Jump to content









Are You A Sexpat Or Do You Ride The Backwards Morality Train?


123Stodg

Recommended Posts


40 minutes ago, madone said:

 



Things change, deal with it.  The locals are certainly less tolerant than they were 30 years ago too.  

Because they do not have to anymore, and sick and tired of watching foreigners doing stupid deleted things, and make them even more ashamed of their own country. 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 1FinickyOne said:

You mean, anyone under 40? 

 

you're right, it's mostly dumb millennials and boomer chavs with those. GenZ seems to know better.

 

God, millennials are stupid. They really thought their job were forever. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Celsius said:

 

you're right, it's mostly dumb millennials and boomer chavs with those. GenZ seems to know better.

 

God, millennials are stupid. They really thought their job were forever. 

Retired retarded western mongers, are also something of itself

 

Living the life in the red light districst acting like superstars. 

 

and standard outfit  beer brand tank top, slippers, and cargo trunk shorts. 

Edited by Hummin
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Celsius said:

Why would Australian escort service use a picture of furum member's wife? Where on earth would they obtain such proto?

 

  Its a mystery .

A photo of a persons wife is also the same photo of an escort on an Australian website .

   I cannot work out how that could have happened .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  Its a mystery .

A photo of a persons wife is also the same photo of an escort on an Australian website .

   I cannot work out how that could have happened .

Many men is pimping their wife

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

 Are you suggesting that only the lower classes should be labelled as sexpats ?

 

Most of them are.Once again - at the risk of repeating myself - I'm not making any moral judgements.Aristocrats often have  very entertaining and energetic sex lives.

 

My observation is essentially one of aesthetics.There can few more horrible groups to behold than British Pattaya sexpats with their beer, football, ugliness (bodies, faces and voices). and most comically of all  their "gentlemens clubs"

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Was the mystery ever solved about that photo that BM2 took himself which ended up being used by an escort on an Australian website and did he manage to contact the escort and ask her to remove his wifes photo from the escorts advert ?

   Terrible behaviour from the escort in Australia pretending to be BM2s wife , could cause all kinds of confusion 

You'd have to pm me the photo, as I never saw that website and can't confirm true or false without actually seeing the photo.

 

But website's nick all sorts of photos, there was a photo of my rabbit featured on a French organic food website once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Yagoda said:

The lower the gutter is, the better it is for me. Being retired and single means you never have to apologize for the fact that you have three reasonably priced 20 year old hardbodies in your room with vibrators while Two Girls, One Cup plays on continuous loop and one of the Burka babes from down on Soi 4 ululates madly. 

 

Room Service! More greasy bacon and oatmeal. Screw baby oil P. Diddy is a wimp next to me.


All your speaking in tongues is too confusing, but a picture is worth 1,000 words. Post photos with circles and arrows so we can get a better understanding of your claims. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RSD1 said:


All your speaking in tongues is too confusing, but a picture is worth 1,000 words. Post photos with circles and arrows so we can get a better understanding of your claims. 

Im a gentleman. Gentlemen dont post pictures

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Im a gentleman. Gentlemen dont post pictures


The way you describe yourself, describe your appearance, and the stories you post about what you like to get up to, I must admit, gentleman isn't exactly the first word that came to mind.  So please excuse me for my ignorance. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RSD1 said:


The way you describe yourself, describe your appearance, and the stories you post about what you like to get up to, I must admit, gentleman isn't exactly the first word that came to mind.  So please excuse me for my ignorance. 😂

Gentleman cant be repulsively ugly and fat? What a bigot!

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Gentleman cant be repulsively ugly and fat? What a bigot!


You can be anything you want. You can even be a nutter who votes for Trump. Doesn't matter one bit to me.

 

In fact, this whole topic is about not judging people or attaching stereotypical names based on what people do on their own to be happy. So I would never refer to you as repulsively ugly, or fat, or anything else along those lines for that matter. But the image that you paint of yourself doesn't quite resonate with the word gentleman in my opinion, based purely upon your own depictions of yourself of course.
 

So it was simply an observation and not a bigot laden judgment. But "gentleman" it is if that makes you happy. I am even be pleased to refer to you as "boss", "sir", "chief", "captain, or "squire" if you prefer any one or all of those titles instead. 
 

Edited by RSD1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, RSD1 said:


You can be anything you want. You can even be a nutter who votes for Trump. Doesn't matter one bit to me. In fact, this whole topic is about not judging people or attaching stereotypical names based on what people do on their own to be happy. So I would never refer to you as repulsively ugly, or fat, or anything else for that matter. But the image that you paint of yourself doesn't quite resonate with the word gentleman, based purely upon your own depictions of yourself of course. So it was simply an observation and not a bigot laden judgment. But "gentleman" it is if that makes you happy. I am even be pleased to refer to you as "boss", "sir", "chief", "captain, or "squire" if you prefer any one or all of those titles instead. 
 

I am a nutter who voted for Trump. I proudly wear the title, Scumbag, as you proudly wear your bigot one. After all, those who oppose Trump are essentially bigots.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yagoda said:

I am a nutter who voted for Trump. I proudly wear the title, Scumbag, as you proudly wear your bigot one. After all, those who oppose Trump are essentially bigots.


Is it possible to be a scumbag and a gentleman all at the same time? I didn't know that. I'm only asking because you have been so enlightening lately and I've been learning so much from you in these recent moments. 
 

But I'm not a bigot at all. Not in any sense of the word. You are also name calling now which isn't very becoming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, so much virtue signaling in one thread! No doubt there’s a special place somewhere up there in a floating celestial country club ready to welcome all those pure-of-mind-and-body types visiting this thread.

 

And who knew there were so many guys who came to Thailand as single men just for the temples! Pay attention TAT; you’ve got your draw. Wats and wats of them!

 

As a lad back home, I did a good bit of dallying with the fairer sex. At university, working as a lifeguard at a large ocean beach in uni summers, and then when I entered the workforce, I certainly had more than my fair share of lovelies. I guess that is largely okay, save for among those who subscribe to certain superstitions about a final accounting for one’s life and dallying when one cannot pretend it’s love and intended on procreation. Since they were ‘my people’ and on home turf, I guess that’s respectable, like a Thai politician with a mia noi and a uni student on the side. Of course, there were a few visiting foreign students, too, whom I experienced back home…did I commit an infraction with the Danes and Israelis and French? If so, mea culpa. I didn’t have a rule book. I even went across racial lines. Bad boy!

 

On my visits to Thailand, I guess I brought my complete lack of sanctimonious Kristian morality with me, perhaps painfully unaware that one accumulates bonus points in life for abstaining from pleasures of the flesh. I guess I’ll have no points to cash in when I take my last breath. Woe is me! What will I do in the box for all eternity!

 

Now my experience---which seems to differ markedly from many here---is that it is as easy to experience carnal joy in Thailand as it was back home. Who knew people might be the same worldwide! Who knew people far and wide like to dally and release oxytocin!

 

Where I’m still puzzled is the difference between women who will accompany me back to my condo, or me to theirs, on a first date, vs women who expect to receive compensation for doing the same. Horny is okay, but capitalism is bad? The difference is probably too subtle for this obtuse guy. And is 2nd or 3rd date better and acceptable? Since “love” is chemical based and largely undefinable, who’s to say when we dally out of love, and thus pass the border into the zone of moral rectitude, vs instinctual rutting? Experts, self-proclaimed or otherwise, please chime in!!!!!

 

Now I’ve not settled down with a Thai woman, despite the fact I have now chosen to live here and operate a business. If I ever decide to settle down, I really could not care less what the woman’s past is….brain surgeon, 7-11 cashier, or bargirl. I’m not a virgin, so it would be hypocritical of me to expect she should be. Anyway, I remember when I dallied with a virgin or two back when I first began to play the game of life, and it wasn’t exactly breathtaking and romantically memorable. Also, I know full well I was born lucky, and never walked in her flip flops. I cannot judge what she has done nor why, I can only take a chance on what she will be, and how she will behave from the point we commit solely to each other. I really don’t think her past has any bearing on how she will behave in the future. Marriages of all types are hurt by infidelity, no matter her profession...lawyer or demimondaine. I’m also confident enough in my own masculinity that I wouldn’t worry if some previous partner provided her more pleasure. I would just do my job in the best way I know how, and ideally, we’ll both enjoy.

 

Anyway, you do you...or is that onanism?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RSD1 said:


Is it possible to be a scumbag and a gentleman all at the same time? I didn't know that. I'm only asking because you have been so enlightening lately and I've been learning so much from you in these recent moments. 
 

But I'm not a bigot at all. Not in any sense of the word. You are also name calling now which isn't very becoming.

Got it. Nutter to a Trump supporter. Bigot to a bigot. Name calling.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...