bradiston Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 3 hours ago, BritManToo said: My Brit wife got 19 years of NI payments for having a child (you only got it for 1 kid). So it would only be infertile non-working married women that had no state pension. I think that is a highly dubious statement. Not having kids doesn't mean infertility. Non working married women do get a pension on the death of their husband, or so I believe. While he's alive, they will get the extra marriage allowance.
BritManToo Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 8 minutes ago, bradiston said: I think that is a highly dubious statement. Not having kids doesn't mean infertility. Non working married women do get a pension on the death of their husband, or so I believe. While he's alive, they will get the extra marriage allowance. Marriage allowance went 10 years back.
bradiston Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, BritManToo said: Marriage allowance went 10 years back. So a married couple don't get any extra?
transam Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 13 minutes ago, bradiston said: So a married couple don't get any extra? Folk are now treated as individuals, marriage allowance ended in 2010 for foreign wives, those who were getting a marriage allowance payments were stopped in 2020, they lost the payment...
kwilco Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago On 11/16/2024 at 12:18 PM, Gottfrid said: As the topic regards pension and financial situations, I was referring to that with my comment. As I deal with decentralized finance, you might understand that better. So, the only one that is ill-informed here, seems to be you. ...and you don't even realise it...but then the one follows the other.
Dogmatix Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago The proper way to resolve this is not to harass pensioners who are being defrauded of their pension increments by the British government. despite having made NIC contributions their entire working lives, but to pay the increments to everyone regardless of residence. There is no justification for paying increments to someone in the Philippines but not to someone in Thailand or paying someone in the US but not someone in Canada. My brother lives in the US and gets the full UK triple lock, having continued to pay in voluntarily after leaving the UK, and US social security and medicare.
transam Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Dogmatix said: The proper way to resolve this is not to harass pensioners who are being defrauded of their pension increments by the British government. despite having made NIC contributions their entire working lives, but to pay the increments to everyone regardless of residence. There is no justification for paying increments to someone in the Philippines but not to someone in Thailand or paying someone in the US but not someone in Canada. My brother lives in the US and gets the full UK triple lock, having continued to pay in voluntarily after leaving the UK, and US social security and medicare. We know all that, but no Party is interested in changing the ruling.....🤔
jori123 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, bradiston said: It's only frozen when you're found, or you've declared, to have moved abroad to live in a non-reciprocating country. Exactly what percentage of pensioners this represents I have no idea, and in any case, would not be very reliable for obvious reasons. Never have a true estimate, but Id hazard a guess its the majority of ex pats are not frozen. Of course could ask DWP as to any sanctions are visited on any "found" miscreants,...never answered, simply because nobody "found "out, or investigated As to "declared, "up to individual, but its sure a sucker punch when you have self denied yourself for years increases in pension. Means tested benefits are obv investigated for that £15000 in recipients bank, PP stamps for returning OA pensioners is a myth, as to being "caught" 1
Gottfrid Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, kwilco said: ...and you don't even realise it...but then the one follows the other. That´s not really true. It reacts on many of the same factors, but no one follows the other.
jori123 Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago 29 minutes ago, Dogmatix said: The proper way to resolve this is not to harass pensioners who are being defrauded of their pension increments by the British government. despite having made NIC contributions their entire working lives, but to pay the increments to everyone regardless of residence. There is no justification for paying increments to someone in the Philippines but not to someone in Thailand or paying someone in the US but not someone in Canada. My brother lives in the US and gets the full UK triple lock, having continued to pay in voluntarily after leaving the UK, and US social security and medicare. There is no fraud, there is no punishment, its only guidance and policy, not written in law, DWP regulations true, but that goes on to explain there are no punishments /sanctions. Admit few sucker punches handed out 1
transam Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago 1 minute ago, jori123 said: There is no fraud, there is no punishment, its only guidance and policy, not written in law, DWP regulations true, but that goes on to explain there are no punishments /sanctions. Admit few sucker punches handed out I am sure we are all happy you are now managing OK on your full pension.......... 1
jori123 Posted 51 minutes ago Posted 51 minutes ago 1 minute ago, transam said: I am sure we are all happy you are now managing OK on your full pension.......... LOL I know your not 1
transam Posted 50 minutes ago Posted 50 minutes ago Just now, jori123 said: LOL I know your not How would you know.......?.....🤭 1
jori123 Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago (edited) 37 minutes ago, transam said: How would you know.......?.....🤭 Is this you ? its on record Transam stated ....... " I know of three people that were found out living in LOS claiming their pension as living in the UK. None went to court...Why, because the UK gov had proof which would be daft to contested in a court of law..If they lost the case it's big money.." Transam stated " Two paid 1000 quid gov fine and had to pay back all the over payments. The third (my friend) did not have to pay a fine because he proved he had brain damage and his UK sister handled all his paperwork and she did not know of the Reciprocal Agreement thing regarding LOS, he still had to pay back I think 8 years over payment... " Is this truthful ? I know not. You later admitted it was not State Pension,"something else" you state. No £1000 fine either. DWP regulations state Non Sanctionable for state pensioners, but obv uou (only you ) know difference No 8 years,6 years max. It was sickness benefit, sprinkling of Pension Credit, solid hogwash,attempting to make out it was state Pension Jealousy/spite/envy on the hoof Edited 11 minutes ago by jori123
James9999 Posted 5 minutes ago Posted 5 minutes ago 28 minutes ago, jori123 said: Is this you ? its on record Transam stated ....... " I know of three people that were found out living in LOS claiming their pension as living in the UK. None went to court...Why, because the UK gov had proof which would be daft to contested in a court of law..If they lost the case it's big money.." J Would be interesting to know what "proof" they had the these people were living in Thailand.
jori123 Posted just now Posted just now 2 minutes ago, James9999 said: Would be interesting to know what "proof" they had the these people were living in Thailand. If you hang about for a while I'm sure he will be along to explain, but then ,he will attempt to have it taken down
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now