Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

It says that EVs are great for some lifestyles, not so ideal for others.  If I ever become a 2 car family again (of me, myself and I), my primary car will be an EV.  Because they're ideal for 80% of my usage.  But totally unsuited for that other 20%, based on current infrastructure and my occasional road trips to the boondocks.

 

Until the infrastructure matures, I'll stick with ICE because it meets 99% of my needs.  I still need to occasionally hire a big truck for moving stuff, even with a van in the USA and a pickup in Thailand.

 

But I don't hate EVs.  I'm cheering them on, and hoping the technologies catch on for other uses.  Like (for example) charging the car at night when the electricity is cheap, and using it to power the house when rates skyrocket during peak times.  That could save a lot of us $100's on electricity every month, even if it seldom leaves the driveway.  For others, it's not a benefit.

 

Absolutely. And I concur. What gets my goat is some of the EV militants who think their lifestyle is all that exists. If I were to drive largely in town or just take short hops, no question, EV's are far superior.

Posted
On 9/30/2024 at 12:18 PM, MalcolmB said:

The climate deniers love pointing out that electric cars depreciate.

While ignoring that all cars depreciate.

They are not very bright generally. 

 

I would hesitate to label those opposed to electric vehicles (EVs) as climate deniers, as such a generalization reflects poorly on the one making it as do sweeping generalizations of any such manner. 

 

That said, my primary concern about EVs relates to their retained value once the battery warranty expires.

 

I am open to hearing factual insights regarding any depreciation or stability in value at that point.

 

While I have encountered articles suggesting that EVs do not experience a significant drop in value after the warranty ends, I would appreciate more substantial evidence before committing to an EV - Though as the competition grows EV’s are starting look like a far more viable option, especially Bangkok and my next car is likely to be an EV. 

 

 

That said - from another perspective China coal extraction & consumption has increase by 3x over the past decade (no link to that as I’m on my phone, but factual articles are out there highlighting this). 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

I would hesitate to label those opposed to electric vehicles (EVs) as climate deniers,

I didn’t say that

Posted
41 minutes ago, UWEB said:

Since 5 month I have my EV now and have driven 6500 km. In the first two month I have had no own Wall Charger at home and had to use public Chargers and payed 2.700 THB for 2500 km driving. For the other 4000 km I used my own Charger connected to my Solar, so I paid nothing at all.

My last ICEV would have cost ~฿6400 to drive 2500 kms

If charging at home @ ฿5 / kWh, our EV would cost ... ~฿1600

฿2700 @ CS ... not bad at all, considering the alterative  ~฿6400

Also charge at home w/excess solar 👍

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

My last ICEV would have cost ~฿6400 to drive 2500 kms

If charging at home @ ฿5 / kWh, our EV would cost ... ~฿1600

฿2700 @ CS ... not bad at all, considering the alterative  ~฿6400

Also charge at home w/excess solar 👍

 

And so what? 

 

My wife pays big fat zero for gas. She gets refunded in full every month by her company. Also insurance. One of the reasons why she won't switch to electric. Charging at home is not a reality for many.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Electric car sales are crashing low all over the world. Nobody in Europe wants to switch to electric plainly because that these cars will be useless after multiple charging cycles of the batteries. Not to forget the drop in the charge in the harsh cold climates anywhere. An EV may claim say to run 500 or 600 km with one charge. But keep in mind that this capacity drops as fast as the temperatures can drop in harsh winters of the west. Really not a good deal for the moment to switch EV. Sales are dwindling all over the world as consumers are aware that for the moment it is not a good deal. Sorry.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, KhunLA said:

Well ... like you said ... so what ?

 

If some company said, we'll give you a free car, gas, insurance, just put in your 40 hrs a week for us ... .think I'd say shove it.  I have a BEV & Solar ... :cheesy:

 

That's one pineapple & beef steak comparison ... 😎

What ever spin works for you.

 

It is absolutely the same comparison ad you charging at home.

 

And that map of yours is not based in reality. Wifey drives to Chonburi/Rayong once a week to visit customers and if there are any charging stations they are not on the way. If she was driving electric she would get fired.

Edited by Celsius
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Celsius said:

 

It is absolutely the same comparison ad you charging at home.

Seriously ... I did a simple cost comparison. 

 

You did a lifestyle comparison.   Just a wee bit different.  Now for a fair (almost) comparison.

 

You have a choice of 2 cars ...

... identical buy in cost

... same comfort level

... same performance level (being kind)

 

BUT ... one cost at least 2X to operate & maintain, which would you take ?

Edited by KhunLA
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Celsius said:

 

And so what? 

 

My wife pays big fat zero for gas. She gets refunded in full every month by her company. Also insurance. One of the reasons why she won't switch to electric. Charging at home is not a reality for many.

 

8 minutes ago, Celsius said:

 

It is absolutely the same comparison ad you charging at home.

 

And that map of yours is not based in reality. Wifey drives to Chonburi/Rayong once a week to visit customers and if there are any charging stations they are not on the way. If she was driving electric she would get fired.

What complete nonsense and utter rubbish. If I was still working and my company was paying for my petrol, of course I would drive a petrol car. On the other hand, if my company was paying for my electricity bill at home, which was in fact the case and not for my petrol, then I would drive an EV. 
 

Just because your “wifey” visits customers in the middle of nowhere where they are probably burning kerosene in oil lamps for light doesn’t mean that there aren’t PTT, PT and Bangchak charging stations along the way. And if doesn’t see any charging stations, it’s probably because she isn’t looking for one (why would she?) or visually challenged, to say the least.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, SingAPorn said:

Electric car sales are crashing low all over the world. Nobody in Europe wants to switch to electric plainly because that these cars will be useless after multiple charging cycles of the batteries. Not to forget the drop in the charge in the harsh cold climates anywhere. An EV may claim say to run 500 or 600 km with one charge. But keep in mind that this capacity drops as fast as the temperatures can drop in harsh winters of the west. Really not a good deal for the moment to switch EV. Sales are dwindling all over the world as consumers are aware that for the moment it is not a good deal. Sorry.

If EV sales are crashing all over the world, why does the US want to impose a 100% tariff on Chinese made EVs and the EU imposing over 40% tariffs? 
 

Cleverer people than you have done research and tests to show that modern EV batteries have a useful life of over 5,000 cycles. This easily covers a period of over 12 years by which time, the car (not the battery) has probably reached its end of life.

 

I would be glad if Thailand would have a colder climate. Sadly though, the coldest it ever gets, realistically, is about 16 degrees C. I actually think an EV battery would love this cooler temperature.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, UWEB said:

image.png.bed3d9e6e3d372ff2fa81878ec917e91.png

Since 5 month I have my EV now and have driven 6500 km. In the first two month I have had no own Wall Charger at home and had to use public Chargers and payed 2.700 THB for 2500 km driving. For the other 4000 km I used my own Charger connected to my Solar, so I paid nothing at all.

 

Your solar install was free..... Amazing.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Celsius said:

 

And so what? 

 

My wife pays big fat zero for gas. She gets refunded in full every month by her company. Also insurance. One of the reasons why she won't switch to electric. Charging at home is not a reality for many.

I'd buy an EV for the novelty value but similar to your wife... My employer gives me a fuel with 10k allowance each month, pays for my insurance and vehicle servicing.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, impulse said:

 

But I don't hate EVs.  I'm cheering them on, and hoping the technologies catch on for other uses.  Like (for example) charging the car at night when the electricity is cheap, and using it to power the house when rates skyrocket during peak times.  That could save a lot of us $100's on electricity every month, even if it seldom leaves the driveway.  For others, it's not a benefit.

 


Actually there’s a TOU ( Time of use ) meter that can be installed which will provide electricity at 2.6 baht/kilowatt on off peak hours ( 10.00 pm to 9.00 am Mon thru Fri and all day on Sat/Sun and public holidays.

I have one purely designated for my EV.

But there’s a regular poster on here who charges his car with solar during daylight hours and uses the car to power his house at nighttime.

  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, SingAPorn said:

Nobody in Europe wants to switch to electric plainly because that these cars will be useless after multiple charging cycles of the batteries.

 

what complete nonsense! who told you that? did you come up with this on your own?

 

modern batteries, such as lithium-ion, typically last between 2,000 to 4,000 charge cycles before their capacity degrades (to about 70%).

this results in a range of 600,000 km or more. even after so many charge cycles, the car remains fully functional and can continue to drive

reliably for many years after. a 70% capacity is still more than sufficient for most daily use (e.g., 450 km x 70% = 315 km).

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, MalcolmB said:
3 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

I would hesitate to label those opposed to electric vehicles (EVs) as climate deniers,

I didn’t say that

 

Correct - you didn't say (write) that 'exact statement' if you wish to get technical. 

 

You wrote.. 

[The climate deniers love pointing out that electric cars depreciate.

While ignoring that all cars depreciate.

They are not very bright generally. ]

 

 

- Which implies, a link between climate deniers and those who'd argue against EV's...

Perhaps your writing is so poor you were unable to disassociate the two separate points in your comments, or the association was as deliberate as your accusation... ergo implying those who don't support EV's are not very bright, generally'..... 

 

Nevertheless, it was another one of your 'generally' not very bright' generalisations...     

 

 

 

I read the comment and the 'top line and author was scrolled off the page'...  I thought, what fool wrote this'...     there was no surprise when I scrolled up the page !!! 

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
40 minutes ago, UWEB said:

Solar was installed to supply power for my two Houses, Pool and Irrigation System. To charge the Car is just a Bonus. Amazing... isn't it?

indeed amazing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...