Misogynistic Attacks Against Women Surge on Social Media Following Trump’s Election Win

[Hawaiian]

25 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

That should be a concern for them.

And just how long will the effects of Biden's open borders policy last?

[mokwit]

44 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Occam's Razor says the simplest explanation is also the most probable.

 

On that basis, IMO lack of education is most likely.

I was alluding to the debasement of education by asking if it was age dependent. Non native speaker was the only other possibility I could think of.

[Lacessit]

44 minutes ago, mokwit said:

I was alluding to the debasement of education by asking if it was age dependent. Non native speaker was the only other possibility I could think of.

IIRC Trump said he was going to abolish the Department of Education. Which may actually be a good idea, if the bureaucracy is too much for the teachers at the coal face.

Russian education collapsed in the mid-eighties. Russia now has a severe shortfall of scientists and engineers, as the ones they have are retiring.

[Nick Carter icp]

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

IIRC Trump said he was going to abolish the Department of Education. Which may actually be a good idea, if the bureaucracy is too much for the teachers at the coal face.

Russian education collapsed in the mid-eighties. Russia now has a severe shortfall of scientists and engineers, as the ones they have are retiring.

 

   Trump wouldn't have the power/ability to abolish the DoE , he would need the support from  Congress and a super majority 

[Lacessit]

4 hours ago, frank83628 said:

so because your opinion differs, all those that voted for Trump are stupid?

it actually just makes you sound like a condescending ass THB.

you know that was Hillarys problem, the 'deplorables' comment cost her big time.

I see you are true to your usual form, attacking the poster rather than the message.

 

It just shows your lack of anything of substance in rebuttal, consistent with your low level of education.

 

Yes, people who are swayed by a fake populist who really only cares about himself are stupid.

[frank83628]

2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

I see you are true to your usual form, attacking the poster rather than the message.

 

It just shows your lack of anything of sustance in rebuttal, consistent with your low level of education.

 

Yes, people who are swayed by a fake populist who really only cares about himself are stupid.

ah, out comes the victim nonsense, you were attacking every posted on her that doesn't agree with you.  you proved my point, pompous old coffin dodger. 

[Lacessit]

53 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

ah, out comes the victim nonsense, you were attacking every posted on her that doesn't agree with you.  you proved my point, pompous old coffin dodger. 

Better than someone who doesn't seem to have a life outside these threads. An uneducated boor.

[frank83628]

20 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Better than someone who doesn't seem to have a life outside these threads. An uneducated boor.

I got 40 yrs + left of my uneducated life, you can't say the same

[Airalee]

29 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Better than someone who doesn't seem to have a life outside these threads. An uneducated boor.

Hilarious.  
 

The guy with 27,000 posts in 8 years says this to another guy with 4,000 posts in 10 years.

[jimmybcool]

I'd still love to hear who will determine what is hate speech.  I mean I don't think anyone here wants to stifle free speech.  It is a cornerstone to freedom.  And I hope we all recognize that no one has a right to go through life without feeling offended.  So, where is the line, who defines it.  That last is critical.  Do those on the left want those on the right to define hate speech? 

 

I'm also curious has anyone provided any hard data that misogyny is on the rise?  I confess I might have skimmed this thread and missed it. 

 

And I find it hysterical the spin some use to try and pretend there are actually more than 2 real genders.  Funny considering every society on the planet that has a birth certificate has only two options for new born babies.  Even Thailand the country of lady-boys considers them men if they have a penis at birth and regardless of surgeries they remain male on their passport for life.  Would love to see the list of alternative options formalized by medical science or some legitimate national definition.  I have an open mind but have never heard a legitimate explanation of how there are so many "new genders" in the last 3 years.

[pattayasan]

21 minutes ago, jimmybcool said:

I'd still love to hear who will determine what is hate speech.  I mean I don't think anyone here wants to stifle free speech.  It is a cornerstone to freedom.  And I hope we all recognize that no one has a right to go through life without feeling offended.  So, where is the line, who defines it.  That last is critical.  Do those on the left want those on the right to define hate speech? 

 

I'm also curious has anyone provided any hard data that misogyny is on the rise?  I confess I might have skimmed this thread and missed it. 

 

And I find it hysterical the spin some use to try and pretend there are actually more than 2 real genders.  Funny considering every society on the planet that has a birth certificate has only two options for new born babies.  Even Thailand the country of lady-boys considers them men if they have a penis at birth and regardless of surgeries they remain male on their passport for life.  Would love to see the list of alternative options formalized by medical science or some legitimate national definition.  I have an open mind but have never heard a legitimate explanation of how there are so many "new genders" in the last 3 years.

 

In countries with laws against hate speech, ant person who feels aggrieved can file a complaint. LIke any other criminal complaint a prosecutor decides whether to prosecute the complaint. In the US, there are no laws against hate speech that I know of so it's a free for all. To answer your question, in other countries it would go to a jury trial and the jury of peers decides.

[jimmybcool]

1 hour ago, pattayasan said:

 

In countries with laws against hate speech, ant person who feels aggrieved can file a complaint. LIke any other criminal complaint a prosecutor decides whether to prosecute the complaint. In the US, there are no laws against hate speech that I know of so it's a free for all. To answer your question, in other countries it would go to a jury trial and the jury of peers decides.

 

OK.  Which countries have such laws?  Are there any that aren't tyrannies or religiously dominated?

 

But to put this in perspective when someone calls me a bigot for claiming there are only two genders am I then allowed to file a complaint?  I mean I would feel offended and I would consider that a hateful thing to call me.  And if a jury agrees with me the person calling me that gets punished?  Can't figure out how it ends?  Guessing it ends when the majority is able to silence the minority.  Doesn't sound like free speech to me.