Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This thread sounds like an old white man forum driven by fear, mistrust and  negativity somehow believing that candidate will change their lives for the better…probably not 

 

Successful people  don’t worry about the current political environmental…instead,  they are driven by family, peers, higher education and social causes…

 

we know their zip codes are very different than campaign attendees and those caught up in this political nonsense worrying about who wins…whether 4 or 12 years ago or 4 years from now, neither side will have a zip code change 

 

those who want to develop and improve their careers/lives will; those will want to be developed and expect their lives to improve based on extraneous factors will not

Posted
4 minutes ago, cardinalblue said:

This thread sounds like an old white man forum driven by fear, mistrust and  negativity somehow believing that candidate will change their lives for the better…probably not 

 

Successful people  don’t worry about the current political environmental…instead,  they are driven by family, peers, higher education and social causes…

 

we know their zip codes are very different than campaign attendees and those caught up in this political nonsense worrying about who wins…whether 4 or 12 years ago or 4 years from now, neither side will have a zip code change 

 

those who want to develop and improve their careers/lives will; those will want to be developed and expect their lives to improve based on extraneous factors will not

Do you believe that open borders and mass migration will not negatively affect your life? 

 

If so, you are ether wealthy, or a fool. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So?

 

She tried steal the election by getting electors to flip and still claims that the election was stolen and that he was an illegitimate President. 

 

Many more Clinton supporter rioting after Trump won, and Hillary said nothing to try and stop them. 

 

Your proof Hillary tried to switch electors?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

We shall see.... the bettors still see it at 60/40 for Trump.   

You understand that the gambling houses set the odds based on money bet on the two sides. The odds are in no way predictive.

 

It's a common misperception that betting odds in this situation reflect the possibilities of victory by one side or the other.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

You understand that the gambling houses set the odds based on money bet on the two sides. The odds are in no way predictive.

 

It's a common misperception that betting odds in this situation reflect the possibilities of victory by one side or the other.

Only if the betting is parimutuel. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Actually, no.

 

The "open borders and mass migrations" have not impacted me at all, except for keeping the prices of fruit and vegetables at the supermarket at reasonable prices.

So you agree the Biden-Harris administration opened the borders and have allowed mass migration, thanks for a bit of honesty. 

 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So you agree the Biden-Harris administration opened the borders and have allowed mass migration, thanks for a bit of honesty. 

 

 

How old are you?

  • Like 2
Posted

I'm looking for the early voting data for Michigan, broken down by county, to see if the Democratic counties are generating lots of votes, as is happening in Pennsylvania.

 

The Michigan site is tough to negotiate, but I can see that some Blue counties, such as Oakland and Ottawa, show big turnout.

 

The Trumpers here who are predicting victory based on betting sites, seem to be ignoring  actual voting data, probably because it gives them a sad.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

I'm looking for the early voting data for Michigan, broken down by county, to see if the Democratic counties are generating lots of votes, as is happening in Pennsylvania.

 

The Michigan site is tough to negotiate, but I can see that some Blue counties, such as Oakland and Ottawa, show big turnout.

 

The Trumpers here who are predicting victory based on betting sites, seem to be ignoring  actual voting data, probably because it gives them a sad.

 

Any comment about the 13 million early voting shortfall? 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cpdqw2yd00dt 

 

"As we reported earlier, a tracker, external maintained by the University of Florida shows nearly 17 million people have already voted, with early voting under way across more than half of US states.

So far, Democrats are currently leading with 45.3% of early votes while Republicans are currently at 33.4%, according to data from 24 states by party registration.

Previous data tells us that Democrats are more likely to vote early. According to a study, external by the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, 60% of Democrats cast their ballots by mail in 2020, compared to only 32% of Republicans.

An NBC News poll, external last month found that half of registered voters planned to vote early at this election, with 61% saying they would vote for Kamala Harris.

The majority of early voters at this election so far are aged 65 and over (49%), according to data from nine states. The tracker shows 34.9% of voters are in the 41-65 age bracket, and only 5.2% of early voters are aged 18-25.

Data also shows that women are currently in the lead among early voters at 54.2%. Men make up 44.3% of early voters and 1.4% are classed in this study as "unknown".

Thirty million people had voted by this point in 2020 but with two weeks still to go until election day, the number of early voters is expected to rise"

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 10/20/2024 at 11:31 AM, impulse said:

 

Maybe it's a conditioned response thing, like Pavlov ringing the bell.  I get a stiffy when I remember the way Nancy would start dancing when Donovan came on.  That hippie chick could dance.  (Her name was Nan, but I don't want anyone to think she was Thai.  Chicago girl)

 

 

 

Don't tell me! Her name was Magill, and she called herself Lil
But everyone knew her as Nancy, right?

Posted
1 minute ago, theblether said:

A bizarre poll has Kamala on +3 in New Mexico. Yes, she'll win that state but that's a diabolical poll performance. 

 

Oh, and a couple of October Surprise stories bubbling under. 

 

She's doomed, doomed, I say. 😆

If you're right, American democracy is doomed, but they will be breaking out the champagne in Moscow.

  • Like 2
Posted
8 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

I'm looking for the early voting data for Michigan, broken down by county, to see if the Democratic counties are generating lots of votes, as is happening in Pennsylvania.

 

The Michigan site is tough to negotiate, but I can see that some Blue counties, such as Oakland and Ottawa, show big turnout.

 

The Trumpers here who are predicting victory based on betting sites, seem to be ignoring  actual voting data, probably because it gives them a sad.

The betting markets make money on the totals. The odds are set so they make a profit from the totals bet not who wins

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...