Any benefits in antibiotics

[BritManToo]

1 hour ago, scubascuba3 said:

like who? don't forget many guys wives and girlfriends have secret thai boyfriends, how about yours?

I'm happy just to get my turn!

No need for further thought required on the matter.

 

Back on topic,

I find it very convenient in Thailand to be able to buy antibiotics without the 1-2 week delays we are forced to suffer in the west. The quicker you can take the medicine, the easier it is to treat the problem.

Edited 3 hours ago by BritManToo

[georgegeorgia]

14 hours ago, KannikaP said:

My goodness, we've gone a long way from taking ABs for a dose of the clap.

When I started this thread I wasn't thinking about sex antibiotics 

 

I was thinking more like the normal type Keflex , Doxycycline etc for things like urine infection or getting respiratory system illness etc 

[scubascuba3]

44 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Having invisible friends makes one mentally ill, which is not the same as stupid.

His posts indicate he is stupid and appears gullible too, religious types are the worse, so intolerant of others and so preachy 

[fredwiggy]

7 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Preach to someone else I'm not interested in your views.

 

My lawyer friend wanted to set me up with her 27yo lawyer friend last week,  i declined, not interested in a relationship, house, family etc

Like I said. Inability to treat a normal woman with respect, so best to stick with those with a price tag. Good for her also. Now she can find a better partner.

[jerrymahoney]

16 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Preach to someone else I'm not interested in your views.

 

My lawyer friend wanted to set me up with her 27yo lawyer friend last week,  i declined, not interested in a relationship, house, family etc

Won't get any argument from me -- I didn't get married first time ever until I was 70. And not to one of my long time non-live-in Thai girlfriends before that.

Edited 3 hours ago by jerrymahoney

[fredwiggy]

1 minute ago, scubascuba3 said:

His posts indicate he is stupid and appears gullible too, religious types are the worse, so intolerant of others and so preachy 

Actually my posts indicate I'm intelligent, honest and a researcher, instead of a narrow minded child with no respect for others. This is yet another case of a narcissist that thinks he knows others from a few posts.  A smart person can spot as smart person in time, but that leaves you out. Gullible is the last thing I am, but ignorant is spot on in your case.

Edited 3 hours ago by fredwiggy

[scubascuba3]

11 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Won't get any argument from me -- I didn't get married first time ever until I was 70. And not to one of my long time non-live-in Thai girlfriends before that.

Makes more sense when older for sure

[scubascuba3]

10 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Actually my posts indicate I'm intelligent, honest and a researcher, instead of a narrow minded child with no respect for others. This is yet another case of a narcissist that thinks he knows others from a few posts.  A smart person can spot as smart person in time, but that leaves you out. Gullible is the last thing I am, but ignorant is spot on in your case.

you're constantly preaching your way is the only way and no one is interested, preach elsewhere 

[scubascuba3]

13 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Actually my posts indicate I'm intelligent, honest and a researcher, instead of a narrow minded child with no respect for others. This is yet another case of a narcissist that thinks he knows others from a few posts.  A smart person can spot as smart person in time, but that leaves you out. Gullible is the last thing I am, but ignorant is spot on in your case.

For you

[fredwiggy]

Just now, scubascuba3 said:

you're constantly preaching your way is the only way and no one is interested, preach elsewhere 

I'm not preaching. I pointed out facts, with links, about antibiotic resistance, which pertains to this topic. You attack because you both, don't understand the links, ,or didn't bother to read them, and are jealous, as I mentioned that I only go with women that are normal, at least in the fact I don't have to pay for them. You think other men here have girlfriends and wives that have Thai boyfriends hidden somewhere. This might happen to some, but hardly the majority, so again, you're assuming things about people you know nothing about, like myself. Calling someone obviously more intelligent than you stupid only makes you look foolish. You like paying for women, and diseases you have had, and most likely spread, isn't something to be proud about. I prefer having a relationship. You don't want a house, family etc, so don't knock those that do and think their partners are cheating on them. Your shortcomings aren't my responsibility but yours. Stick to things you are educated about, whatever that may be.

[fredwiggy]

Just now, scubascuba3 said:

For you

You seem to not realize you have no others backing you, besides one that also pays for women, which isn't a promising accomplice. You think my postings and or replies are stupid, but you haven't yet pointed out one where I've been wrong. This is because I again, base my replies on things that have been researched, or known, for a number of years, and aren't my opinions, which wouldn't mean anything. A smart person indeed knows they are smart, and my IQ is pretty up there, although I don't feel the need to brag about it like a few here do. My replies show what I know, but only to those who are smart enough to realize this. People who are narrow minded and only go by others opinions they somehow believe to be true aren't researching but naive. I'm also usually here to help., replying to topics to give advice from my research and experience. You seem to be here to attack those you are jealous of, which usually comes from a lack of self esteem or a narcissistic personality. Something of which there is no cure.

[hotandsticky]

8 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

You seem to not realize you have no others backing you, besides one that also pays for women, which isn't a promising accomplice. You think my postings and or replies are stupid, but you haven't yet pointed out one where I've been wrong. This is because I again, base my replies on things that have been researched, or known, for a number of years, and aren't my opinions, which wouldn't mean anything. A smart person indeed knows they are smart, and my IQ is pretty up there, although I don't feel the need to brag about it like a few here do. My replies show what I know, but only to those who are smart enough to realize this. People who are narrow minded and only go by others opinions they somehow believe to be true aren't researching but naive. I'm also usually here to help., replying to topics to give advice from my research and experience. You seem to be here to attack those you are jealous of, which usually comes from a lack of self esteem or a narcissistic personality. Something of which there is no cure.

 

 

Your views on people who "pay for women" are opinion and therefore subjective.

[fredwiggy]

7 minutes ago, hotandsticky said:

 

 

Your views on people who "pay for women" are opinion and therefore subjective.

I don't have any views on those paying for women. That's their deal. If they can't find a normal women, not know how to treat one, or prefer prostitutes, there's reasons for this, whatever they may be. I only point out things when some say men who have wives and girlfriends who have local boyfriends and this isn't true for all. A few of course because women cheat worldwide, but assuming many, or most have, is an opinion, and also wrong. When someone backs up what another says, there are reasons for this, as I pointed out. Both seem to think most, if not all, women are whores and useless, except as slaves. This isn't true as most anyone knows. It isn't my opinion that they are wrong but a fact. If a person prefers prostitutes that's again, their deal, and if they have respect for other's women, that's good, but some buy because they like to use, or hate women, which is their problem.  Some because they don't want a relationship because they've had problems in their past relationships and only want to get off. Again their deal.

Edited 2 hours ago by fredwiggy

[KannikaP]

1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

Actually my posts indicate I'm intelligent, honest and a researcher

Says who? You?

[fredwiggy]

14 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

Says who? You?

Like I mentioned. A smart person can spot a smart person in a short while, by the way he talks, things he says and what he knows. Some people look at a couple of posts and think they know someone. They don't. If you go through a person's catalog of posts and replies, you'll see a pattern. Some are here to troll. Some are here to help. Some are here to have a discussion, minor argument on certain topics because they think their viewpoint is right. Some go by others opinions they somehow believe are true, and some go by facts brought about by research, personal experience and being a good listener.

 

If a person has any doubts about a person's intelligence after reading a number of their postings, it is them who isn't to up to speed on knowledge. A narcissist will always think they are right, and argue to the death because of their inferior thinking and attitude, even if they might be right sometimes. An Empath tries to help, and settle discussions amicably, because he understands how a person feels can mean more than what they are saying. He tries to see their side of the argument, even though it can be totally wrong, because his experiences may be different than the empath's.

 

Some here actually think others are stupid, without actually knowing them more than a few typed words in one or two topics. Again, you have to know a person for awhile, looking at what they have been saying over time, before you can even begin to judge. Even then, you yourself can be wrong and, thinking the other person is wrong, think they are stupid. This is what happens here, daily , because there are quite a few very disturbed people that post here, and most can tell who they are because they are usually only here to argue, troll if you like, instead of passing along advice that could be helpful. Some are so pigheaded in their beliefs that nothing, including facts, will change their minds. I'm the opposite of that. If a person is right, and has the facts to prove it, I listen. I know how smart I am, and where my limitations are. I've been a reader on many subjects, daily, for over 60 years, including psychology, so I know how people think, and react, to certain stimuli.

 

Saying a person is stupid without actually personally knowing them, for a long time, is a stupid assumption, period. I can see that some here aren't to bright, on certain subjects at least, but I won't call them stupid, because although they might not know anything about a particular subject, or just a little, they might know quite a lot about others, so I won't judge them. Look up my posts, then decide. Not one, two or three, but all of them. I don't make opinions because they mean so little. When I comment, it's from research and experience, not opinions or from others opinions but fact based research. I also don't lie because what's the point? This isn't an ego forum, or a teenage pissing contest, although some seem to make it that way.

Edited 47 minutes ago by fredwiggy

[TroubleandGrumpy]

2 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

For you

 

Very true - especially here.

 

 

 

 

 

[KannikaP]

34 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Like I mentioned. A smart person can spot a smart person in a short while, by the way he talks, things he says and what he knows. Some people look at a couple of posts and think they know someone. They don't. If you go through a person's catalog of posts and replies, you'll see a pattern. Some are here to troll. Some are here to help. Some are here to have a discussion, minor argument on certain topics because they think their viewpoint is right. Some go by others opinions they somehow believe are true, and some go by facts brought about by research, personal experience and being a good listener.

 

If a person has any doubts about a person's intelligence after reading a number of their postings, it is them who isn't to up to speed on knowledge. A narcissist will always think they are right, and argue to the death because of their inferior thinking and attitude, even if they might be right sometimes. An Empath tries to help, and settle discussions amicably, because he understands how a person feels can mean more than what they are saying. He tries to see their side of the argument, even though it can be totally wrong, because his experiences may be different than the empath's.

 

Some here actually think others are stupid, without actually knowing them more than a few typed words in one or two topics. Again, you have to know a person for awhile, looking at what they have been saying over time, before you can even begin to judge. Even then, you yourself can be wrong and, thinking the other person is wrong, think they are stupid. This is what happens here, daily , because there are quite a few very disturbed people that post here, and most can tell who they are because they are usually only here to argue, troll if you like, instead of passing along advice that could be helpful. Some are so pigheaded in their beliefs that nothing, including facts, will change their minds. I'm the opposite of that. If a person is right, and has the facts to prove it, I listen. I know how smart I am, and where my limitations are. I've been a reader on many subjects, daily, for over 60 years, including psychology, so I know how people think, and react, to certain stimuli.

 

Saying a person is stupid without actually personally knowing them, for a long time, is a stupid assumption, period. I can see that some here aren't to bright, on certain subjects at least, but I won't call them stupid, because although they might not know anything about a particular subject, or just a little, they might know quite a lot about others, so I won't judge them. Look up my posts, then decide. Not one, two or three, but all of them. I don't make opinions because they mean so little. When I comment, it's from research and experience, not opinions or from others opinions but fact based research. I also don't lie because what's the point? This isn't an ego forum, or a teenage pissing contest, although some seem to make it that way.

Thank you Fred, a very good post. Now let's get back to anti-biotics.

Edited 16 minutes ago by KannikaP

[jerrymahoney]

36 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

I've been a reader on many subjects, daily, for over 60 years, including psychology, so I know how people think, and react, to certain stimuli.