and put Trump on the defense from the get-go.   She can always start each response by saying, "I'll get to that question if I have time but I'd first like to address the lie my opponent has been telling regarding___________. "   Go get him.

 

She is so bad at debating that she dropped out of the 2019 primary race with less than 1% of voting intentions.

[Paris333]

What does Project 2025 propose? Donald Trump
Project 2025 was orchestrated by the Heritage Foundation and other conservative groups before Trump officially entered the race.
The Heritage Foundation is a think tank that has had a catalytic influence on the policies implemented by Republican administrations since the Reagan era.
Much of the nearly 900-page manifesto details extreme policies and changes to the structure of the federal government. Among other things, Project 2025 presents plans to criminalize pornography, dissolve the Commerce and Education ministries, reject abortion as health care, and abandon climate protection policies.
He also supports the deployment of the military "to assist in apprehension operations" along the US-Mexico border.

Source:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

 

Kamala Harris regime

The Democrats regime represent the "Woke" agenda (basically this is the infamous "Agenda 2030" of the authoritarian system that Klaus Schwab appears to have created), especially with the "left"😄 Kamala Harris😄 as a candidate, and the Donald Trump Republicans who represent the traditional values and patriotism.

Source:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke#:~:text=Woke is a political slang,and denial of LGBT rights.

 

Source:

https://usdebtclock.org/

 

For comparison reasons globally we have Belgian origin Ursula von der Leyen gynecologist new elected Europe President in July 2024 vs against future U.S.A President Donald Trump...........

 

Kamala Harris tells migrants 'do not come' during talks in Guatemala
 

[impulse]

You guys that stick to the MSM and ignore the wingnut media are missing out.

 

Reminds me of that scene in Men in Black, where Agent K picks up the National Enquirer.

 

I'd start with vigilantnews.com right now.

 

And no.  I don't agree with most of their analysis.  But they are a great starting point if you want to follow the links, and follow those links.

 

 

[Yellowtail]

16 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Biden has COVID.

Jane Fonda calls coronavirus ‘God’s gift to the left’ (thehill.com)

[metisdead]

Grammar police troll posts and the associated replies contravening our Community Standards have been removed.

[HappyExpat57]

Here's a thought:

Joe has 6 months left and complete immunity. How should he take adventage of that wonderful supreme court decision?

[theblether]

10 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Was the sources your presenting come from QAnon or Newsmax or both?

 

Drivel. 

 

You would need to be a seriously demented cultish troll of the first order if you believe - even for one minute - that Biden will leave Hunter languishing in jail when he exits the White House. 

 

And remember, Hunter has already offered a guilty plea for the tax fraud charges. His plea deal was rejected. He's as guilty as sin. It's only a question of sentencing now.  

[Yellowtail]

23 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Here's a thought:

Joe has 6 months left and complete immunity. How should he take adventage of that wonderful supreme court decision?

Clearly you do not understand the immunity case, but he could try closing the border, start compiling with court rulings, and quit lying would be a nice start. 

 

Oh, and he might as well pardon his criminal family members. 

[Rimmer]

An inflammatory troll post has been removed

[newnative]

3 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

She is so bad at debating that she dropped out of the 2019 primary race with less than 1% of voting intentions.

Even better then for her to 'debate' the same way as Trump.

[Yellowtail]

18 minutes ago, newnative said:

Even better then for her to 'debate' the same way as Trump.

You mean let Trump pick the venue, dates, rules and moderators the way Biden did? I think that's a great idea. As a seasoned prosecutor, Harris will cream that stupid old, demented Trump. 

[newnative]

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You mean let Trump pick the venue, dates, rules and moderators the way Biden did? I think that's a great idea. As a seasoned prosecutor, Harris will cream that stupid old, demented Trump. 

Sure, and then completely ignore the debate rules, exactly like Trump in the first debate.  

[Yellowtail]

Just now, newnative said:

Sure, and then completely ignore the debate rules, exactly like Trump in the first debate.  

What rules did Trump ignore? I know Biden said he was yelling, but that was just Biden lying. 

 

I watched it, it was split-screen, and Trump was not yelling over Biden. 

[newnative]

7 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What rules did Trump ignore? I know Biden said he was yelling, but that was just Biden lying. 

 

I watched it, it was split-screen, and Trump was not yelling over Biden. 

      Answered in my earlier post.  To recap, he didn't debate, he mostly didn't answer the moderator questions, and, instead, gave chunks of his stump speech.  As I said, Harris should do the same thing if she 'debates' him.  No sense following the rules when Trump doesn't.  

[Yellowtail]

8 minutes ago, newnative said:

      Answered in my earlier post.  To recap, he didn't debate, he mostly didn't answer the moderator questions, and, instead, gave chunks of his stump speech.  As I said, Harris should do the same thing if she 'debates' him.  No sense following the rules when Trump doesn't.  

So, you were lying when you said he broke the rules, that's what I thought.

 

There were no rules about what they could or could not say. Are you going to argue Biden was better? 

 

But as I said, I think CNN intentionally did Biden in with the split-screen. That face is what really killed Biden. 

 

 

[newnative]

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, you were lying when you said he broke the rules, that's what I thought.

 

There were no rules about what they could or could not say. Are you going to argue Biden was better? 

 

But as I said, I think CNN intentionally did Biden in with the split-screen. That face is what really killed Biden. 

 

 

    Not lying, of course he broke the rules.  Get real.   The moderators were horrible letting him hijack what was suppose to be a debate and turn it into just another campaign stop.  My point is Harris needs to do the same thing if they 'debate' because Trump's just going to do it all over again.  

[Danderman123]

9 hours ago, G_Money said:

What part of the speech or debate I quoted were those remarks?  I must of gone to the head.

 

Even so everyone has a blunder OCCASIONALLY.  You, me and everyone else here.

 

With Joe , it’s consistent.  
 

You know that but refuse to acknowledge.  That’s the first sign.  

Neither you nor I know how the public is going to respond to Kamala Harris as the Dem nominee. 

 

It's going to take a few weeks for the polling to inform us of the status of the race. I don't claim to know how the race will shape up, right now.

 

What I do know is that the selection of JD Vance has been overcome by events, and there is pressure on Trump to dump Vance.

 

 

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, newnative said:

    Not lying, of course he broke the rules.  Get real.   The moderators were horrible letting him hijack what was suppose to be a debate and turn it into just another campaign stop.  My point is Harris needs to do the same thing if they 'debate' because Trump's just going to do it all over again.  

Can you inform us what rules were broken?

 

First I/we have heard of this was from your posts.

 

No mention of debate rules being broken by the moderators or host network that I have seen or heard.

 

Believe me, they would of informed the public of these so called broken rules.

[Lacessit]

9 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Good God.  Back in her 30's Mom used to yell at one of us kids, calling us another one's name.  Sometimes, she'd rattle off 2 or 3 names before she landed on the right one.

 

Strangely, she never vapor locked during a conversation.

 

Seems to me you are ignoring your own genetic inheritance.

[G_Money]

21 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Neither you nor I know how the public is going to respond to Kamala Harris as the Dem nominee. 

 

It's going to take a few weeks for the polling to inform us of the status of the race. I don't claim to know how the race will shape up, right now.

 

What I do know is that the selection of JD Vance has been overcome by events, and there is pressure on Trump to dump Vance.

 

 

““Overcome by events “

 

Such as?  You mean he disagreed with him in the past?  Welcome to politics.

 

”Pressure on Trump to dump Vance”

 

From who?  

[newnative]

10 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Can you inform us what rules were broken?

 

First I/we have heard of this was from your posts.

 

No mention of debate rules being broken by the moderators or host network that I have seen or heard.

 

Believe me, they would of informed the public of these so called broken rules.

   Don't be so anal.  He broke the first rule of a debate, answer the question posed to you.  I invite you to go back to the debate and listen to his answer to the question regarding child care.  Or climate change.  Basically, he showed up and regurgitated big chunks of his campaign speech, with assorted other lies thrown in.   The moderators were terrible with letting him make a mockery of what a debate should be.   

[G_Money]

8 minutes ago, newnative said:

   Don't be so anal.  He broke the first rule of a debate, answer the question posed to you.  I invite you to go back to the debate and listen to his answer to the question regarding child care.  Or climate change.  Basically, he showed up and regurgitated big chunks of his campaign speech, with assorted other lies thrown in.   The moderators were terrible with letting him make a mockery of what a debate should be.   

Oh, I see now.

 

He broke YOUR rules.

 

Not the host network or the moderators.

 

As I recall, YOUR rules were not in the agreement between Biden, Trump and the host network.

 

Suggest you draft a letter to the network informing them your debate rules were broken.

 

They should be implemented by the time of the next debate.

[newnative]

6 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Oh, I see now.

 

He broke YOUR rules.

 

Not the host network or the moderators.

 

As I recall, YOUR rules were not in the agreement between Biden, Trump and the host network.

 

Suggest you draft a letter to the network informing them your debate rules were broken.

 

They should be implemented by the time of the next debate.

     If Trump's involved, the next debate won't be a debate, it will just be another campaign stop for him.  The networks should stop enabling him.  I invite you to watch what a debate is, maybe Kennedy-Nixon.  

[G_Money]

28 minutes ago, newnative said:

     If Trump's involved, the next debate won't be a debate, it will just be another campaign stop for him.  The networks should stop enabling him.  I invite you to watch what a debate is, maybe Kennedy-Nixon.  

Your opinion.

 

Trump agreed to ALL of the conditions insisted by Biden or Biden wouldn’t debate him.

 

Condoned by the network and moderators.

 

No rules broken except the ones in your head.

 

It's 2024, not 1960.  Maybe you should update.

[HappyExpat57]

8 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Clearly you do not understand the immunity case, but he could try closing the border, start compiling with court rulings, and quit lying would be a nice start. 

 

Oh, and he might as well pardon his criminal family members. 

Clearly you do nit understand satire.

[stoner]

6 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

But as I said, I think CNN intentionally did Biden in with the split-screen. That face is what really killed Biden. 

 

you mean this face ?