Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, riclag said:

Never in the history of my country has

the Opposition party administration used lawfare to persecute a former POTUS.

 

 

Bye Jack

 

https://nypost.com/2024/11/13/us-news/special-counsel-jack-smith-stands-down-in-trump-classified-docs-case-asks-court-to-halt-appeal/

 

 

 

As an outsider looking in, it was obvious to me that Lawfare was being used against Trump to stop him standing again.

 

It appears that it failed miserably.

 

Much the same as the Lawfare that was used against the last UK Government. I look on with mild amusement as that same Lawfare is now being used against the current UK Shambles.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

As an outsider looking in, it was obvious to me that Lawfare was being used against Trump to stop him standing again.

 

It appears that it failed miserably.

 

Much the same as the Lawfare that was used against the last UK Government. I look on with mild amusement as that same Lawfare is now being used against the current UK Shambles.

It made me sick to my stomach to see

Trump cow down to Biden , by shaking 

his hand in the Oval Office!Even though it was a sign of good faith!

 

Years ago,  Biden told a reporter we are gonna make sure Trump doesn’t get into power again by using the Constitution to stop him! That was in November of 2022. What the factcheckers neglect to mention is in December of 2022 , one month after

Bidens comment Matthew Colangelo #3 in the DOJ resigned and went to work for Bragg the other DEM prosecutor in NYC.

 

“Following the 2022 midterm elections, President Joe Biden spent about an hour speaking to and answering questions from reporters at the White House.

Now, a 16-second clip from that Nov. 9 press conference is being used to support former President Donald Trump’s claim that the criminal charges brought against him in New York amount to “election interference” orchestrated by top Democrats.


 

It failed , the purveyors of the Constitution , The SCOTUS rejected 

this by a decision of Presidential Immunity . Biden didn’t agree with that decision.

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/04/bidens-2022-remarks-not-related-to-trump-indictment-contrary-to-online-posts/

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-indictment-biden-666348749991

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...