Jump to content

Housing Benefit Freeze Leaves Low-Income Renters Struggling as Rent Soars, Experts Warn


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Rental prices are decided by market rates , its what tenants are willing to pay .

   If a landlord puts his property on the market for more than market rates, then he wont get any tenants 

 

His comment sounds like the precursor to some kind of government interference in private rental prices. 

 

Labour would love that. More state control. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Have Labour announced that they will be building these new homes ?

 

Probably.

 

It's easy to promise though. Look at Sadiq Khan and how he is getting on.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/sadiq-khan-affordable-homes-housing-statistics-london-b2596188.html

 

image.png.6e9c41cf759e5e67e1c03e8ea1e60dc6.png

 

The way Labour has broken most of their election promises since gaining power, who really cares what they promise at this point?

  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, john donson said:

I wonder how thai people cope, with no handout

 

the moo baan I lived for 15 years, saw rent increases from 25.000 baht just after covid, to 40.000 baht now, for exactly the same old houses

And the moobaan I live in (all 3 bed detached), the rents have dropped from 10kbht/month in 2014 to 9kbht/month today.

 

And the shack rooms available everywhere are still priced at 1k5bht/month.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Social Media said:

The LHA freeze was in the [budget] small print,” he said, adding, “But that is going to affect 4.6 million people who receive LHA.

 

   That costs the UK about 5 Billion GBP per month of taxpayers money 

Posted
15 minutes ago, ElwoodP said:

They used to have rent control on many UK properties in the 1970s.

Indeed and rent controls remain commonplace across Europe and that bastion of the free market, the U.S.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

And the moobaan I live in (all 3 bed detached), the rents have dropped from 10kbht/month in 2014 to 9kbht/month today.

 

And the shack rooms available everywhere are still priced at 1k5bht/month.

 

   Its a problem for landlords in the U.K as well .

When disagreeable unpleasant tenants move into a house , other potential tenants refrain from moving into the area and landlords have to reduce the rent for their properties  , which attracts other disagreeable tenants , before you know it, you have fridges and sofas in the front garden and the Police visiting on a weekly basis 

  • Agree 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

His comment sounds like the precursor to some kind of government interference in private rental prices. 

 

Labour would love that. More state control. 

I absolutely would support rent controls.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I absolutely would support rent controls.

 

Of course you would.

 

The trouble is, as house prices and the cost of maintenance increase, so do landlords costs. So there comes a point at which rents also need to increase or it is not viable. 

 

But then I presume you'd also support the government buying these houses and controlling it all themselves, like a communist state?  

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Do you have a link to the applicable human rights laws?

lol if you want to know so much why don't you use Google? The human rights lawyer taking it to court has more knowledge than me 

 

European convention on human rights and the Human Rights Act 1998

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  Did they just say that they are going to build new homes or have they actually put those words into motion ?

   How far have they got in building these new homes ?

Where will they be built ?

You’ve never built a house have you?

 

Here’s a tip if you decide to do, it takes time, a lot longer than 4 months.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Its a problem for landlords in the U.K as well .

When disagreeable unpleasant tenants move into a house , other potential tenants refrain from moving into the area and landlords have to reduce the rent for their properties  , which attracts other disagreeable tenants , before you know it, you have fridges and sofas in the front garden and the Police visiting on a weekly basis 

 

Unfortunately that also applies when you don't drop the rent.

 

I recently had to evict a tenant who was causing the police to turn up a few times a month for beating up his Ukranian girlfriend. 

 

Another tenant had a St Bernard jump out of the second storey bedroom window (through the closed glass window) and land in the front garden. 

 

Very difficult to find decent tenants in the UK now. They are so protected by the law that they feel they can do what they want, trash your property, be antisocial etc. and the courts generally side with them. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

lol if you want to know so much why don't you use Google? The human rights lawyer taking it to court has more knowledge than me 

 

European convention on human rights and the Human Rights Act 1998


It wasn’t me who claimed the existence of a human right to buy privilege:

 

“If the government is not providing adequate education then buying privilege's is a human right.”

 

 

  • Sad 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You’ve never built a house have you?

 

Here’s a tip if you decide to do, it takes time, a lot longer than 4 months.

 

You also need to start building it. Instead of promising to do it to win an election and then changing your mind.  

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You’ve never built a house have you?

 

Here’s a tip if you decide to do, it takes time, a lot longer than 4 months.

 

  I am a builder, I spent my life building houses .

How far along have Labour got in building those new houses ?

Bought the land ?

Got the plans drawn up ?

Or are they just still thinking about doing it ?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
Just now, JonnyF said:

 

You also need to start building it. Instead of promising to do it to win an election and then changing your mind.  


A bit of a challenge to enact policies before winning an election toon, don’t you agree?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


It wasn’t me who claimed the existence of a human right to buy privilege:

 

 

“If the government is not providing adequate education then buying privilege's is a human right.”

 

Read my post again and stop taking it out of context it clearly contains the reference to it from the lawyer. :saai: I see you've already started your habitual dishonest debating again.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
Just now, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  I am a builder, I spent my life building houses .

How far along have Labour got in building those new houses ?

Bought the land ?

Got the plans drawn up ?

Or are they just still thinking about doing it ?

I’ve no idea, and less idea why you are asking me.

 

But taking you at your word, this life building houses surely taught you houses don’t get built in 4 months.

 

You’ve listed only some of the steps, non of which Labour could undertake until in Government.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:


A bit of a challenge to enact policies before winning an election toon, don’t you agree?

 

Certainly more challenging than lieing about not needing to raise taxes then raising them by 40 Billion. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Truncating posts to remove context Jonny.

 

 

 

The second part of that sentence did not add context.

 

But here you are if it helps with your pedantry.

 

image.png.499f6ce7e1c433c70efa54b3ecb8d68f.png

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’ve no idea, and less idea why you are asking me.

 

But taking you at your word, this life building houses surely taught you houses don’t get built in 4 months.

 

You’ve listed only some of the steps, non of which Labour could undertake until in Government.

 

  Yes, they could have .

In Four months they could have bought the land to build the houses and get the plans drawn up and maybe even began building the houses .

   How far along are they in building the houses ?

I expect that they've done nothing at all and the houses won't get built 

  • Agree 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said:

I expect that they've done nothing at all and the houses won't get built 

 

More likely they'll promise to start in 5 years time, right after they are comprehensively removed from power by a furious electorate.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  Yes, they could have .

In Four months they could have bought the land to build the houses and get the plans drawn up and maybe even began building the houses .

   How far along are they in building the houses ?

I expect that they've done nothing at all and the houses won't get built 

So no arguments then from you about the previous 14 years of failure to deal with the housing shortage.

 

But you want it fixed in 4 months.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      Saudia Airlines - Choose Carefully

    2. 107

      Japan dethrones Thailand as top tourist spot

    3. 0

      Is It Better to Date a “6” Than a “10” in Thailand?

    4. 67

      Poster of the Year 2024

    5. 107

      Britain’s Sharia Courts and the Challenge of Religious Freedom

    6. 107

      Japan dethrones Thailand as top tourist spot

    7. 67

      Poster of the Year 2024

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...