Jump to content

Russell Brand Faces Potential Charges as Police Submit File to Prosecutors


Social Media

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, oxo1947 said:

 

I am not Victim shaming but should you wait nearly 20 years before complaining...... Or in the latest cases wait till the guy dies. 

 

This last few weeks Alex Salmon --The Harrods guy etc , all complaints after they have nailed the coffin lid down. 

Building a case can take time, a lot of time, taking someone to court has got to be near perfect of a conviction..😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, transam said:

Taking out a case individually can cost a lot of money, but, if one finds others have had the same experience, then they can come forward to provide info to the police.

They all also know, that if they tell porkies, they themselves can/will be prosecuted

 

Well they have--- 400 women and still more every day....

 

Obviously he wasn't a nice guy ---but I think the Alex Salmon is a classic, 26 hours after he died 3 weeks ago  ,  2 women came forward to say he sexually assaulted me about 7 years ago. He had been to court been found innocent of a claim of sexual assault--  but of course this one will be a little bit harder for him to defend......:w00t:

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I am sure all those women thought he is such a model for a monogamous partner who will marry them, and they will live happily ever after, and he will never ever look at another woman again. Or maybe not? What did they expect from that guy? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What do you think is a reasonable time to pass after which a rapist should be free of any chance of prosecution for their crimes?

 

 

Surely, you mean alleged rapist? if you didn't the rapist would already be in prison, because he or she must have already been found guilty in a criminal court?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Surely, you mean alleged rapist? if you didn't the rapist would already be in prison, because he or she must have already been found guilty in a criminal court?

 

 

Not in Starmer's Britain, where even the home office calls them criminals before a trial.

 

image.png.b9c4428ce12233305be8e95b74dc72f0.png

  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

It is a matter of proven fact that many so called "conspiracy theories" later turn out to be true. Of course, labelling inconvenient truths a "conspiracy theory" is a tactic commonly used by gaslighting leftists, especially when someone calls out their political lawfare. 

 

https://history.howstuffworks.com/history-vs-myth/11-unbelievable-conspiracy-theories-that-were-actually-true.htm

 


Eh?? Because a handful of "conspiracy theories" ended up being true that means you can dream up any old nonsense and it's ok?

What about the millions of conspiracy theories that ended up just being conspiracy theories?

  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

 

I think all the women who desired that guy got exactly what they deserved.

Some of those women could have had a nice guy, who loves them. But that is obviously not what they wanted.

 

image-w856.jpg

 

So all woman who are flattered by the attention of a Lothario are 'asking for it', have only themselves to blame and can't have been raped?

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What do you think is a reasonable time to pass after which a rapist should be free of any chance of prosecution for their crimes?

 

 

No statute of limitations in the UK.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

Quite so, its a real shame the police didn't spend as much time and effort on investigating the Pakistani grooming gangs!

I know a few were convicted but just the tip of the iceberg!

Well at least they did convict. In the case of establishment favourites 'sir' Jimmy Savile and 'sir' Cyril Smith they were allowed to get away with it for decades. One a LibDem MP and the other being Thatcher's poster boy, and I don't recall either being Pakistani.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...