Jump to content



Trump ahead in all battleground states - ALL OF THEM!


theblether

Recommended Posts

On 10/20/2024 at 11:31 AM, impulse said:

 

Maybe it's a conditioned response thing, like Pavlov ringing the bell.  I get a stiffy when I remember the way Nancy would start dancing when Donovan came on.  That hippie chick could dance.  (Her name was Nan, but I don't want anyone to think she was Thai.  Chicago girl)

 

 

 

Don't tell me! Her name was Magill, and she called herself Lil
But everyone knew her as Nancy, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theblether said:

A bizarre poll has Kamala on +3 in New Mexico. Yes, she'll win that state but that's a diabolical poll performance. 

 

Oh, and a couple of October Surprise stories bubbling under. 

 

She's doomed, doomed, I say. 😆

If you're right, American democracy is doomed, but they will be breaking out the champagne in Moscow.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

I'm looking for the early voting data for Michigan, broken down by county, to see if the Democratic counties are generating lots of votes, as is happening in Pennsylvania.

 

The Michigan site is tough to negotiate, but I can see that some Blue counties, such as Oakland and Ottawa, show big turnout.

 

The Trumpers here who are predicting victory based on betting sites, seem to be ignoring  actual voting data, probably because it gives them a sad.

The betting markets make money on the totals. The odds are set so they make a profit from the totals bet not who wins

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, proton said:

 

As well as 90 million Americans who will vote for Him, how anyone could vote for Harris is a mystery.

Maybe people don't want to vote for a candidate who wants the US military to be like "Hitler's generals".

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thesetat2013 said:

Americans Who Never Lived in Michigan and North Carolina Can Vote

New court rulings issued on Oct. 21 say U.S. citizens who live overseas and have never resided in Michigan and North Carolina can cast ballots by mail, provided they have parents who lived in those states before leaving the country.

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act mandates states to accept ballots from Americans who live outside the country, while Republicans argue this requirement does not extend to citizens who have never lived in one of the states.

In Michigan, Republicans pointed out that the state constitution says citizens who are at least 21 years of age and who have resided in Michigan for six months shall be qualified to vote, yet Judge Sima Patel responded that in a 1972 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has found a similar residency requirement unconstitutional. Even if the Republican challenge had merit, the judge said she would still deny it because it comes too close to the November election.

 

Another tactic by Democrats to get more votes. 

 

Where do you want US citizens living abroad to vote?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

If you're right, American democracy is doomed, but they will be breaking out the champagne in Moscow.

 

Why are you so intimidated by Russia ?

 

Hunters laptop wasn't enough proof for you ....

 

#partyBoi

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

Americans Who Never Lived in Michigan and North Carolina Can Vote

New court rulings issued on Oct. 21 say U.S. citizens who live overseas and have never resided in Michigan and North Carolina can cast ballots by mail, provided they have parents who lived in those states before leaving the country.

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act mandates states to accept ballots from Americans who live outside the country, while Republicans argue this requirement does not extend to citizens who have never lived in one of the states.

In Michigan, Republicans pointed out that the state constitution says citizens who are at least 21 years of age and who have resided in Michigan for six months shall be qualified to vote, yet Judge Sima Patel responded that in a 1972 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has found a similar residency requirement unconstitutional. Even if the Republican challenge had merit, the judge said she would still deny it because it comes too close to the November election.

 

Another tactic by Democrats to get more votes. 

 

Good and correct ruling by Judge Patel, who was following established law.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now