On 7/27/2024 at 5:13 AM, stoner said:

 

No I don’t remember that. Must be a blue maga fluff conspiracy. 

Did you switch to PCP as most stoners behave but you, not so much!

On 7/27/2024 at 10:51 AM, impulse said:

You give yourself away when you call it a bipartisan bill.

 

Unless you can name the Repubs that were involved, you're just puking up Dem/MSM talking points.

 

Can you name even a few Repubs?

I can easily as this was a commitee but you need to learn how and where to find knowledge

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

From CNN! Sure, sure I absolutely believe everything CNN says about Trump, LOL.

Sad some think like that. It's on many sites, but some have paywalls, so CNN is easiest.

 

Still makes my point that if you only get your information from one side of the political spectrum, you won't know about news like this. You've fallen for the propaganda

2 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

I can easily as this was a commitee but you need to learn how and where to find knowledge

That individual only gets information from really dodgy sites. Sad.

18 hours ago, stevenl said:

Either the document is there or it isn't, the source really doesn't matter. Are you claiming the document doesn't exist?

Document is just a piece of paper with words on it. It needs to be backed up by a reputable source, and IMO CNN is hardly reputable when it comes to Trump.

13 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Sad some think like that. It's on many sites, but some have paywalls, so CNN is easiest.

 

Still makes my point that if you only get your information from one side of the political spectrum, you won't know about news like this. You've fallen for the propaganda

I don't get my info from either "side", as I don't trust "sides". I get my info from Al Jazeera which is about as neutral as is possible to be, and otherwise I'll google and look a various articles.

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Document is just a piece of paper with words on it. It needs to be backed up by a reputable source, and IMO CNN is hardly reputable when it comes to Trump.

Lol. The proof is there, but you don't like the source therefore the proof doesn't count.

Your echo chamber has been reduced to only 1 source, yourself.

15 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I don't get my info from either "side", as I don't trust "sides". I get my info from Al Jazeera which is about as neutral as is possible to be, and otherwise I'll google and look a various articles.

Al Jazeera is ok. I prefer the NY Times.

On 8/19/2024 at 12:38 PM, stevenl said:

Lol. The proof is there, but you don't like the source therefore the proof doesn't count.

Your echo chamber has been reduced to only 1 source, yourself.

CNN is not a source I believe because they are so biased against Trump.

 

That doesn't excuse your rather sad personal insult.

16 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Al Jazeera is ok. I prefer the NY Times.

NY Times doesn't play on my freeview tv channel and I'm not going to pay to see tv ( 90% is garbage IMO- referring to tv in general, not NY Times )

On 8/16/2024 at 3:45 PM, Eric Loh said:

I detect sarcasm when you bring up 2 of his well documented failings. 

Apologies I misspelt the word depraved  as deprived .....its an easy mistake!