Jump to content

A Police Visit on Remembrance Sunday Reveals the Reality of Our Two-Tier Justice System


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Oddly the person who is said to be the subject of this police visit is not named, so there no way of checking the veracity of the claims. 

Telegraph journalist Allison Pearson.  Allegedly a comment about Hamas/Israel/demonstrations.

Edited by Liverpool Lou
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Telegraph journalist Allison Pearson.

She was writing about herself?  Hopefully the Daily Telegraph fire her, if she's found guilty.

  • Confused 2
Posted
48 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

This is exactly the sort of non sense we Americans are trying to evict. Perhaps electing Trump will give other nations the courage to fight back on this kind of stupidity. You're welcome.

You speak the imperial truth, however I think it is too late for the UK! It's very sad!

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

What on earth are you talking about ?

 

How can she be found guilty when she hasn’t been charged with any offence, and the police themselves are calling it a non crime.

 

It might help if you read the article before making puerile comments.

 

 

From the article 

"Recently, Essex Police released a statement saying my post is now being investigated as a criminal matter under Section 17 of the Public Order Act 1986. "

Posted
1 hour ago, billd766 said:

No they didn't.

 

The politicians that make the laws might have done, but the UK people don't make the law, politicians do.

 

As for the OP

 

Why blame the police in the first place? 

 

They are only doing their job as laid down.

Where have I heard that before, 'i was only doing my job, oh yes the Germans in WW2

  • Sad 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Oh dear. I fear my home country, the UK, is heading for deep trouble...

It is looking like Orwell's 1984 is here in 2024.  Wait until 2025 and the UK totalitarian government may make the transition complete.
"Newspeak" "'non-crime hate incident' (NCHI)"  and "Thoughtcrime" are now realities.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Oddly the person who is said to be the subject of this police visit is not named, so there no way of checking the veracity of the claims. 
 

The Telegraph really is becoming a comic.

 

 

 

What are you gibbering about ?
 

The Journalist name is Allison Pearson, she wrote the original article

 

Here is the latest follow up article

 

Quote

A police force has been accused of an “appalling” attack on free speech after launching an investigation into a Telegraph journalist.

Essex Police is facing a backlash from critics, including Boris Johnson, over its investigation into Allison Pearson for allegedly stirring up racial hatred in a social media post last year.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

What on earth are you talking about ?

 

How can she be found guilty when she hasn’t been charged with any offence, and the police themselves are calling it a non crime.

 

It might help if you read the article before making puerile comments.

 

 

She should still be fired.  No smoke without fire.

  • Sad 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

In the UK, if you come home to find your 12 year old son being raped by a masked migrant and when he attacks you, you beat him to death, you go to prison for a hate crime.

 

You guys need a revolution

The worst part is that alot of british posters here still dont get it and tell Americans we should be more like them!

Posted
1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

In the UK, if you come home to find your 12 year old son being raped by a masked migrant and when he attacks you, you beat him to death, you go to prison for a hate crime.

 

You guys need a revolution

 

Not quite

 

If you beat him to death in your home, you will be charged, tried and probably acquitted.

 

If you chase him 500. metres up the street, then beat him to death. You will be charged, tried and probably convicted of manslaughter.

 

I agree, the UK does need a revolution, or at least drastic action taken before it is too late ( Although, it may well be too late )

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

Off topic, this is about an incident in the UK; don't try and hijack the thread 

 

 

post police

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The Telegraph is turning into Viz.

How so, perhaps you can explain? She seems to be recounting an experience with the Police.

  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

Says someone that gets all their UK news from either the Guardian or the farcically named Independent. 

So true. There is nothing you can do to make Lefties understand that they haven't found the truth, they have just found the other sides propaganda. We have one member, a very simple type, who thinks it is all the truth because he read it in an award winning newspaper.

  • Love It 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

In the UK, if you come home to find your 12 year old son being raped by a masked migrant and when he attacks you, you beat him to death, you go to prison for a hate crime.

 

You guys need a revolution

Nonsense.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Oddly the person who is said to be the subject of this police visit is not named, so there no way of checking the veracity of the claims. 
 

The Telegraph really is becoming a comic.

 

 

I think it is pretty obvious it is Alison Pearson. The note at the bottom of the article  says based on a report - which likely means altered beyond copyright applying.

 

The original article says who.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/12/telegraph-journalist-allison-pearson-hate-crime-alleged/

Posted
3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Oddly the person who is said to be the subject of this police visit is not named, so there no way of checking the veracity of the claims. 
 

The Telegraph really is becoming a comic.

 

 

It is not the Telegraph, it is a synopsis generated by AI that has to be vague to avoid copyright infringement.

 

here is the Telegraph: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/12/telegraph-journalist-allison-pearson-hate-crime-alleged/

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

You are talking absolute garbage again. I have already asked you what it is she said or wrote, but you haven’t got a clue have you.

 

How can you want her re-educated when you haven’t any idea what she said, and how it was offensive; stop making an utter fool of yourself.

 

 

Likewise, how can anyone complain about the police visiting her without knowledge of the actual facts relating to her alleged online posts.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

Repetitive criticisms of the Asean News Item have been removed @Chomper Higgot

 

17. ASEAN NOW news team collects news articles from various recognised and reputable news sources. The articles  may be consolidated from different sources and rewritten with AI assistance These news items are shared in our forums for members to stay informed and engaged. Our dedicated news team puts in the effort to deliver quality content, and we ask for your respect in return. Any disrespectful comments about our news articles or the content itself, such as calling it "clickbait" or “slow news day”, and criticising grammatical errors, will not be tolerated and appropriate action will be taken. Please note that republished articles may contain errors or opinions that do not reflect the views of ASEAN NOW.

If you'd like to help us, and you see an error with an article, then please use the report function so that we can attend to it promptly.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, soalbundy said:

Who decides what is hate speech and what is an opinion? Apart from that for hate speech to have any affect it must have a general consensus within the public, a consensus that is ignored by the authorities.

The law defines the difference, the courts decides if the law has been broken.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The law defines the difference, the courts decides if the law has been broken.

Unfortunately it seems the laws are vague, probably by design.

Posted
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

In the UK, if you come home to find your 12 year old son being raped by a masked migrant and when he attacks you, you beat him to death, you go to prison for a hate crime.

 

You guys need a revolution

That’s a sordid imagination you have there.

 

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The law defines the difference, the courts decides if the law has been broken.

"the law'' is not an entity, somebody has determined what the law is, after all somebody once determined the laws on the rightfulness of slavery, on blasphemy, on the death penalty, "the law is an ass" comes to mind.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, soalbundy said:

"the law'' is not an entity, somebody has determined what the law is, after all somebody once determined the laws on the rightfulness of slavery, on blasphemy, on the death penalty, "the law is an ass" comes to mind.

Nevertheless, I did answer the question you asked.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...