Kamala Harris Defends Policy Stance in Heated Fox News Interview

[Yagoda]

25 minutes ago, bendejo said:

Fox edited the enemy within clip.  Caught red-handed.  She wouldn't let Baier snow her when she called him on it.  She's got guts. 

That station goes out of their way to make DT look good, and he doesn't like it, he'll double down on what he said, brushing aside the Fox editorializing.  Don't they get embarrassed?

 

 

Guess you were watching the interview with the sound off and Joy Reid doing commentary.

[dinsdale]

 

[dinsdale]

7 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

Fox runs an entertainment channel.

As opposed to this highly intellectual bunch of woke idiots you mean?

[Tug]

13 minutes ago, proton said:

You would have to be a fool, a traitor or an extreme Trump hater to vote for this failed woman, clearly way out of her depth.

How so ?I watched the entire interview Harris handeled herself well.Its  obvious she has experience in high pressure situations she did a fine job .Brett did his level best to make her look bad and failed.she got many of her points across quite well inspite of the hostile environment of the interview .now it beggers the question just were is big bad Donald?he would be a puddle on the floor blubbering and sobbing begging for mercy if he was interviewed in the same way.actually he would insult the interviewer then run away.

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Opinions differ.

 

Voting is underway.

Yea, I voted. Whats your opinion of her performance, foreigner?

[Yagoda]

12 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

As opposed to this highly intellectual bunch of woke idiots you mean?

Thanks I just lost my breakfast

[Yagoda]

13 minutes ago, Tug said:

How so ?I watched the entire interview Harris handeled herself well.Its  obvious she has experience in high pressure situations she did a fine job .Brett did his level best to make her look bad and failed.she got many of her points across quite well inspite of the hostile environment of the interview .now it beggers the question just were is big bad Donald?he would be a puddle on the floor blubbering and sobbing begging for mercy if he was interviewed in the same way.actually he would insult the interviewer then run away.

She did a fine job🤣. You are now combining your Anti Trump incoherent obsession with self delusion.

[Hanaguma]

14 minutes ago, Tug said:

How so ?I watched the entire interview Harris handeled herself well.Its  obvious she has experience in high pressure situations she did a fine job .Brett did his level best to make her look bad and failed.she got many of her points across quite well inspite of the hostile environment of the interview .now it beggers the question just were is big bad Donald?he would be a puddle on the floor blubbering and sobbing begging for mercy if he was interviewed in the same way.actually he would insult the interviewer then run away.

You have a short memory. It was yesterday that the head of...Bloomberg?... had a much longer and intense interview with Trump in Chicago. Lots of tough questions, Trump tried bobbing and weaving at times, it was good journalism.

 

Now, here.   Kamala shows up late, looks like a deer in the headlights most of the time, runs away as soon as she can. She was invited to do Bloomberg as well, and declined. 

[dinsdale]

5 minutes ago, Tug said:

How so ?I watched the entire interview Harris handeled herself well.Its  obvious she has experience in high pressure situations she did a fine job .Brett did his level best to make her look bad and failed.she got many of her points across quite well inspite of the hostile environment of the interview .now it beggers the question just were is big bad Donald?he would be a puddle on the floor blubbering and sobbing begging for mercy if he was interviewed in the same way.actually he would insult the interviewer then run away.

She got her points across but failed to answer direct questions. This time it wasn't "I was born in a middle class ......" it was look at Trump did. Just look at the 1st question about immigration. She doesn't answer a simple and direct question.

HOW MANY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

0:22

WOULD YOU ESTIMATE YOUR

0:23

ADMINISTRATION HAS RELEASED INTO

0:25

THE COUNTRY OVER THE LAST THREE

0:26

AND A HALF YEARS?

0:27

>> WELL, I'M GLAD YOU RAISED THE

0:29

ISSUE OF IMMIGRATION BECAUSE I

0:31

AGREE WITH YOU, IT IS A -- IT IS

0:33

A TOPIC OF DISCUSSION THAT

0:34

PEOPLE WANT TO RIGHTLY HAVE.

0:37

AND YOU KNOW WHAT I'M GOING TO

0:38

TALK ABOUT.

0:39

>> Bret: JUST A NUMBER.

0:40

DO YOU THINK IT'S 1 MILLION?

0:42

3 MILLION?

0:42

>> BRET, LET'S JUST GET TO THE

0:44

POINTED, OKAY?

0:44

THE POINT IS THAT WE HAVE A

0:47

BROKEN IMMIGRATION SYSTEM THAT

0:48

NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED.

The rest of the interview continued in this vein with her avoiding answering any question. It was just pure political answer avoidance tactics.

[CallumWK]

2 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

She was invited to do Bloomberg as well, and declined. 

 

She chickens out of interviews.

I recall they always blame Trump for that, over and over again, until it get tiresome

[Chomper Higgot]

18 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Yea, I voted. Whats your opinion of her performance, foreigner?

What?

[proton]

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Opinions differ.

 

Voting is underway.

 

Very backward way of doing an election. Campaigning goes on for months. postal votes start weeks before, people can vote with no ID and takes days for the final result. Every country should do what the French do, no postals, all have to have ID and the result is known the next day.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, proton said:

 

Very backward way of doing an election. Campaigning goes on for months. postal votes start weeks before, people can vote with no ID and takes days for the final result. Every country should do what the French do, no postals, all have to have ID and the result is known the next day.

Nothing back area about it at all.

 

It increases voter participation, always a good thing.

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, BKKKevin said:

You obviously live in a Fox/Newsmax bubble…

 

I'm not going to watch a Telegraph VDO and you didn't explain what you said in intelligible English.

[proton]

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Nothing back area about it at all.

 

It increases voter participation, always a good thing.

 

Increases the opportunity for serial and fake voting and ballot stuffing

[thaibeachlovers]

43 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

 

That must be hurting the Harris supporters,

[proton]

39 minutes ago, Tug said:

How so ?I watched the entire interview Harris handeled herself well.Its  obvious she has experience in high pressure situations she did a fine job .Brett did his level best to make her look bad and failed.she got many of her points across quite well inspite of the hostile environment of the interview .now it beggers the question just were is big bad Donald?he would be a puddle on the floor blubbering and sobbing begging for mercy if he was interviewed in the same way.actually he would insult the interviewer then run away.

 

But she is part of a failed administration who said she would not have done anything different to Biden, they amongst other things let the country be flooded with illegal and dangerous immigrants. She is neither a fit or capable person to be president, despite how well or not she did with her rehearsed answers.

[Will B Good]

47 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

She chickens out of interviews.

I recall they always blame Trump for that, over and over again, until it get tiresome

 

So Trump is going ahead with the 60 Minutes interview?

[Captain Flack]

A racist comment has been removed, any more and a time out will follow.

 

Rule 15. You will not discriminate or post slurs, degrading or overly negative comments on the basis of race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, nationality, disability, medical history, marriage, civil partnership, pregnancy, maternity, paternity, gender identity, sexual orientation or any other irrelevant factor.

[Chomper Higgot]

31 minutes ago, proton said:

 

Increases the opportunity for serial and fake voting and ballot stuffing

No it isn’t, if it were you’d provide evidence.

[CallumWK]

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

So Trump is going ahead with the 60 Minutes interview?

 

Only if he gets the same favorable treatment as Kamala, in where they edit her word salad of not being able to answer question

[Will B Good]

1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

 

Only if he gets the same favorable treatment as Kamala, in where they edit her word salad of not being able to answer question

 

 

Oh boy.....would not want to be the editor on that number.....could take days.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

33 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

That must be hurting the Harris supporters,

Voter turnout is good for Democrats.

 

Which is why Republicans put so much effort into reducing turnout.

[Will B Good]

37 minutes ago, proton said:

 

Increases the opportunity for serial and fake voting and ballot stuffing

 

Presumably only by the Dems though?.......hence the extra 8.2 million votes last time.....that's a lot of stuffing.

[Eric Loh]

I think she did reasonable well in a hostile enviroment but her detractors will always deny that. I think her strategy to do interviews with conservative outlets and campaigning with Repubicans is brillant. With the election in just 3 weeks, most voters have locked in their decision but there are still small slivers of undecided voters who have supported Republicans in the past but uneasy with Trump and Republicans like the older voters who are disgusted with Trump's unhinged behavior and don't think he is fit for office. Her Fox's interview target those groups of voters and her interviews with podcaster like Joe Rogan will reached out to the male voters. Trump voters base has hit a ceiling and he is not broadening his voters base and he has lost the momentum. His rallies are boring and interviews are insane and he crumbles when tense. 

[dinsdale]

5 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Only if he gets the same favorable treatment as Kamala, in where they edit her word salad of not being able to answer question

0:51-2:08. Her original answer is just gibberish. No wonder they changed it. 

 

[proton]

6 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Presumably only by the Dems though?.......hence the extra 8.2 million votes last time.....that's a lot of stuffing.

 

Landslide Lyndon! they have been cheating at elections for decades

[Chomper Higgot]

2 minutes ago, proton said:

 

Landslide Lyndon! they have been cheating at elections for decades

So you will have no problem presenting g evidence to back this claim of yours.

[Will B Good]

5 minutes ago, proton said:

 

Landslide Lyndon! they have been cheating at elections for decades

 

Not very successfully....need to up their game to steal the next one.

 

The balance between Democrats and Republicans has been relatively even, though each party has had periods of dominance. Republicans held the presidency for 20 out of the 28 years between 1980 and 2008, while Democrats have won more frequently in recent elections.

[proton]

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

Not very successfully....need to up their game to steal the next one.

 

The balance between Democrats and Republicans has been relatively even, though each party has had periods of dominance. Republicans held the presidency for 20 out of the 28 years between 1980 and 2008, while Democrats have won more frequently in recent elections.

 

Even JFK cheated to win with the help of daddy's mafia contacts, of course somebody ill be asking for a link to prove it