this is a really comprehensive and sensible reply to a question that can't really be answered.
I would merely add that the whole "angle" from which the article is written wrongly assumes that it is the Thai pooying who must do all the changing, while the male gazing on can simply tick boxes as she conforms to this or that demand. Recipe for failure when that is the starting point.
Learn to read, I asked what HIS problem is with adoption. I don't have any issues with it.
Go mop some floors but don't sniff too much of the cleaning material.
I'm not sure that the result would have been any different but Merkel's actions wrt illegal migration - well intentional as they might have been - have had catastrophic consequences for all of Europe.
"Can't vouch for it being true, but I read that the agreement with the Philippines was to keep the flow of healthcare staff from there to the UK sweet as the UK system would collapse without them"
Yeah right !I think not ,the fact it was made 80years ago had nothing to do of keeping Filipino nurses "sweet" You read it nowhere.
why would they be looking for something thats legal in Thailand?
Edited 3 hours ago by wombat
Please be more careful with your quotes. I didn't say that.... That was a partial quote from a comment another user posted, which I was commenting on....
Other than that, I don't believe it's accurate, at all, to say that transporting 53.65 kilograms of cannabis through the airport is legal in Thailand.
Not until next April though eh? According to Labours own study there will be at least 4000 pensioners who will not survive this winter due to the removal by Labour of the Winter fuel allowance to benefit from this policy that the Tories introduced.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now