Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, UWEB said:

So the fascist States of America are your dream but living in a communist Country? May be time to check your mental Health.


Seek assistance.  Immediately!

Posted
3 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

They want quality tourists, not homophobic narrow-minded people.


And now you’re a sitting member of the Thai Tourism Board in good standing?

Posted

For generations Thailand has been known internationally as an easy-going country regarding sexual preferences. I doubt the new legislation will make much difference to the numbers of tourists arriving here. What has changed, however, is the profile of foreign visitors who now appear to be mainly from China and India, with less coming from Europe and the USA. It is unclear to me why the Thai government has encouraged this trend.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Link to your claim?


Love it!  Another confirmation your brain contents are your display name 

Posted
7 minutes ago, G_Money said:


As the resident expert please refer to the homophobia (in your mind).

 

Classic leftist homosexuals.  When someone disagrees with your opinion Raise The Homophobia Card.  
 

The catch all for everything.

You're clearly no Einstein, but you playacting as a DUMBO as not seeing the homophobia on this topic isn't fooling anyone. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Lacessit said:

I am solid hetero, live and live is my motto. There are about 1500 species apart from man that can exhibit same-sex behaviors in a proportion of their population.

 

The most fervent white racists frequently have black ancestors. I suspect it is the same story with homophobes.


“There are about 1500 species apart from man that can exhibit same-sex behaviors in a proportion of their population.”

 

Only you would know and post that.

 

Another “expert “. award granted.

Posted
2 minutes ago, G_Money said:


“There are about 1500 species apart from man that can exhibit same-sex behaviors in a proportion of their population.”

 

Only you would know and post that.

 

Another “expert “. award granted.

OMG, knowing things is scary!

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, cjinchiangrai said:

What a racist, snobbish comment. There are plenty of Chinese and Indians with more money than you, and a better attitude. 


Which part was racist?  Your word for every time you disagree with someone.

Posted
1 hour ago, FritsSikkink said:

Define quality tourist. Quite a few very rich Indian and Chinese visitors.

Hope you don't mean Western sexpats.

 
But gay western sexpats are acceptable?

Posted

I don't think it was rejected in the USA, just limit the grooming of the children, and let the parents decide what, when & how sex education is offered to their kids ... BY THE PARENTS.

 

Some protection of children from making the wrong, life altering decision, before mature enough to understand the full ramifications of.

 

Along with wrong use of pronouns, confusing as hell, and catering to special interest groups.

 

As far as tourism, can't see it hurting that, as they come here now, all nationalities because some won't or can't in home country.   Playing away from prying eyes, family, friends & officials. Seems more than a few come to TH to test out giving head, without the fear of losing theirs :coffee1:

  • Haha 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

For generations Thailand has been known internationally as an easy-going country regarding sexual preferences. I doubt the new legislation will make much difference to the numbers of tourists arriving here. What has changed, however, is the profile of foreign visitors who now appear to be mainly from China and India, with less coming from Europe and the USA. It is unclear to me why the Thai government has encouraged this trend.

I wonder who finds this funny.

Posted
47 minutes ago, G_Money said:


Love it!  Another confirmation your brain contents are your display name 

No link just your usual childish behaviour.

  • Agree 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Maybe they are a sovereign nation and have decided to expand the civil rights of their own citizens not caring that other nations are more backwards. I seriously doubt there is even one foreign tourist that wouldn't travel to Thailand because LGBTQ civil rights have been expanded here. On the other hand, backwards countries like Iran, Sudan, Jamaica, etc. lose many potentional tourists because of their oppressive laws.

As always your perspective is spot on, thank you for the clear and concise analysis. 

 

I completely agree about oppressive nations, why on earth would anyone want to visit? 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Yagoda said:

I guess with its reputation for sex and sleaze, one would expect this, but my question is, will the promotion of the Homosexual agenda HURT Thai tourism, in light of the recent rejection of that agenda in America.

 

https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/general/2902066/thailand-set-to-reap-2-billion-rainbow-tourism-boon-with-same-sex-marriage-law

 

I wonder how the Arab tourists view it, considering that such conduct is punishable by death in those nations.

 

And what pray tell is  "LGBTQQIP2SAA"? New perversions added daily?
 

I have gay friends in the US who have been married for quite awhile.  Gay marriage in the US has been legal since 2015.  Thailand is actually well behind the curve.  Personally I don't care who marries who as long as they are humans.  Whatever trips your trigger. 

Edited by connda
  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

 

 

I completely agree about oppressive nations, why on earth would anyone want to visit? 

 

Because they don't like seeing men doing unnatural things purely because they were abused as children.

Why not just keep that degen <deleted> behind closed doors?

 

Sodomy is an act of violence (NOT love) imho.

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
28 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

 

Thailand has always been tolerant of gay men and lesbians, and that's a wonderful thing. 

 

Agreed. No need to platform freaks or give degens special protected status.

 

That sort of behaviour should be mocked mercilessly so

there's less chance of it being 'passed on/onto/into/all over young innocent children

 

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

Shouldn't be allowed around kids imho - that's the main problem with normalising putting yr pee pees in poo chutes.

 

It's disgusting - you can pretend its not but facts are facts.

 

Normalisting and letting these obvious  perverts adopt kids is a bridge too far imho.

Theres's queers in the Muzzie countries too but they are discreet - that's better for socierty as a whole - imho

but obvs the chancers here are looking for more of  that non stop squirt and jerk $ 

 

My brother is gay and married with a man for decades. He is great with my kids.

Would want anyone like you near my kids even if they gave me millions.

Disgusting post.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

A troll post breaking community standards has been removed.

 

@BruceWayne note forum rule 15. You will not discriminate or post slurs, degrading or overly negative comments on the basis of race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, nationality, disability, medical history, marriage, civil partnership, pregnancy, maternity, paternity, gender identity, sexual orientation or any other irrelevant factor.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

My brother is gay and married with a man for decades. He is great with my kids.

Would want anyone like you near my kids even if they gave me millions.

Disgusting post.

I had a gay neighbor couple like that when I lived in the USA. They were awful.

 

They kept coming onto my property. They had to walk around the block and come in from the front side and pulling up the plants along the fence on my side.

 

I was a single guy at the time and I'm sure it had something to do with them being gay.

 

It was because I was not real social with them so they did not want me there. Pulling up the plants symbolized that. My reluctance was misinterpreted as disapproval of their homosexuality.

Edited by JimTripper
  • Sad 3
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Yagoda said:

the Homosexual agenda

 

It doesn't exist.

Don't listen to the legacy liars and just look around you IRL.

Nothing.

No gay agenda, no feminist agenda, nothing.

Go on Bangla, soi cowboy, walking street, etc...

NO-THING. NADA.

The woke agenda sweeping the world has always been a leftist lie to try and make it real.

And as you said in your OP: it didn't work.

Nobody gives a turd because most people don't really care wether you like it up the @ss or not as long as you don't behave like a freak in public.

Based.

So true.

Edited by ModdaPunk
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Well not everyone won lifes lottery, like us US citizens. I won twice, I got to live in Cambodia and Thailand  in addition to being a citizen of the greatest country on Earth.

That is about to collapse on the interest paid on its 35 trillion debt, many countries are now fed up paying the US for a life style it can't afford.

Posted

The Homosexual Movement (whatever that is) has been around for thousands of years. I could not care less what people do in their bedrooms, but I dislike all this minority fanfare and divisiveness. Do what Thou Wilt but Harm None.

Posted

     It's a huge market, and always has been.  Lots of wealthy gays with no kids to tie them down and plenty of time for travel.  Thailand should definitely benefit by being seen as now being even more gay friendly with marriage rights.  With covid shutting international travel down for a couple of years, many, not just gays, are ready to make up those lost travel years.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...