Jump to content

Trump's Pre-Election Strategy: Preparing to Challenge the 2024 Results


Social Media

Recommended Posts

image.png

 

As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Donald Trump is building a comprehensive narrative to contest the outcome if he loses. Through a combination of public speeches, posts on Truth Social, and over 100 preemptive lawsuits, Trump appears poised to reject the results, echoing his efforts from 2020.

 

In 2020, Trump's attempts to overturn the election results, whether through legal means or more extreme actions, took much of the country by surprise. But this time, Trump has made it clear that he's laying the groundwork ahead of time, leaving little room for shock should he lose and contest the results again.

 

Recently, Trump's attacks on voting procedures in the U.S. have intensified. He has cast doubt on various aspects of the electoral process, especially in the lead-up to a critical election that could potentially result in his return to the White House or, if he loses, criminal consequences including jail time.

 

Illustration of a voting booth with a siren on top.

 

On the subject of overseas voting, Trump made a baseless claim that Democrats were exploiting voting programs meant for expats and military members. According to Trump, this was a way to circumvent "any citizenship check or verification of identity." Meanwhile, during a rally in Pennsylvania, Trump criticized early voting, calling it a "stupid" concept and linking it to conspiracy theories about his loss in the state four years ago. Mail-in voting, another frequent target of Trump's attacks, has also been in his crosshairs. He recently accused the U.S. Postal Service of being unreliable and untrustworthy, even as Republicans continue to encourage their base to use mail-in ballots.

 

Fueling his rhetoric is the issue of undocumented migrants, which has been central to Trump's campaign. He has tied this to new voter fraud conspiracies, suggesting that millions of migrants crossing into the U.S. during the Biden administration could influence the election. Earlier this month, Trump urged House Republicans to use the threat of a government shutdown as leverage to pass a law requiring proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. Though this effort failed, it gave Trump and his allies a fresh talking point, despite the fact that non-citizen voting is already illegal and rare.

 

Even without concrete evidence of voter fraud, Trump is preparing a broader argument that the election will be inherently unfair. He has accused Democrats of "cheating" by hypothetically swapping out President Biden for Vice President Kamala Harris. Furthermore, Trump has claimed that criminal prosecutions against him amount to "lawfare," a tactic Democrats are using to undermine his candidacy.

 

"If there was no cheating — if God came down from on high and said 'I'm going to be your vote tabulator for this election,' I would leave this podium right now," Trump declared at a rally in Pennsylvania. "We have to have a landslide because they cheat so damn much."

 

Since his loss in 2020, the Republican Party has made significant changes to align itself with Trump's narrative of election fraud. His campaign and the Republican National Committee have established a network of around 175,000 volunteer poll watchers and workers, all in the name of ensuring "election integrity." In Georgia, where Trump lost by a narrow margin in 2020, a hard-right election board has implemented new rules that some Democrats worry could be used to undermine confidence in the state's results if Trump loses again.

 

House Speaker Mike Johnson, a staunch Trump ally, recently sparked controversy when he pledged to certify the 2024 election results only if it is a "free, fair, and safe election," hinting at the potential for disputes over the legitimacy of the process.

 

The 2020 election night strategy may also make a return. On November 1, 2020, Axios reported that Trump had privately told confidants he would declare victory on election night if early results showed him ahead, regardless of the actual outcome. True to form, Trump did just that. Given the likelihood that it will once again take days to determine the winner, it wouldn't be surprising if Trump follows the same playbook in 2024.

 

Based on a report from: AXIOS 2024-10-01

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Posts using derogatory and toxic nicknames or intentional misspelling of people’s names will be removed. If you don’t want your post to be removed, spell people’s names correctly, this applies to both sides of the political debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posts using derogatory and toxic nicknames or intentional misspelling of people’s names will be removed. If you don’t want your post to be removed, spell people’s names correctly, this applies to both sides of the political debate.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

What??? Is this true?? .....So all of these people below were what? Mistaken, lying?....or were they correct and the deep state plus 60 judges have tricked us all into thinking the election wasn't stolen.....

 

 

 

### 1. **Donald Trump**
   

### 2. **Rudy Giuliani**
  

### 3. **Sidney Powell**
   

### 4. **Mike Lindell**
 

### 5. **Steve Bannon**
 

### 6. **Lin Wood**
 

### 7. **Tucker Carlson**
 

### 8. **Newsmax and OANN (One America News Network)**
 

### 9. **Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene**
 

### 10. **Representative Matt Gaetz**
 

 

If you were polite you would say they  were mistaken. Slightly more aggressive you would say lying. For an honest assessment though you would say they all have an agenda to benefit themselves and that's really all they care about. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TRUMP IS A GREAT LEADER.......... A great CULT leader!  He has unquestionably proven his ability to suck in tens of millions of Americans to follow him like sheep. That's not much of a presidential legacy.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Tug said:

Fine slap big mouth with a gag order till the cases are adjucated or better yet throw the fraud in prison for his 34 felony convictions…….no more tolerance for his lies!

There are no convictions until the appeal process is over and all the Marxist <deleted> done to him by the Marxist Democrats will be over turned on the appeals.   Thank God I am not a Democrat with a mind like you.  He is not going to 2024 turn into another 2020.  Smart man.  Not going to happen again.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no doubt that if he loses he will contest it, after all this is not a man of grace or dignity, and he knows nothing of fair play. He has he spent his entire career engaging in malpractice, fraud, scams, and lies, so one can only expect that from this man, when he most likely loses next month. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, rudi49jr said:

It’s what Republicans/MAGA do: when they win, everything is hunky-dory, but when they lose, the election surely must have been rigged. Go figure. What happened to taking your loss like a man/woman, congratulating the winner and moving on?

I guess it shows that he's not much of a man. 

 

 

14 hours ago, billd766 said:

The advantage of telling the truth every time is that you only have to remember the truth. 

The disadvantage in telling lies, is that you have to remember which lie you told to whom and when you told it, and you can't afford to change that lie because there are always people who will quote your previous lie at you.

 

In the TV series Veep, the press sec lost his campaign diary, and when asked what info was in it, he explained that they were telling so many lies that he had to write down the truth to remember what it was. 

For a real-life incident, a week or two ago Nikki Haley posed a public question to Vance regarding all the idiocy he's been spouting: "do you want to lose?"

 

Another thing about strategy: it used to be that candidates wanted people to vote for them, they wanted to be liked just long enough for a person to pull the lever for them.  But now, well, it's hard to express, so I'll give an example: Kari Lake, a MAGA hopeful who keeps loosing elections (because they are all stolen, of course) addressed a rally a few days prior to one of the elections and said "If you were a John McCain supporter GET OUT, I don't want you!"  I don't get it, you want people to vote for you or are you recruiting for a cult?  Same thing with DT, how is this tactic of insulting and threatening groups of people supposed to get him elected?

(*note:  McCain was a US senator from her state, who ran against Obama in 2008)

 

But yes, Harris winning the vote is only half the task, the second is getting it past a corrupt Supreme Court, their decision will be dictated by the money men (Crow, and the other people we never hear of) .  I suspect it'll be more of a replay of the 2000 debacle.

 

Edited by bendejo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...