Jump to content

Suspected Drunk Drivers in Thailand to Face New Testing Methods


Recommended Posts

image.jpeg

File photo

 

Thailand has introduced new regulations allowing police to use urine or blood tests to determine the alcohol levels of drivers suspected of being drunk if they refuse to take a breathalyser test. This announcement, published in the Royal Gazette, updates previous regulations from 1994 and 2017, which relied mainly on breathalyser tests.

 

The revised laws aim to modernise alcohol testing procedures and enhance the effectiveness of legal measures to combat drunk driving.

 

The regulation permits police officers to either collect urine samples on-site or escort drivers to a hospital for blood tests when breathalyser tests are refused.

 

Officers are instructed to secure drivers' consent before conducting urine tests and to provide a private and secure location for the sample collection.

 

They will also maintain control over the sample collection area to prevent any tampering. The collected urine samples will be sent to nearby hospitals for laboratory testing.


For blood tests, drivers refusing breathalysers will be taken to a hospital for medical examination. According to the new regulation, drivers found with more than 50 milligrammes of alcohol in their blood—and 20 milligrammes for those under 20 years old—will be charged with drunk driving, reported Bangkok Post.

 

Additionally, the law states that drivers refusing to undergo medical examinations without a valid reason will be presumed to have exceeded the legal blood alcohol limit.

 

In such cases, the medical professional will document the refusal and notify the police to initiate further investigation.

 

Earlier this year, the government approved an amendment to Thailand's Land Transportation Act, allowing alcohol level tests up to three hours after a driver has been stopped by police.

 

Karom Polpornklang, the then-deputy spokesman for the government, noted that the amended law would expand the methods available to identify drunk drivers beyond the traditional use of breathalysers.

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2024-09-23


news-footer-3.png

 

image.png

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, bkk6060 said:

It actually is a good idea and should create less corruption as a hospital will now be in the loop.  Unless, people think hospitals can/will be corrupted.

 

maybe the same way you get medically checked for your drivers license. by a licensed MD. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, bkk6060 said:

It actually is a good idea and should create less corruption as a hospital will now be in the loop.  Unless, people think hospitals can/will be corrupted.

Yeah.. so now we have to worry about the corrupt hospitals too wither bribing cops to make more tests without valid reasons or by the hospital staff accepting bribes to fake the test. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webfact said:

Thailand has introduced new regulations allowing police to use urine or blood tests to determine the alcohol levels of drivers suspected of being drunk if they refuse to take a breathalyser test. This announcement, published in the Royal Gazette, updates previous regulations from 1994 and 2017, which relied mainly on breathalyser tests.

Excellent news...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, brianbiegler said:

Lol seriously if the perp refuses to blow for you do really think he's gonna pee for you? 🤦🏼‍♂️

They will just take the piss out of you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brianbiegler said:

Lol seriously if the perp refuses to blow for you do really think he's gonna pee for you? 🤦🏼‍♂️

If you think your going to be just over it may be worth going for the urine or blood test. By the time they have organised it you may have gone under the limit,  plus I would probably be happier with results from a laboratory than a machine that is probably rarely calibrated. One would hope you will be given a sample for independent analysis like in thr UK.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, webfact said:

Officers are instructed to secure drivers' consent before conducting urine tests

so they do not consent to a Breathalyzer test........
why would they consent to a urine or blood test?

 

 

3 hours ago, webfact said:

Additionally, the law states that drivers refusing to undergo medical examinations without a valid reason will be presumed to have exceeded the legal blood alcohol limit.

why do they not simply apply this to the breathalyser test?
(it is also law that you must not be discriminated against if refusing any medical procedure)
refuse the roadside breathalyser and you are treated as over the limit, simple.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

It actually is a good idea and should create less corruption as a hospital will now be in the loop.  Unless, people think hospitals can/will be corrupted.

Does anybody think that hospitals cannot be corrupted ?    I can't  really think of any organization  or individual here that would be able to resist the  temptation, its in their DNA and always will be  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now








×
×
  • Create New...
""