Meta Donates $1M to Trump Inaugural Fund Amid Complicated Relationship

[Social Media]

 

Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, announced a $1 million donation to President-elect Donald Trump’s inaugural fund, marking the latest twist in a tumultuous relationship between the company and the former president. A Meta spokesperson confirmed the donation following a report by The Wall Street Journal.

 

This gesture comes after a series of tense exchanges between Trump and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. During the campaign, Trump threatened Zuckerberg with “life in prison” if he engaged in actions Trump deemed illegal during the election. Despite this, the two shared a dinner last month at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, a meeting that highlighted the complex dynamics between the pair.

 

Zuckerberg refrained from endorsing any candidate during the campaign, including Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris. However, he did openly praise Trump’s defiance after a July assassination attempt, calling the former president’s raised fist following the incident “one of the most badass things I’ve ever seen in my life.”

 

Meta’s relationship with Trump has long been fraught, reflecting broader challenges the company faces in navigating politics. Trump’s 2016 campaign heavily credited Facebook with enabling effective voter outreach through digital advertising. However, the company took a starkly different stance in 2021, suspending Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts following the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Although those accounts have since been reinstated, Meta has emphasized efforts to reduce the prominence of political content in its users’ feeds.

 

Looking ahead, Meta and other tech firms are keenly aware of the Trump administration’s potential influence on federal policy over the next four years. Issues such as artificial intelligence regulation and antitrust enforcement remain critical for the industry. During Trump’s first term, the Federal Trade Commission, led by a mix of Trump and Democratic appointees, initiated a lawsuit seeking to break up Meta, then operating as Facebook. That case, filed in December 2020, remains unresolved.

 

The company’s connections to Trump extend beyond Zuckerberg. Meta board member Marc Andreessen revealed that he has devoted significant time since the election assisting with Trump’s transition efforts at Mar-a-Lago. Peter Thiel, a former Meta board member and longtime Trump adviser, also continues to be a significant presence in Trump’s orbit.

 

Meta’s donation underscores the intricate balancing act it faces in maintaining relationships with political leaders while managing its vast influence over public discourse. The company’s role in shaping how billions of users access news and information remains a focal point of its ongoing engagement with governments worldwide.

 

Based on a report by NBC News 2024-12-12

 

 

 

[mikeymike100]

Does he know something, we don't?

[stevenl]

Influence buying. This should not be allowed.

[RocketDog]

Shameful pandering to power.

Disgusting.

Is there anything associated with these two that isn't?

[quake]

What a little Zucker.

 

[Thingamabob]

54 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Influence buying. This should not be allowed.

Dream on....

[Scott Tracy]

2 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

Does he know something, we don't?

He knows how to butter up. Nothing if not flexible and the inevitability of being targeted seems to have focussed Meta's strategy going forward. All for the greater good, of course...

[Liverpool Lou]

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

Influence buying. This should not be allowed.

$400,000,000 to the 2020 campaign is ok, though?

[Liverpool Lou]

1 hour ago, RocketDog said:

Shameful pandering to power.

Disgusting.

Is there anything associated with these two that isn't?

No, the equally "disgusting" Democrats are even more associated with him than anyone, or anything else ($400m)!

[stevenl]

19 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

$400,000,000 to the 2020 campaign is ok, though?

I presume you're referring to the donations made during covid when elections were transitioning to mail in voting? 

 

From AP

"But election officials have said there is no indication of favoritism in how the money was distributed, according to previous AP reports. The board of the Center for Tech and Civic Life also includes Pam Anderson, a Republican and former elected clerk of a suburban Denver-area county. Republican election officials have also vouched for the program’s impartiality, including Brian Mead, a Republican election director in Licking County, Ohio."

 

I agree with you that the political donations are subverting democracy, the SC made a major mistake there.

[Bkk Brian]

11 hours ago, Social Media said:

Zuckerberg refrained from endorsing any candidate during the campaign

A zavvy zucky. Just a little sweetner now to repair the relationship that was in very bad shape.

[thaipo7]

2 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

Does he know something, we don't?

He knows he gave Democrats $417 million in 2020 election to defeat Trump and now Trump will be in power.

[thaipo7]

48 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

$400,000,000 to the 2020 campaign is ok, though?

Yes, it was the Democrats.

[candide]

51 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

$400,000,000 to the 2020 campaign is ok, though?

 

49 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, the equally "disgusting" Democrats are even more associated with him than anyone, or anything else ($400m)!

 

4 minutes ago, thaipo7 said:

He knows he gave Democrats $417 million in 2020 election to defeat Trump and now Trump will be in power.

 

3 minutes ago, thaipo7 said:

Yes, it was the Democrats.

As usual, you are posting lies! 🤣

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-mark-zuckerberg-election-donations-188810437774

[nauseus]

53 minutes ago, candide said:

 

 

 

As usual, you are posting lies! 🤣

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-mark-zuckerberg-election-donations-188810437774

 

You're right. Most of the money enabled vastly increased mail-in balloting in 2020. Oh, wait a sec!

 

https://apnews.com/article/technology-elections-denver-mark-zuckerberg-election-2020-92257bbc1fefd9ed0e18861e5b5913f6

 

[candide]

40 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

You're right. Most of the money enabled vastly increased mail-in balloting in 2020. Oh, wait a sec!

 

https://apnews.com/article/technology-elections-denver-mark-zuckerberg-election-2020-92257bbc1fefd9ed0e18861e5b5913f6

 

And? Are you making the ridiculous claim that the 2020 election was rigged? 😆

[OneManShow]

18 hours ago, Social Media said:

announced a $1 million donation to President-elect Donald Trump’s inaugural fund, marking the latest twist in a tumultuous relationship between the company and the former president.

1M  ? 🤔 😂🤣

[nauseus]

5 hours ago, candide said:

And? Are you making the ridiculous claim that the 2020 election was rigged? 😆

 

And? My feeling was always that it was fixed. And, before you ask, of course I can't prove it.

 

And... how do you figure those bonus 10m+ extra total votes tallied in 2020 went AWOL again in 2024?

[Cryingdick]

It's good to see trump and some off our brightest tech people getting together to exchange ideas. can you imagine Joe bringing us into the Ai tech revolution over the next 4 years? The relentless attacks of the Biden admin on the tech companies is over. At some point wer are going to need their expertise. Biden seemed to despise anybody with an IQ 0ver 100 and more than $600 in the bank.

[Luuk Chaai]

what a choice ! 

[candide]

14 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

And? My feeling was always that it was fixed. And, before you ask, of course I can't prove it.

 

And... how do you figure those bonus 10m+ extra total votes tallied in 2020 went AWOL again in 2024?

Your reasoning is flawed, and the number you cite is very innacurate. 😆

[candide]

12 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

It's good to see trump and some off our brightest tech people getting together to exchange ideas. can you imagine Joe bringing us into the Ai tech revolution over the next 4 years? The relentless attacks of the Biden admin on the tech companies is over. At some point wer are going to need their expertise. Biden seemed to despise anybody with an IQ 0ver 100 and more than $600 in the bank.

More cult syndrom....😆

 

The AI revolution has already occured under Biden, in case you didn't notice, and the digital ecosystem doesn't need a moron like Trump (or anyone else) to "exchange ideas"

[nauseus]

4 minutes ago, candide said:

Your reasoning is flawed, and the number you cite is very innacurate. 😆

 

Flawed> Easy for you to say. But not me.

 

The number I gave is conservative. The quoted example  shows a difference of 12 million: 

 

On Tuesday, November 5th, Americans went to the polls in large numbers.  Some 143 million citizens cast ballots; 83 million of these during early voting. This compares to 155 million in 2020, which set a turnout record.

 

(see below):

 

https://osce.usmission.gov/on-the-results-of-the-general-elections-held-in-the-united-states-of-america-on-5-november-2024/

[candide]

2 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Flawed> Easy for you to say. But not me.

 

The number I gave is conservative. The quoted example  shows a difference of 12 million: 

 

On Tuesday, November 5th, Americans went to the polls in large numbers.  Some 143 million citizens cast ballots; 83 million of these during early voting. This compares to 155 million in 2020, which set a turnout record.

 

(see below):

 

https://osce.usmission.gov/on-the-results-of-the-general-elections-held-in-the-united-states-of-america-on-5-november-2024/

You are obviously not up to date, the latest count is 155,419,638, not 143 million. 😀

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

 

Of course, the MAGA outlets which feed you with news won't publicise it!...

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, candide said:

You are obviously not up to date, the latest count is 155,419,638, not 143 million. 😀

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

 

Of course, the MAGA outlets which feed you with news won't publicise it!...

 

 

OK use wiki then, most sources seem to have different totals.

 

But for 2024 even wiki on has a total vote of 152m (as popular vote for Trump then Harris 77,269,255 +74,983,555).

 

But also from wiki (for 2020) total is 155+.

 

Popular vote	81,283,501[1]	74,223,975[1]
Percentage	51.3%	46.8%

[candide]

31 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

 

OK use wiki then, most sources seem to have different totals.

 

But for 2024 even wiki on has a total vote of 152m (as popular vote for Trump then Harris 77,269,255 +74,983,555).

 

But also from wiki (for 2020) total is 155+.

 

Popular vote	81,283,501[1]	74,223,975[1]
Percentage	51.3%	46.8%

No, look toward the end of the article. The total number of votes includes votes for all candidates (incl. Stein, etc...) and it's 155,419,638, as of 10 December. It was 158,429,631 in 2020. A variation of +/- 3 million votes (+/-2%)  between elections is not particularly exceptional.

[nauseus]

2 hours ago, candide said:

No, look toward the end of the article. The total number of votes includes votes for all candidates (incl. Stein, etc...) and it's 155,419,638, as of 10 December. It was 158,429,631 in 2020. A variation of +/- 3 million votes (+/-2%)  between elections is not particularly exceptional.

 

 

But the difference (and drop) in the total the Dem POTUS candidate vote is exceptional.

 

All from wiki:

 

Biden 2020

81,283,501

 

Harris 2024

75,015,834