Jump to content

  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 7

      Thailand Live Monday 21 October 2024

    2. 0

      Tour Bus Crash in Nakhon Ratchasima Injures 43

    3. 7

      Thailand Live Monday 21 October 2024

    4. 0

      5,600 People Accuse iCon Group of 1.6 Billion Baht Scam

    5. 7

      Thailand Live Monday 21 October 2024

    6. 7

      iCon Group Execs Still Stressed, No Smiles: Department of Corrections

    7. 41

      Thai father’s plea to find missing daughter and 262,000 baht

    8. 0

      Thai Parties Dismiss Election Commission's Investigation into Thaksin

    9. 6,619

      Australian Aged Pension

    10. 16

      N Korea Sends Troops to Support Russia in Ukraine: Seoul Warns of a "Grave Security Threat"

    11. 1

      Trump Claims Xi Jinping Respects Him Because He Knows He's ‘Crazy’

    12. 2,863

      Thai gov. to tax (remitted) income from abroad for tax residents starting 2024 - Part II

    13. 1,772

      What Movies or TV shows are you watching (2024)

    14. 33

      WrLife still ok?

Foreign Election Interference in the US 2024 Election!


Hanaguma

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, rasg said:

That's the most ridiculous thing I have read.

You'll find out exactly how much voter fraud took place in 2020 and IS taking place over the coming weeks,

Here we go again!

The BIG LIE 2.0.

Edited by Jingthing
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rasg said:

That's the most ridiculous thing I have read.

You'll find out exactly how much voter fraud took place in 2020 and IS taking place over the coming weeks,

Yes, the 2020 losing side is already starting with the rubbish . The next insurrection already in progress. Even if Trump wins they will cry fraud . “I did not win by enough “

Edited by Captain Monday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Dan O said:

Not sure what you consider an insurrection then if invading the Capitol with the express purpose of taking hostages and preventing the confirmation of the presidential appointment is not a insurrection. You may want to talk with the Proud Boys or Oath Keepers about your position as they may believe it. You can call it whatever you want and it won't change a thing that happened and won't save the orange idiot for his role in insighting it

You had to make it sound even sillier than it was. "Taking hostages!" 😂😂😂 If I was Kier Starmer, I would have said taking sausages which would probably be more accurate. I'm looking forward to the true numbers of FBI stooges who were in the crowd stirring the crowd up. They've refused to answer the question so far but it will come out soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

DNC, Clinton campaign agree to Steele dossier funding fine | AP News

 

So you now admit that Trump was never convicted of sexual abuse, much less rape likec you have been falsely claiming, 

 

Thank for coming clean, Feel better now? 

The only crime committed by Trump will be overturned on appeal as Jack Smith was found to have been improperly appointed by the DOJ. That judgement was by SCOTUS.

The same for all the others was that he was found liable for in stacked civil courts. All are dead in the water. No convictions or guilty decisions in civil courts.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

One jury found Trump guilty of felonies, another found Trump liable for sexual assault.

Correct. Felonies that have literally been Trumped up for Trump as they were nothing more than misdemeanours.

 

They had to change the law to bring the E Jean Carroll sexual assault case. She couldn’t even remember what month or even the year that it took place. Oh. I forgot. She has made the similar allegations several times before...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks are still using Wikipedia as a source? 

Wikipedia has been criticized for a number of reasons, including: 
Lack of formal review
Wikipedia doesn't have a formal process for reviewing content, which can lead to errors and inaccuracies. 
Vandalism
Anyone can change Wikipedia, and some editors intentionally make bad changes. 
Bias
Wikipedia articles can be biased, especially for controversial topics or articles about famous people. 
Unverifiable claims
Some articles don't have good sources, and unverifiable claims can remain. 
Hoaxes
Hoaxes can be published on Wikipedia, and it can take time to uncover them. For example, the Henry Batuta hoax was published for 15 months before being discovered. 
Poor writing
Many articles are not considered well-written, verifiable, or comprehensive. 
 
 
 
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, righand3256 said:

Folks are still using Wikipedia as a source? 

Wikipedia has been criticized for a number of reasons, including: 
Lack of formal review
Wikipedia doesn't have a formal process for reviewing content, which can lead to errors and inaccuracies. 
Vandalism
Anyone can change Wikipedia, and some editors intentionally make bad changes. 
Bias
Wikipedia articles can be biased, especially for controversial topics or articles about famous people. 
Unverifiable claims
Some articles don't have good sources, and unverifiable claims can remain. 
Hoaxes
Hoaxes can be published on Wikipedia, and it can take time to uncover them. For example, the Henry Batuta hoax was published for 15 months before being discovered. 
Poor writing
Many articles are not considered well-written, verifiable, or comprehensive. 
 
 
 

No, as a reference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...