Jump to content

Trump's pick of JD Vance a hopefully fatal mistake for his maga fascist movement


Recommended Posts

On 7/26/2024 at 8:52 PM, Yellowtail said:

Half the country are MAGA fascists, how funny is that? 

 

Again, but as usual ie true to MAGA form, you're over-estimating your own kind. No, the majority of MAGA cult are not fascists. They, like you, tend to dress funny, and, like you, ready to regurgitate any nonsense that Trump has managed to pump into their empty skull. There they don't have enough room to hold any ideology, let alone fascism, having drunk Trump kool-aid they have given up their critical thinking  and simply do what he told them to do ("But my prez told me to storm the Capitol, I did nothig wrong!") In short, Trump promised you greater power on the condition that you subsumed yours to his. JD - recently downgraded down to PC (as in "Please clap") - Vance is the latest Hillbilly numbnut sucked into Trump orbit. (But oh there're some many of them, just don't call them all fascists.)

 

Talking of Vance, the fly in Trump's ointment, masquerading as the fly in Pence hair, was Pence refusal to Trump wish of annuling the electors votes, and for that he wanted him hanged in 2021. Project 2025 is Trump brainchild, put forth by his clique of "washed-up has-been wannabes" sycophants, out of the White House and/or out of jail, to make sure that there won't be another Pence in any corner of any federal and state buildings next time. "If at first you didn't succeed..." - who said that btw?

Edited by watthong
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

It's obvious that the choice of JD Vance was a mistake. 

 

My understanding is that the deadline to replace him is August 7.

 

I thought that Sarah Palin was the worst VP candidate, but Vance wins.

Harris is the worst. Tulsi destroyed the dud in a debate. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BigStar said:

 

One of the current leftist lies. Trump has nothing to with 2025 and has said so. Some of it flatly contradicts his positions.

 

Trump's agenda is the Republican Party platform he helped write and approve. That's what he's being elected to try to do, and so he intends to try. 

 

Here it is for you again.

1.    Seal the border, and stop the migrant invasion
2.    Carry out the largest deportation operation in American history
3.    End inflation, and make America affordable again
4.    Make America the dominant energy producer in the world, by far!
5.    Stop outsourcing, and turn the United States into a manufacturing superpower
6.    Large tax cuts for workers, and no tax on tips!
7.    Defend our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, and our fundamental freedoms, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to keep and bear arms
8.    Prevent World War Three, restore peace in Europe and in the Middle East, and build a great ir

 

 

Project 2025 was written by Trump's staff.

 

If you believe Trump, you are in trouble.

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

Project 2025 was written by Trump's staff.

 

No. No one on Trump's staff wrote Project 2025.

 

3 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

If you believe Trump, you are in trouble.

 

Ooh. Scary. I better start believing your lies!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BigStar said:

 

No. No one on Trump's staff wrote Project 2025.

 

 

Ooh. Scary. I better start believing your lies!

 

Former President Donald Trump says he has “no idea” who’s behind the Project 2025 policy blueprint. The authors include his senior energy and environmental appointees.

 

"Stephen Moore, an adviser to the Trump campaign who co-authored the Project 2025 framework, said the policy guide has been misunderstood.

 

“It’s not meant to be a blueprint for Donald Trump — it’s meant to be a blueprint for a conservative president,” Moore said.

 

“We wrote this as our dream scenario,” Moore said of the authors, a list that includes former Trump Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson and former Trump White House aide Peter Navarro, who’s serving in federal prison after he was convicted of contempt of Congress."

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Former President Donald Trump says he has “no idea” who’s behind the Project 2025 policy blueprint. The authors include his senior energy and environmental appointees.

 

"Stephen Moore, an adviser to the Trump campaign who co-authored the Project 2025 framework, said the policy guide has been misunderstood.

 

“It’s not meant to be a blueprint for Donald Trump — it’s meant to be a blueprint for a conservative president,” Moore said.

 

“We wrote this as our dream scenario,” Moore said of the authors, a list that includes former Trump Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson and former Trump White House aide Peter Navarro, who’s serving in federal prison after he was convicted of contempt of Congress."

 

Irrelevant. As I said, no one on Trump's staff helped write the Project 2025. Trump had nothing to do with it and it contradicts Trump's agenda. You've been informed what the agenda really is.

 

Try to think and stop repeating that lie from the Harris campaign echoed in the propaganda press.

 

 

 

Edited by BigStar
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why hopefully fatal mistake? Not all Americans I'm sure want as Commander-in-Chief a person who just happened to be "black" or "brown" or just happened to have a vagina as their sole qualification in life. Many Americans feel safer having Trump to push (or not push) the red button of mutual assured destruction. Trump is a freak all right, even a scowndrel may be, but he is not totally incompetent. He climbed the social ladder in his own right. He was not coopted into power by anyone. He can keep the World alive and face bullies.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump is openly stating that the old system will be replaced with the President have full control over agencies.

 

Civil servants will be replaced with political appointees.

 

You are misrepresenting Trump's plans. Why would you do that?

 

The POTUS already has this power. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

I have pointed out some already.

 

Project 2025 aims to reverse civil rights protections for minorities.

 

Project 2025 aims to cut Social Security and Medicare.

 

I don't have time to educate you on the threat posed by Trump's election. 

  Project 2025 does none of the above.  You are lying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/25/2024 at 1:26 AM, nobodysfriend said:

Now , they ( Trump team ) are all busy to find her weak spots to be able to attack her

That's the normal course of action from the opposing side, it's not unique to Trump's people at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TedG said:

  Project 2025 does none of the above.  You are lying.

You're wrong but the worst part is replacing highly skilled very experienced civil servants with people only qualified based on their loyalty to Trump. That translates to a Trump dictatorship. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

You're wrong but the worst part is replacing highly skilled very experienced civil servants with people only qualified based on their loyalty to Trump. That translates to a Trump dictatorship. 

I think we should start with your lie about Social Security.  I searched for Social Security, here are the hits.

 

 

Screenshot 2024-07-29 at 4.38.49 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

You're wrong but the worst part is replacing highly skilled very experienced civil servants with people only qualified based on their loyalty to Trump. That translates to a Trump dictatorship. 

Hit one.

 

 

Screenshot 2024-07-29 at 4.40.13 PM.png

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

You're wrong but the worst part is replacing highly skilled very experienced civil servants with people only qualified based on their loyalty to Trump. That translates to a Trump dictatorship. 

hit 2

 

 

Screenshot 2024-07-29 at 4.42.02 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2024 at 12:53 PM, TedG said:

@Jingthing Why do you call the movement fascist?  Let’s talk about this. 

Well, for one thing, there's a candidate who believes that the President should have unconditional immunity for any criminal acts without exception that he commits while in office.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TedG said:

No, that’s not true.  The immunity only applies to official acts listed in the US Constitution.  

LOL. Please, do tell what official acts are. Oh, a corrupt supreme court needs to decide. Hahaha.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, gargamon said:

LOL. Please, do tell what official acts are. Oh, a corrupt supreme court needs to decide. Hahaha.

 

What are ‘official acts’ and why are they presumed immune?

Return to menu

The Supreme Court in a 1982 decision involving President Richard M. Nixon said that the Constitution shields presidents from private civil lawsuits for actions taken as part of their official duties — even those at the “outer perimeter” of their responsibilities. But the court in a 1997 case involving President Bill Clinton said presidents could be sued for private conduct.

 

Examples of exclusive presidential powers listed in the Constitution include commanding the armed forces, appointing government officials and judges, pardoning defendants and engaging in diplomacy. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said the executive branch also has unchallengeable authority to decide which crimes to prosecute.

“The President may discuss potential investigations and prosecutions with his Attorney General and other Justice Department officials to carry out his constitutional duty to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,’” Roberts said.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/07/02/official-act-trump-immunity-trial-judge/

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TedG said:

 

What are ‘official acts’ and why are they presumed immune?

Return to menu

The Supreme Court in a 1982 decision involving President Richard M. Nixon said that the Constitution shields presidents from private civil lawsuits for actions taken as part of their official duties — even those at the “outer perimeter” of their responsibilities. But the court in a 1997 case involving President Bill Clinton said presidents could be sued for private conduct.

 

Examples of exclusive presidential powers listed in the Constitution include commanding the armed forces, appointing government officials and judges, pardoning defendants and engaging in diplomacy. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said the executive branch also has unchallengeable authority to decide which crimes to prosecute.

“The President may discuss potential investigations and prosecutions with his Attorney General and other Justice Department officials to carry out his constitutional duty to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,’” Roberts said.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/07/02/official-act-trump-immunity-trial-judge/

 

 

Again, before you try to continue your obfuscation, the current corrupt supreme court needs to decide. Hahaha.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...