Thailand goes all in on The Homosexual Movement

[HK MacPhooey]

On 11/15/2024 at 9:54 AM, JonnyF said:

It's been popular with homosexuals for years.

 

I often see elderly Americans walking around Silom with their little Thai twink it tow. I don't really see it as much of a benefit to tourism though, compared to all the Muslims/Arabs that object to such open displays of homosexuality. 

Muslims/Arabs don't seem to object to open displays of sex toys, drug paraphernalia etc on lower Sukhumvit as they walk passed with their extended families in tow - why should elderly Americans of any sexual persuasion care what these people think of them?

[Jingthing]

16 minutes ago, HK MacPhooey said:

Muslims/Arabs don't seem to object to open displays of sex toys, drug paraphernalia etc on lower Sukhumvit as they walk passed with their extended families in tow - why should elderly Americans of any sexual persuasion care what these people think of them?

Because they're bending over backwards to rationalize their ignorance and bigotry.

[G_Money]

8 hours ago, newnative said:

     76.6 million and counting.  And Harris currently at 74 million and counting.  Trump was originally over 5 million votes ahead immediately after the election.  That has shrunk to about half.  He has also dropped to under 50% of the popular vote so, if that holds, in all 3 presidential elections he has been unable to get 50% of the voters to support him.

 Certainly an optimistic individual.  
 

Anything to deal with the pain of losing is good therapy.

 

 

[oxo1947]

11 hours ago, newnative said:

He has also dropped to under 50% of the popular vote so, if that holds, in all 3 presidential elections he has been unable to get 50% of the voters to support him.

 

IN the last 70+ years the UK winner of elections having the majority of votes has only been once...Even Thatcher or the last landslide government in July (who got 33%)  votes didn't manage it--

 

Much the same in Oz ...etc  All of sudden when you lose very badly  --this becomes such an important Point........

[Baht Simpson]

15 hours ago, Bundooman said:

N - Nobber

TT - Turd tickler

BB - Bum boy

RM - Rug muncher (applies to whatever the sexual orientation is),

D - Dyke

 

How old are you?  4?

 

I thought this sort of thing was against forum rules. Plenty of pathetic and ignorant comments on this thread. 

 

 

 

[howlee101]

9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Dark ages await.

Only in your world.  We've been in the dark ages for the last 4 years.....and now the light is about to be turned back on.

[Jingthing]

54 minutes ago, howlee101 said:

Only in your world.  We've been in the dark ages for the last 4 years.....and now the light is about to be turned back on.

If by light, you mean tiki torches 

...

[Jingthing]

6 hours ago, oxo1947 said:

 

IN the last 70+ years the UK winner of elections having the majority of votes has only been once...Even Thatcher or the last landslide government in July (who got 33%)  votes didn't manage it--

 

Much the same in Oz ...etc  All of sudden when you lose very badly  --this becomes such an important Point........

Irrelevant in the context of the U.S. two party system. 

[Jingthing]

4 hours ago, Baht Simpson said:

How old are you?  4?

 

I thought this sort of thing was against forum rules. Plenty of pathetic and ignorant comments on this thread. 

 

 

 

Yeah it's weird.

Imagine a similar post about black people. 

So many people think they have a total pass on anti-gay bigotry and arguably they do.

 

[wombat]

18 hours ago, mdr224 said:

If you lefties wanted some checks and balances on trump then you shouldve been more competent these last four years. Only yourselves to blame

Yes they should have been and yes they are...leaving a mess for trumps to clean up looks like ww3 has been declared by Biden and crew

[Yagoda]

On 11/17/2024 at 10:54 AM, Jingthing said:

It's a fact genetically. 

Four days now after I asked the first time: 

 

Where is that Homosexual Gene?

[Baht Simpson]

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Four days now after I asked the first time: 

 

Where is that Homosexual Gene?

There is no evidence of a gay gene.  This was linked to a 1993 study which posited that a certain gene was linked to homosexuality but no other study was able to replicate it so it was debunked. 

 

What is interesting though is they know that a higher proportion of second children tend to be gay. This may be that if a mother has a boy the body produces an enhanced y chromosome to balance birth equality of the sexes to aid population growth. If this is the case then homosexuality is a perfectly natural condition of nature. Studies continue in this area.

 

They have attempted to prove a homophobia gene, but as yet there is no proof because the tiny brains of these people make study difficult. 😀 

[Yagoda]

21 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

There is no evidence of a gay gene.  This was linked to a 1993 study which posited that a certain gene was linked to homosexuality but no other study was able to replicate it so it was debunked. 

 

What is interesting though is they know that a higher proportion of second children tend to be gay. This may be that if a mother has a boy the body produces an enhanced y chromosome to balance birth equality of the sexes to aid population growth. If this is the case then homosexuality is a perfectly natural condition of nature. Studies continue in this area.

 

They have attempted to prove a homophobia gene, but as yet there is no proof because the tiny brains of these people make study difficult. 😀 

Who is "they" lol?

 

Homophobia. I guess my question is whether that even exists, since the predicate of the "phobia" would be irrationality. Thats a term subject to manipulation by the homosexual lobby and their supposed "allies" in the Left*. Is it irrational to feel disgust by the behavior of homosexuals? How about Coprophilia? Is it ok to be coprophobic?

 

How does the rational disgust over unnatural things equate to hate?

 

* I use the term "allies" because the Left cares nothing for so called "gay rights", but merely views them as a weapon to smash "bourgeois" and Judeo Christian morality. Thus, the National Socialist Movement was led by proud homosexuals until power struggles mandated that their bohemian movement be disavowed and driven back underground. Similarly, "gay" life flourished under the Bolshevik NEP until again, politics mandated suppression. The reason is patently obvious: any "organization" of individuals outside that which is permitted by Socialism is a danger to the state. I would note that in National Socialist Germany, homosexuality was illegal, as it was in Bolshevik Russia, and still is,

Edited 10 hours ago by Yagoda

[howlee101]

9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

If by light, you mean tiki torches 

...

Still will be #47😎.  I'm sure you can find a safe space to cry and scream for the next 4 years 😏

[Baht Simpson]

7 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Who is "they" lol?

 

Homophobia. I guess my question is whether that even exists, since the predicate of the "phobia" would be irrationality. Thats a term subject to manipulation by the homosexual lobby and their supposed "allies" in the Left*. Is it irrational to feel disgust by the behavior of homosexuals? How about Coprophilia? Is it ok to be coprophobic?

 

How does the rational disgust over unnatural things equate to hate?

 

* I use the term "allies" because the Left cares nothing for so called "gay rights", but merely views them as a weapon to smash "bourgeois" and Judeo Christian morality. Thus, the National Socialist Movement was led by proud homosexuals until power struggles mandated that their bohemian movement be disavowed and driven back underground. Similarly, "gay" life flourished under the Bolshevik NEP until again, politics mandated suppression. The reason is patently obvious: any "organization" of individuals outside that which is permitted by Socialism is a danger to the state. I would note that in National Socialist Germany, homosexuality was illegal, as it was in Bolshevik Russia, and still is,

Lol. I answer a question you raised about a gay gene and you start ranting on about the left,  American Nazis, Bolsheviks and scatology, none of which is relevant. 

 

It's hard to take you as a serious commentator when you do that but I'll try to address your further concerns. 

 

"They" are obviously the people who conducted the studies. I would have thought that was obvious. 

 

Is it irrational to be disgusted by the behavior of homosexuality? Well it depends what they're doing I guess. 😉 Same as heterosexuals. But you being disgusted (like being offended)  is your problem, not anyone else's. 

 

How does rational disgust over unnatural things equate to hate? If you're trying to say that homosexuality is unnatural then we part company in our views. In any case nobody cares what you are disgusted by as I've said. However if that disgust and hate turn to prejudice and discrimination we do have a problem. That's the problem we sometimes see here.

 

Your last paragraph has no real relevance to the discussion.

 

Nice to talk with you. 

 

[Jingthing]

6 hours ago, howlee101 said:

Still will be #47😎.  I'm sure you can find a safe space to cry and scream for the next 4 years 😏

It's the burned Trump voters that are going to be crying. I already know the magnitufe of the mistake that they made.