Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Clearly you don't understand his post.

 

6 minutes ago, novacova said:

You seem disappointed that the voices of those you oppose aren’t being suppressed.

Annoying isn’t it.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Love It 1
Posted
11 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

His advertisers also have the right of free speech AND the right to remain silent.... on X.

That is questionable as in most countries collaboration to destroy a competitor is considered illegal.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, itsari said:

That is questionable as in most countries collaboration to destroy a competitor is considered illegal.

so X is a competitor to Disney?  I agree with your statement but X's advertisers for the most part are not competitors.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

so X is a competitor to Disney?  I agree with your statement but X's advertisers for the most part are not competitors.

I believe it was more companies involved in not advertising with X .

If a company is not a competitor it is still considered illegal if a group of companies collude to harm another .

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, itsari said:

That is questionable as in most countries collaboration to destroy a competitor is considered illegal.

 

26 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

so X is a competitor to Disney?  I agree with your statement but X's advertisers for the most part are not competitors.

 

15 minutes ago, itsari said:

I believe it was more companies involved in not advertising with X .

If a company is not a competitor it is still considered illegal if a group of companies collude to harm another .

The companies decided to limit/stop advertising on X because X could not/would not promise that the ads would not appear in conjunction with material the companies found offensive.  That is their right.

Even if a single company/organisation advised the companies to do so, that is legal because the said company does not have any authority over their client's decisions.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      Football aristocracy trades boots for birdies in epic golf showdown

    2. 0

      Major Fire Breaks Out at Ratchaburi Candle Factory, Firefighters Struggled to Contain the Bl

    3. 70

      Trump Declares Himself Chairman of Kennedy Center, Immediately Bans Drag Performances

    4. 18

      Big Joke Files Complaint Against Police Chief Over Alleged Dereliction of Duty

    5. 10

      Australian Nurses Suspended Over Hate Speech Antisemitic Video as Investigation Unfolds

    6. 187

      What low/medium price wine do you recommend.

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...