Jump to content









Spreaders of Conspiracy Theories: Unmasking the Motivations Behind the Lies


Social Media

Recommended Posts


50 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

How shallow. And Wikpedia, heavens. God forbid you read a book.

 

I guess you arent familiar with what the National Socialist platform was. Nor Leninism and Stalinism.

Why don't you read the Wikipedia article? Hypertext (as in HTML, right?) is extremely useful for following links, sources, updates, questionable entries etc etc. You don't get that from your Right Wing hand book for arguing on public forums, or Trolling for Beginners, or Ignorance, where do I sign up handbook, now do you?

 

The Wikipedia article on the Nazi party strangely enough does go into that, but because you refuse to read any "leftist, woke, libtard" links, you'll never know. So what books do you recommend I read? Nazism 101? Stalinism for beginners? How I learned to love Lenin and never look back?

 

The National Socialist party was set up to counter the Marxist Leninism version of socialism. Even though Russia and Germany were allies at the outset of WWII (the Ribbentrop/Molotov pact was a non aggression pact they invaded Poland), it didn't last long, when Hitler decided to invade Russia. Nazis and communists (Marxist Leninists) ripped each other to shreds later, quite literally. They remain to this day sworn enemies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The 2016 election was scheduled according to the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

 

What conspiracy turns Trump into Hitler?

I read it as heavily ironic, not to be taken literally!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Comparing him literally? Explain!

I'm sure you are intelligent enough to work it out for yourself ?   but just a hint refer to the post directly above yours in this very thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, johng said:

I'm sure you are intelligent enough to work it out for yourself ?   but just a hint refer to the post directly above yours in this very thread.

I replied to the reply to that one. My comment was addressed to you. Comparing him literally as opposed to comparing him what? Roughly? Vaguely? Allegorically? Indirectly? Approximately?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, bradiston said:

My comment was addressed to you. Comparing him literally as opposed to comparing him what? Roughly? Vaguely? Allegorically? Indirectly? Approximately?

I have not referred to him as Hilter  others have on many occasions

literally, roughly, vaguely, allegorically,indirectly and approximately

tried to tie Trump to Hitler  I suggested we call those persons "conspiracy theorist"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, johng said:

I have not referred to him as Hilter  others have on many occasions

literally, roughly, vaguely, allegorically,indirectly and approximately

tried to tie Trump to Hitler  I suggested we call those persons "conspiracy theorist"

Point taken. He's obviously not Hitler, at least not the last time I checked. But his rants about immigrants being a subspecies - Hitler's phrase was "untermensch" - and somehow genetically infected/inferior, are Hitlerian.  If Trump was talking about Jews in this language, I would be very surprised if his phone didn't blow off his other ear. He'd be arrested for racially motivated hate speech. I posted a link to a source that ran a piece on his ravings. It was on Al Jazeera.

 

https://aje.io/4rx0oj

Edited by bradiston
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Point taken. He's obviously not Hitler, at least not the last time I checked. But his rants about immigrants being a subspecies - Hitler's phrase was "untermensch" - and somehow genetically infected/inferior, are Hitlerian.  If Trump was talking about Jews in this language, I would be very surprised if his phone didn't blow off his other ear. He'd be arrested for racially motivated hate speech. I posted a link to a source that ran a piece on his ravings. It was on Al Jazeera.

 

https://aje.io/4rx0oj

Wrong link.

 

https://aje.io/3o3vl9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

9 hours ago, bradiston said:

 It's Arabs and Muslims who have borne the brunt of hate crimes since October 7th, just as they did after 9/11. T

 

No, you are mistaken.  There are far more hate crimes aimed at Jews compared to Arabs amd Muslims in the U.S.  

 

"The following data about anti-Jewish and religiously-biased hate crimes in the United States has been excerpted from the annual Report on Hate Crimes released by the Uniform Crime Reporting Program of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

The data for 2023 came from 16,009 law enforcement agencies. The totals show 11,862 hate crime incidents involving 13,829 related offenses were reported, affecting 13,857 victims. Incidents of religious bias represented 24% of the total – 2,699 incidents and 2,967 offenses affecting 3,121 victims. The largest categories of religion included:

  • Anti-Jewish incidents: 68%
  • Anti-Islamic incidents: 9%
  • Anti-Sikh incidents: 5%
  • Anti-Catholic incidents: 3%

Overall, 14% of all victims are Jews, and 66% of all religious hate crime victims are Jews."    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/statistics-on-religious-hate-crimes

 

A section of the chart  on antisemitic hate crimes:

 

Screenshot2024-10-08032400.png.6d943cd1c73f96893c901865363f5218.png

 

Keep in mind there are an estimated 5.8 million Jews in the U.S., or 2.4% of the U.S. population.  On a proportional basis, Jews are twice as likely to experience a hate crime than Blacks.  It's also important to note that most hate crimes directed towars Jews are crimes against property, such as swastikas painted on synagogues or homes. The inverted triangle is a symbol used to mark prisoners in Nazi concentration camps and has been adopted by Hamas to mark Jewish targets.  Pro-Palestinian groups in the U.S. use it as well.

 

GP4XWZvW4AAIWy2.jpg.e91e3d180ddd6edaf67b08398734966c.jpg

 

However,  Jews who wear clothing that makes them "visibly Jewish,"  whether a skullcap (kippa, yarmulke) or full ultra orthodox dress, have increasingly become the targets of physical violence,especially in NYC.

 

8 hours ago, bradiston said:

The Jews were being given a hard time in Europe since way back when - the 14th century? 

 

It goes back further than that:

 

"In the first millennium of the Christian era, leaders in the European Christian (Catholic) hierarchy developed or solidified as doctrine ideas that: all Jews were responsible for the crucifixion of Christ; the destruction of the Temple by the Romans and the scattering of the Jewish people was punishment both for past transgressions and for continued failure to abandon their faith and accept Christianity.  In the tenth and eleventh centuries, these doctrines about Jews were hardened ..."     https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/antisemitism-in-history-from-the-early-church-to-1400

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

 

 

No, you are mistaken.  There are far more hate crimes aimed at Jews compared to Arabs amd Muslims in the U.S.  

 

"The following data about anti-Jewish and religiously-biased hate crimes in the United States has been excerpted from the annual Report on Hate Crimes released by the Uniform Crime Reporting Program of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

The data for 2023 came from 16,009 law enforcement agencies. The totals show 11,862 hate crime incidents involving 13,829 related offenses were reported, affecting 13,857 victims. Incidents of religious bias represented 24% of the total – 2,699 incidents and 2,967 offenses affecting 3,121 victims. The largest categories of religion included:

  • Anti-Jewish incidents: 68%
  • Anti-Islamic incidents: 9%
  • Anti-Sikh incidents: 5%
  • Anti-Catholic incidents: 3%

Overall, 14% of all victims are Jews, and 66% of all religious hate crime victims are Jews."    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/statistics-on-religious-hate-crimes

 

A section of the chart  on antisemitic hate crimes:

 

Screenshot2024-10-08032400.png.6d943cd1c73f96893c901865363f5218.png

 

Keep in mind there are an estimated 5.8 million Jews in the U.S., or 2.4% of the U.S. population.  On a proportional basis, Jews are twice as likely to experience a hate crime than Blacks.  It's also important to note that most hate crimes directed towars Jews are crimes against property, such as swastikas painted on synagogues or homes. The inverted triangle is a symbol used to mark prisoners in Nazi concentration camps and has been adopted by Hamas to mark Jewish targets.  Pro-Palestinian groups in the U.S. use it as well.

 

GP4XWZvW4AAIWy2.jpg.e91e3d180ddd6edaf67b08398734966c.jpg

 

However,  Jews who wear clothing that makes them "visibly Jewish,"  whether a skullcap (kippa, yarmulke) or full ultra orthodox dress, have increasingly become the targets of physical violence,especially in NYC.

 

 

It goes back further than that:

 

"In the first millennium of the Christian era, leaders in the European Christian (Catholic) hierarchy developed or solidified as doctrine ideas that: all Jews were responsible for the crucifixion of Christ; the destruction of the Temple by the Romans and the scattering of the Jewish people was punishment both for past transgressions and for continued failure to abandon their faith and accept Christianity.  In the tenth and eleventh centuries, these doctrines about Jews were hardened ..."     https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/antisemitism-in-history-from-the-early-church-to-1400

I said since October 7th, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Rummy explained it.  Sleight of hand...  To divert attention from $4 Trillion missing Pentagon dollars.

 

That's as good an explanation as any, but that would also require the perpetrators to know exactly when the planes would hit the towers.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, johng said:

Rubbish  he published information obtained by whistle blowers  exposing horrendous crimes  that governments tried to suppress...he paid a hefty price  for his audacity  as did the "freedom of the press"

 He was not and has never been a journalist. He was a hacker who made his living from hacking. It was only after repeated run ins with the law and his cyber crime conviction that he transitioned to publishing stolen data.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I saw it and I agree that it was a controlled demolition. I just don't know why they would do it.

 

Wanting to believe in a controlled demolition does not mean that it occurred. There is no substantive evidence to support the the likelihood of  such an event.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2024 at 6:35 PM, frank83628 said:

Trump was taking the piss, if you had any sense of humour you might have known that. there was an obvious satirical AI image of swift endorsing him, the media ran with a lie and as usual you guys lapped every single bit of it up, your hatred of Trump is so much that you will happily believe everything you read about him.

here  are the images, do you think if Swift had actually endorsed him he would have just said 'i accept'?

you don't think he would have made a speech or formal post about it and thanked her?? 
gullible is politest word i san say here, surely you have more brains that this

Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 18.28.20.png

No they dont (have more brains than this).

They believe any MSM lies/distortion about Trump - because they need to hate him.

I read somewhere that many of them have 'Daddy Issues'. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2024 at 2:14 PM, Chomper Higgot said:

He didn’t not hand himself in, he absconded and hid.

 

There is no right to not answer a court summons and hence that was another law he broke.

 

 

Why are you grinding this axe? What's the point? This parrot is dead. It is no more. It has passed on. Assange is free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

No they dont (have more brains than this).

They believe any MSM lies/distortion about Trump - because they need to hate him.

I read somewhere that many of them have 'Daddy Issues'. 

You read somewhere? I read somewhere that all Trump supporters are ESN with IQs of less than 50. Can't remember where I read it. Probably on non MSM, if that exists for the toxic majority of Trump supporters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bradiston said:

You read somewhere? I read somewhere that all Trump supporters are ESN with IQs of less than 50. Can't remember where I read it. Probably on non MSM, if that exists for the toxic majority of Trump supporters.

Like I said - Daddy Issues.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2024 at 6:35 PM, frank83628 said:

Trump was taking the piss,


Get your cultures straight.

Taking the piss is a Brit thing, it goes over like dead donkey in the USA. Newscasters featured it in the US, as yet another instant of Trump being not just a liar, which everyone already knows, but a tasteless a-shoIe of a liar. 

  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...