Jump to content

MP urges central bank governor to resign over call centre scams


webfact

Recommended Posts

calscam.webp


People’s Party list MP Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn launched a blistering attack on the governor of the Bank of Thailand, urging him to resign if he can’t protect the public from the alarming rise in call centre scams.

 

He slammed the central bank for reaching a “lowest point,” with scammers boldly impersonating officials to trick unsuspecting Thais into transferring their cash.

 

Wiroj accused Governor Sethaput Suthiwartnarueput of doing little more than posting warnings on Facebook, as countless victims fall prey to these scams. He called for urgent measures to delay money transfers, highlighting that many victims realise they’ve been conned almost immediately but are powerless to reverse real-time transactions.

 

“A simple delay in transfers based on the amount sent could save many from financial ruin.”


Wiroj insisted that this wouldn’t interfere with regular banking. He also demanded that commercial banks be held accountable for protecting their customers’ accounts, pointing out that in countries plagued by such scams, banks often evade responsibility, leaving victims without compensation.

 

Kitti Kosavisutte, head of the Thailand Banking Sector Computer Emergency Response Team, admitted that while delaying money transfers is technically possible, it might only scratch the surface of the issue and could frustrate honest customers.


Cyber Crime Prevention

 

Police are working on amending the Royal Decree on Cyber Crime Prevention to bolster protections against cyber fraud, particularly focusing on mule accounts and data leaks. Public and private sectors are considering a 12-hour delay on suspicious transactions, aiming to catch fraudsters while their victims are asleep, said Kitti.

 

“This delay could help flag suspicious accounts and thwart fraudulent activities.”

 

However, it would target only accounts flagged for fraud rather than impacting all transactions.

 

In a bid to ensure full accountability, discussions are underway to involve banks, telecom operators, and consumers in compensating scam victims. The Bank of Thailand is collaborating with various regulatory agencies to guarantee that victims receive 100% compensation, while carefully assessing banks’ responsibilities in these situations.

 

Daranee Saeju, the central bank’s assistant governor for payment systems policy, warned that banks must tighten their security against data theft and fraud.

 

“If they fail to protect their systems, they might be forced to fully compensate victims.”

 

Mule accounts

 

While the central bank has not commented on Wiroj’s suggestions, it is working with various sectors to tackle cybercrime, especially concerning mule accounts, through a robust data-sharing framework.

 

Since last year’s implementation of the Royal Decree, efforts to verify deposit accounts have intensified, categorising accounts based on risk: black, grey, and brown. Black accounts are closely monitored and swiftly shut down, while grey accounts are managed through a new Central Fraud Register system. Brown accounts are verified internally by individual banks.

 

To further safeguard consumers, the central bank is pushing for a money-lock system and enhanced security features, including facial recognition for high-value transactions, expected to roll out by the fourth quarter of this year. So far, 15,000 depositors linked to mule accounts have been identified.

 

Digital Economy and Society Minister Prasert Jantararuangthong has vowed to maintain a strong focus on online fraud prevention and a sustainable digital economy. The Anti Online Scam Operation Center reported a sharp decline in daily financial losses due to online crime, having suspended over a million mule accounts and shut down 138,660 illegal URLs since October 2023—a staggering eleven-fold increase from the previous year.

 

With scams rampant in Thailand, affecting hundreds of thousands annually and causing financial damage of around 70 billion baht from March 2022 to July 2024, it’s clear that urgent action is needed. The Global Anti-Scam Alliance Report 2024 revealed that only 55% of Thais feel confident in identifying scams, while a staggering 89% encounter them at least once a month.

 

by Bob Scott
Picture courtesy of Pindrop

 

Source: The Thaiger 

-- 2024-09-19
 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

I wonder if one of his backhanders got delayed during a transfer and this has upset him?

Yeah, who the heck knows. Today anybody can be an MP.

Edited by Gottfrid
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

Wiroj accused Governor Sethaput Suthiwartnarueput of doing little more than posting warnings on Facebook, as countless victims fall prey to these scams. He called for urgent measures to delay money transfers, highlighting that many victims realise they’ve been conned almost immediately but are powerless to reverse real-time transactions.

 

Good and precise criticism. The Thai bank governor doesn't want to do anything. His policy is sit, wait, and watch the house burn down.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, digger70 said:

The Banks are responsible to keep their costumers account Safe from Hackers.

The Banks should Not be Responsible for people who are scammed into  transferring their cash.

If the gullible  people get Scammed to transfer their money that is Not the banks fault.

I don't see it that way. Example: Someone buys a watch on a Facebook page. The buyer verifies the seller's identity and receives a photo of the buyer's ID. The name on the ID corresponds to the name of the account holder. The buyer transfers his money. After a while the buyer realizes that he has been cheated. He files a police report about fraud. The buyer informs the sellers bank about the fraud and also sends the police report requesting that the transfer be reversed. And what does the bank do then? Nothing. Because the banks are simply not obliged to take action in such cases. And the seller continues his scams using the same account.

Banks in particular have the opportunity to check accounts for scam activity. Especially if there are multiple reports against a scammer account.

Edited by tomacht8
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, AlwaysThere said:

 

What you write does not make any sense to me. Can you elaborate?

 

21 minutes ago, AlwaysThere said:

 

What you write does not make any sense to me. Can you elaborate?

Major goverment officials and high ranking members of the Royal Thai police have been implicated in call centre scams and illegal phone centre gambling operations.

Why single out the govern. or of the bank of Thailand who has resisted  pressure from Thaksin and his daughter to alter the bank rate

The governor  retires next September and will  be replaced by one of Thaksin's cronies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, tomacht8 said:

I don't see it that way. Example: Someone buys a watch on a Facebook page. The buyer verifies the seller's identity and receives a photo of the buyer's ID. The name on the ID corresponds to the name of the account holder. The buyer transfers his money. After a while the buyer realizes that he has been cheated. He files a police report about fraud. The buyer informs the sellers bank about the fraud and also sends the police report requesting that the transfer be reversed. And what does the bank do then? Nothing. Because the banks are simply not obliged to take action in such cases. And the seller continues his scams using the same account.

Banks in particular have the opportunity to check accounts for scam activity. Especially if there are multiple reports against a scammer account.

First of all one never should buy from FB , Tik tok  , It's still the peoples fault they are Gullible, Same as with Loan Sharks, that's a Giant Scam and that cost people Everything that they have and more.

Not much get done about the Thousands of Small Sharks.

the Buyers  Bank doesn't know if  they  pay a scammer or a Legit Person  they only can know if the Buyer or the police informs the buyers Bank but saying that the Banks could help if they wanted but that's too much trouble for most of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jippytum said:

 

Major goverment officials and high ranking members of the Royal Thai police have been implicated in call centre scams and illegal phone centre gambling operations.

Why single out the govern. or of the bank of Thailand who has resisted  pressure from Thaksin and his daughter to alter the bank rate

The governor  retires next September and will  be replaced by one of Thaksin's cronies

 

Single out? Are you suggesting that the MP is one of Thaksin's cronies? Does not look that way to me.

Could it be that he is working on another solution to the problem? Do you think he will be more successful tackling the "call centre scams and illegal phone centre gambling operations"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The BOT Governor has nothing to do with catching criminals. The commercial banks and credit card companies must work with the police. They also need to improve their security but their job is not to run in the streets catching criminals.

Scams work by tricking people, so education might help.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, digger70 said:

First of all one never should buy from FB , Tik tok  , It's still the peoples fault they are Gullible, Same as with Loan Sharks, that's a Giant Scam and that cost people Everything that they have and more.

Not much get done about the Thousands of Small Sharks.

the Buyers  Bank doesn't know if  they  pay a scammer or a Legit Person  they only can know if the Buyer or the police informs the buyers Bank but saying that the Banks could help if they wanted but that's too much trouble for most of them.

Exactly. That is more work for them.

Thailand needs a central police data center where all reported scam activities are recorded nationwide. If a lot of reports are received for a specific scam account, the bank should at least freeze the account and the information about the account holder should be released so that at least civil lawsuits can be brought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""