19 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

Wow: Quote: ". Trump and his Team have already spread the word to informers - if you see/hear of anyone doing anything to damage Trump's Presidency, keep the evidence and give it to us when we arrive... will be investigated, charged and tried". So, it means NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH under Trump. When I say that Trump is incompetent (I bet not 1 company in the S&P500 would want him as CEO, ha ha!), I am damaging Trump, so I will be prosecuted (which law will be applicable?). Newspapers will be shut down under Trump when they criticize his stupid economic plans, which will increase inflation?

Newspapers will be shut down - ROFLOL - clam down, you are going to have a stroke.  But that is how you guys will play it for sure. Defeat is not what you will accept - just look at what happened after Clinton lost.

 

This time around Trump will not hold back for fear of those political tactics that the Dems will play - just like in your BS above.  Trump will follow Harris' lead and 'follow the law' - rioting is illegal and unless stopped quickly by the locals - which we all know the Dems will not do in their States - Trump will enforce the Laws.  

5 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

Trump is vulnerable regarding blackmail by Russia: sex tapes!
https://www.salon.com/2019/12/10/alleged-pee-tape-incident-wasnt-the-only-trump-sex-party-in-russia-probed-by-steele_partner/

That again 😂  Unbelievable !!!

13 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

Hard to believe that you are so blind folded, biased and st..p.d.
Your quote: "the Ukraine war, that no one wants to continue (aside from Zelensky and his cohorts). " This is THE most st.p.d statement ever: Zelensky doesn;t want war, he wants it to end asap. PUTIN wants war, he wants all Ukr. You are a bizarre id..t.
There should be a IQ test before anyone should be allowed to vote.... 40-60% of the Reps would fail

You are beyond help mate - the symptoms are very clear - cognitive bias - you believe all the Dem narrative.

Plus of course being so woke your attacks and personal insults are more and more extreme, the more I try to break through your cognitive bias - much like a teenager being told something they refuse to listen to when they are losing. 

Go to your room.

34 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

That rule was made on December 2023 - under the President of Joe Biden - I wonder why???

No mate - it is you who are ignorant as per your own words.

Trump will EO to remove the basis of that Act - and it will go to SCOTUS.

Forcing a following President to follow your political desires with regards to Defence Policies is unconstitutional.

The GOP will support the POTUS and overturn that Act section that removes that nonsense condition.

 

Obviously you think like the Dem Party that it is OK to subvert the Constitution to enable your own political views.

Obviously you also agreed to weaponise the DOJ, FBI and the Courts to attack/defame a political opponent.

Trump is going to tear it down - the corrupted rein of your Democrat Party is going to be destroyed.

 

Get yourself ready - and if your lot storm the streets again - The National Guard will be employed this time.

If Antifa raises its ugly illegal head again, they will be arrested and given a military trial.

I am certain you lot will claim 'human rights and Trump is a nazi' - but he and we dont care anymore.

 

Does your ignorance extend to the fact that Zelensky has enacted a state of martial law over the whole of Ukraine and abolished the elections?? He is permanently in charge while the war continues with Russia. Are you ignorant of the fact that this was how Hitler took his first step when taking over Germany??  

The absurdity of your comments is rising exponentially. You are lost.
Study the difference between Zelensky and Hitler and their countries:
Hitler took over Germany so he could go to war.
Putin did the same in Russia, cheating with the elections, having full power and control and he went to war. Blame Putin, not Zelensky, you Russian traitor. You have such a twisted mind...

35 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

The absurdity of your comments is rising exponentially. You are lost.
Study the difference between Zelensky and Hitler and their countries:
Hitler took over Germany so he could go to war.
Putin did the same in Russia, cheating with the elections, having full power and control and he went to war. Blame Putin, not Zelensky, you Russian traitor. You have such a twisted mind...

The duplicity is astounding - where were you 'educated' - are you a Gen Z - that would explain the ignorance.

With no substance at all, you claim Trump is a Hitler, but when Zelensky does exactly the same as Hitler did - impose martial law as a first step to total control - you dont see anything.  There are none so blind.  

 

2 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

The duplicity is astounding - where were you 'educated' - are you a Gen Z - that would explain the ignorance.

With no substance at all, you claim Trump is a Hitler, but when Zelensky does exactly the same as Hitler did - impose martial law as a first step to total control - you dont see anything.  There are none so blind.  

 

Didn't you mean."Putin".........

8 minutes ago, transam said:

Didn't you mean."Putin".........

I am not a supporter of either Putin or Zelensky - BUT:-

Putin’s First Election, March 2000 | National Security Archive (gwu.edu)

 

Vladimir Putin’s first election as president of Russia 24 years ago was “reasonably free and fair,” according to a declassified U.S. Embassy message from Moscow, one of ten documents on Russia’s 2000 presidential race published today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University. 

 

Putin drew nearly 53% of the vote in March 2000 against 29% for the second-place Communist candidate, thus winning without a runoff. The same Communist had amassed 40% in the 1996 presidential elections against Boris Yeltsin, who had appointed Putin prime minister in August 1999 and then acting president on New Year’s Eve 1999. The Embassy analysis concluded that Putin was genuinely popular, with “spectacular” increases in approval ratings in the fall of 1999, primarily because of his tough, militarized response to Chechen terrorists who had invaded neighboring Dagestan and allegedly bombed apartment buildings in Moscow and elsewhere.

 

Your delusional views of Putin's start as Leader of Russia are from the US/Western propaganda against Russia. I am not saying that he is a 'good guy' - but your claim he 'took power' like Hitler did, is a sad reflection of the ignorance of people like yourself about the truth. Putin was elected because the years after the dissolution of the USSR had resulted in massive economic and social problems in Russia. That he has 'ensured' his continued stay via electoral changes advantageous to himself, is without doubt true - I think they call it 'gerrymandering' in USA. 

7 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

I am not a supporter of either Putin or Zelensky - BUT:-

Putin’s First Election, March 2000 | National Security Archive (gwu.edu)

 

Vladimir Putin’s first election as president of Russia 24 years ago was “reasonably free and fair,” according to a declassified U.S. Embassy message from Moscow, one of ten documents on Russia’s 2000 presidential race published today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University. 

 

Putin drew nearly 53% of the vote in March 2000 against 29% for the second-place Communist candidate, thus winning without a runoff. The same Communist had amassed 40% in the 1996 presidential elections against Boris Yeltsin, who had appointed Putin prime minister in August 1999 and then acting president on New Year’s Eve 1999. The Embassy analysis concluded that Putin was genuinely popular, with “spectacular” increases in approval ratings in the fall of 1999, primarily because of his tough, militarized response to Chechen terrorists who had invaded neighboring Dagestan and allegedly bombed apartment buildings in Moscow and elsewhere.

 

Your delusional views of Putin's start as Leader of Russia are from the US/Western propaganda against Russia. I am not saying that he is a 'good guy' - but your claim he 'took power' like Hitler did, is a sad reflection of the ignorance of people like yourself about the truth. Putin was elected because the years after the dissolution of the USSR had resulted in massive economic and social problems in Russia. That he has 'ensured' his continued stay via electoral changes advantageous to himself, is without doubt true - I think they call it 'gerrymandering' in USA. 

I gave you a laugh, Putin's Ukraine land grab has gone tit's up and ruining Russia...

Many of his well-off citizens have been murdered, the country is not happy, so don't tell me the populace are all out there waving flags supporting the bloke...😉

1 hour ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

The duplicity is astounding - where were you 'educated' - are you a Gen Z - that would explain the ignorance.

With no substance at all, you claim Trump is a Hitler, but when Zelensky does exactly the same as Hitler did - impose martial law as a first step to total control - you dont see anything.  There are none so blind.  

 

Have you ever heard of martial law being imposed during a war?

3 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Newspapers will be shut down - ROFLOL - clam down, you are going to have a stroke.  But that is how you guys will play it for sure. Defeat is not what you will accept - just look at what happened after Clinton lost.

 

This time around Trump will not hold back for fear of those political tactics that the Dems will play - just like in your BS above.  Trump will follow Harris' lead and 'follow the law' - rioting is illegal and unless stopped quickly by the locals - which we all know the Dems will not do in their States - Trump will enforce the Laws.  

Can you tell me under part of the Constitution it is allowed for a President to subdue rioters outside of Washington DC?

 

Please don't tell me that Trump would impose martial law to subdue rioters. 

If you Trumpers really loved Trump, as you claim, you would urge him to take a rest, since he is obviously exhausted.

4 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

The duplicity is astounding - where were you 'educated' - are you a Gen Z - that would explain the ignorance.

With no substance at all, you claim Trump is a Hitler, but when Zelensky does exactly the same as Hitler did - impose martial law as a first step to total control - you dont see anything.  There are none so blind.  

 

Again you show your low IQ, you can't even read! In my post I didn't compare Trump with Hitler: I compared Putin with Hitler. Read again! And I had a very good education, been teacher for 30 years and now 70 yrs of age, and able to recognize stupid people just by reading their posts. No worries, I am not voting for Kamala Harris, I am not American.

5 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Putin was elected because the years after the dissolution of the USSR had resulted in massive economic and social problems in Russia. That he has 'ensured' his continued stay via electoral changes advantageous to himself, is without doubt true - I think they call it 'gerrymandering' in USA. 

I think you need to brush up on your understanding of what it is to gerrymander:

 

ger·ry·man·der

/ˈjerēˌmandər/

verb

gerund or present participle: gerrymandering

1. manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favor one party or class.

   • achieve (a result) by manipulating the boundaries of an electoral constituency.

     "a total freedom to gerrymander the results they want"

     https://www.google.com/search?q=gerrymandering&oq=gerrymandering&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDMwODVqMGo5qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

      

     Murdering your opponents and journalists  is not actually entailed under the definition of gerrymandering. 

 

On 9/18/2024 at 12:09 PM, TroubleandGrumpy said:

And best of all - he can dodge a bullet - even Reagan could not do that

 

I do NOT love him.

 

I PREFER him.

 

On 9/18/2024 at 12:09 PM, TroubleandGrumpy said:

And best of all - he can dodge a bullet - even Reagan could not do that 😁

 

 

The moment Trump knew he's been struck probably, given the circumstance, by a bullet, is when said bullet struck him. Prior to that, he was not aware of the shooter firing at him from 300 meters away.Therefore he did not "evade," or tried to, ie "dodge" (see transitive 1) a bullet. Itn fact it struck him in one ear, blood all over that side of his face.

 

Lesson to be learned (late better than never):

One doesn't win arguments by dishonesty.

Or by "dodging" the truth (see transitive 2)

 

dodge
transitive verb

1
a
: to evade by a sudden or repeated shift of position
dodge tacklers
b
: to avoid an encounter with
celebrities dodging the media
2
: to evade (something, such as a duty) usually indirectly or by trickery
dodged the draft by leaving the country

4 hours ago, Steven55 said:

Again you show your low IQ, you can't even read! In my post I didn't compare Trump with Hitler: I compared Putin with Hitler. Read again! And I had a very good education, been teacher for 30 years and now 70 yrs of age, and able to recognize stupid people just by reading their posts. No worries, I am not voting for Kamala Harris, I am not American.

 

So, if you were American, and since you have a high IQ, then I can only assume that you would not be voting for Harris.

 

9 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

So, if you were American, and since you have a high IQ, then I can only assume that you would not be voting for Harris.

 

Reading and understanding, and then coming up with a logical answer probably isn't your strongest quality.... OMG, shocking!
Something 'else': Would any integer person vote for failed business men and cheater like this? Trump has been cheating in nearly every business deal:

 

20 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

You are beyond help mate - the symptoms are very clear - cognitive bias - you believe all the Dem narrative.

Plus of course being so woke your attacks and personal insults are more and more extreme, the more I try to break through your cognitive bias - much like a teenager being told something they refuse to listen to when they are losing. 

Go to your room.

Wow, ha ha: I believe solid journalism, news that has been double checked.
You blindly believe Trump, and Rep news sources: here a Rep cheat, which has been proved with facts to be falsified: Harris said that Trump is unstable, but the video was manipulated in a way that made Harris say that Biden is unstable. THAT is de criminal, sick cheating mentality of many Reps, and you are so biased that you easily buy it. So, who refuses to listen, who is too st.p.d to recognize facts? Read this and check it in the original interview:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/harris-called-trump-not-biden-225954906.html

Which integer person can vote for a person who doesn't pay his bills and can't run a business? Just watch this and then say that Trump is a honest and empathic person and has the skills to run a business.

 

21 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

integer person

 

First for me to run into this term.

How could I have missed this...over the many years I have been alive?

Still, glad that I now know the meaning.

In case I hear it once again in the distant future.

 

When I think of an integer, I think about my happy days in Math classes.

 

19 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

I am not a supporter of either Putin or Zelensky - BUT:-

Putin’s First Election, March 2000 | National Security Archive (gwu.edu)

 

Vladimir Putin’s first election as president of Russia 24 years ago was “reasonably free and fair,” according to a declassified U.S. Embassy message from Moscow, one of ten documents on Russia’s 2000 presidential race published today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University. 

 

Putin drew nearly 53% of the vote in March 2000 against 29% for the second-place Communist candidate, thus winning without a runoff. The same Communist had amassed 40% in the 1996 presidential elections against Boris Yeltsin, who had appointed Putin prime minister in August 1999 and then acting president on New Year’s Eve 1999. The Embassy analysis concluded that Putin was genuinely popular, with “spectacular” increases in approval ratings in the fall of 1999, primarily because of his tough, militarized response to Chechen terrorists who had invaded neighboring Dagestan and allegedly bombed apartment buildings in Moscow and elsewhere.

 

Your delusional views of Putin's start as Leader of Russia are from the US/Western propaganda against Russia. I am not saying that he is a 'good guy' - but your claim he 'took power' like Hitler did, is a sad reflection of the ignorance of people like yourself about the truth. Putin was elected because the years after the dissolution of the USSR had resulted in massive economic and social problems in Russia. That he has 'ensured' his continued stay via electoral changes advantageous to himself, is without doubt true - I think they call it 'gerrymandering' in USA. 

 

19 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

I am not a supporter of either Putin or Zelensky - BUT:-

Putin’s First Election, March 2000 | National Security Archive (gwu.edu)

 

Vladimir Putin’s first election as president of Russia 24 years ago was “reasonably free and fair,” according to a declassified U.S. Embassy message from Moscow, one of ten documents on Russia’s 2000 presidential race published today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University. 

 

Putin drew nearly 53% of the vote in March 2000 against 29% for the second-place Communist candidate, thus winning without a runoff. The same Communist had amassed 40% in the 1996 presidential elections against Boris Yeltsin, who had appointed Putin prime minister in August 1999 and then acting president on New Year’s Eve 1999. The Embassy analysis concluded that Putin was genuinely popular, with “spectacular” increases in approval ratings in the fall of 1999, primarily because of his tough, militarized response to Chechen terrorists who had invaded neighboring Dagestan and allegedly bombed apartment buildings in Moscow and elsewhere.

 

Your delusional views of Putin's start as Leader of Russia are from the US/Western propaganda against Russia. I am not saying that he is a 'good guy' - but your claim he 'took power' like Hitler did, is a sad reflection of the ignorance of people like yourself about the truth. Putin was elected because the years after the dissolution of the USSR had resulted in massive economic and social problems in Russia. That he has 'ensured' his continued stay via electoral changes advantageous to himself, is without doubt true - I think they call it 'gerrymandering' in USA. 

Putin was elected, popular and in his first terms he did well. He also said in 2000 that Nato isn't a threat for Russia and that Russia is part of an European culture. Gradually, Putin turned into a dictator. You are justifying his current dictator status with his normally democratically elected leadership from 25 years ago. You are very stuck in your thinking: no flexibility to form a different opinion based on new facts. Sad. I wouldn't be surprised if you think that 9-11 was an inside job... Many Reps believe so...

20 hours ago, transam said:

I gave you a laugh, Putin's Ukraine land grab has gone tit's up and ruining Russia...

Many of his well-off citizens have been murdered, the country is not happy, so don't tell me the populace are all out there waving flags supporting the bloke...😉

You think whatever the MSM and Dems tell you - deluded so much you cannot see a point.

It was 24 years ago when Putin was elected and he was very popular - he did not 'take over' like Hitler. 

12 hours ago, watthong said:

 

The moment Trump knew he's been struck probably, given the circumstance, by a bullet, is when said bullet struck him. Prior to that, he was not aware of the shooter firing at him from 300 meters away.Therefore he did not "evade," or tried to, ie "dodge" (see transitive 1) a bullet. Itn fact it struck him in one ear, blood all over that side of his face.

 

Lesson to be learned (late better than never):

One doesn't win arguments by dishonesty.

Or by "dodging" the truth (see transitive 2)

 

dodge
transitive verb

1
a
: to evade by a sudden or repeated shift of position
dodge tacklers
b
: to avoid an encounter with
celebrities dodging the media
2
: to evade (something, such as a duty) usually indirectly or by trickery
dodged the draft by leaving the country

The grammar/spelling police have arrived !! 

Why are they always woke liberals??

 

2 hours ago, Steven55 said:

Wow, ha ha: I believe solid journalism, news that has been double checked.
You blindly believe Trump, and Rep news sources: here a Rep cheat, which has been proved with facts to be falsified: Harris said that Trump is unstable, but the video was manipulated in a way that made Harris say that Biden is unstable. THAT is de criminal, sick cheating mentality of many Reps, and you are so biased that you easily buy it. So, who refuses to listen, who is too st.p.d to recognize facts? Read this and check it in the original interview:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/harris-called-trump-not-biden-225954906.html

Which integer person can vote for a person who doesn't pay his bills and can't run a business? Just watch this and then say that Trump is a honest and empathic person and has the skills to run a business.

And to think you wrote down all that in a post and believe it - unbelievable.

So much personal insults and ignorance all in one post - outstanding commitment to the cause.

1 minute ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

You think whatever the MSM and Dems tell you - deluded so much you cannot see a point.

It was 24 years ago when Putin was elected and he was very popular - he did not 'take over' like Hitler. 

Yeeh, riiiight..........

2 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Was it you who sculptured a naked Trump statue? 

 

Very artistic. 

 

More personal insults and abuse from the woke liberals - like teenagers telling chicken butt jokes.

Ever wonder why your lot are so immature and have no logical reasoning (like a teenager)?

It is because you have not yet 'grown up' and realised that woke liberalism is all BS.

 

 

1 hour ago, Steven55 said:

 

Putin was elected, popular and in his first terms he did well. He also said in 2000 that Nato isn't a threat for Russia and that Russia is part of an European culture. Gradually, Putin turned into a dictator. You are justifying his current dictator status with his normally democratically elected leadership from 25 years ago. You are very stuck in your thinking: no flexibility to form a different opinion based on new facts. Sad. I wouldn't be surprised if you think that 9-11 was an inside job... Many Reps believe so...

Your thinking is the one that is biased and not open to 'new facts' sunshine.

Read my post/s and then read yours above - exactly when did I say Putin was now a great popular leader.

Never did - you assumed that because your cognitive bias fired up those 'feelings' and you reacted emotionally. 

Try again and lets have a rational debate - or is that not possible with you?

6 minutes ago, transam said:

Yeeh, riiiight..........

OK that is enough of a first step (sort of).

Now read my posts slowly and maybe you will see/hear what I actually said. 

Take your emotions out of it - give it a try.

I am not asking you to agree - but I do want you to listen/read to the point I made and respond rationally and logically.

No 'Trump is Bad' or 'Putin is Evil' emotional baggage please.

 

1 minute ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

OK that is enough of a first step (sort of).

Now read my posts slowly and maybe you will see/hear what I actually said. 

Take your emotions out of it - give it a try.

I am not asking you to agree - but I do want you to listen/read to the point I made and respond rationally and logically.

No 'Trump is Bad' or 'Putin is Evil' emotional baggage please.

 

Not interested, ANYONE in control of the USA is better than your nutter, a crook, a robber. 

But if that is your thing, then you carry on chap, it is amusing.......................🤭

20 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

You think whatever the MSM and Dems tell you - deluded so much you cannot see a point.

It was 24 years ago when Putin was elected and he was very popular - he did not 'take over' like Hitler. 

Actually, Hitler was elected, too.

 

So, what's your point? An autocrat can take over in a hard coup, or a soft coup, the end result is the same.

 

I am sure Trump would prefer a soft coup.

22 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

You think whatever the MSM and Dems tell you - deluded so much you cannot see a point.

It was 24 years ago when Putin was elected and he was very popular - he did not 'take over' like Hitler. 

Actually, Putin was not popular 24 years ago, he got in via Yeltsin's endorsement. Nobody was excited about Putin.

 

I know - I was there.

 

No, I didn't vote for him.