.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
Trump supports immigration visas backed by Musk: ‘I have many H-1B visas on
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
0
Elon Musk Advocates for Tommy Robinson’s Release Amid Criticism of UK Leadership
Elon Musk has sparked controversy by calling for the release of Tommy Robinson from prison while criticizing prominent UK political figures, including Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer. The billionaire and founder of Tesla shared a series of tweets supporting Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, and accused Starmer of failing to address grooming gangs in Oldham during his tenure as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) from 2008 to 2013. Musk promoted a YouTube documentary by Robinson, claiming it sheds light on political biases within the judicial system against right-wing figures. He described the video as "worth watching" and suggested it illustrates deeper systemic issues. Musk further called for a new election in Britain, citing Starmer's alleged unpopularity as a key reason. The entrepreneur also targeted Labour MP Jess Phillips, the minister for safeguarding, after reports from GB News suggested she had dismissed calls for a public inquiry into the grooming gangs in Oldham. Musk tweeted, “They oppose an inquiry because it will show that those in power were complicit in the cover-up.” He went on to state that Phillips “deserves to be in prison” for her stance on the matter. In another tweet, Musk directly criticized Starmer’s record, writing: “In the UK, serious crimes such as rape require the Crown Prosecution Service’s approval for the police to charge suspects. Who was the head of the CPS when rape gangs were allowed to exploit young girls without facing justice? Keir Starmer, 2008-2013. Who is the boss of Jess Phillips right now? Keir Starmer. The real reason she’s refusing to investigate the rape gangs is that it would obviously lead to the blaming of Keir Starmer (head of the CPS at the time).” Phillips defended her position by stating that the Home Office believes the matter can be handled at the local council level. She emphasized that Oldham council could lead its own inquiry without government intervention. Meanwhile, Starmer has countered Musk's claims, pointing to actions he took during his tenure as director of public prosecutions. In 2013, Starmer initiated legal proceedings against the Rochdale grooming gangs and implemented reforms in how the CPS addresses cases of child sexual abuse. Starmer also criticized previous Conservative governments for failing to introduce a mandatory duty to report safeguarding issues. He has maintained that considerations of ethnicity or “political correctness” should never interfere with bringing offenders to justice. Robinson, a controversial figure known for his far-right activism, is currently serving an 18-month prison sentence after admitting to breaching an injunction. This follows a successful libel suit against him in 2021. Musk’s public support for Robinson and his critique of the UK’s handling of grooming gang cases have drawn both praise and criticism, reigniting debates over justice, political accountability, and free speech. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-01-03 -
0
FBI Foils Alleged Plot Targeting AIPAC in Florida
The FBI has disrupted an alleged plan to target employees at a Florida office of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), according to court documents filed on Monday. Forrest Kendall Pemberton, the accused, was arrested after traveling to Plantation, Florida, armed with several firearms, including an AR-15 rifle, reportedly intending to scout the location before returning with weapons. The affidavit, signed by FBI Special Agent Taylor Nicklin, outlines Pemberton’s activities leading up to his arrest. On December 25, the first night of Hanukkah, Pemberton was intercepted in a ride-share vehicle while carrying firearms. Although the court documents do not explicitly name AIPAC, they describe the targeted organization as one that “advocates and lobbies for ‘pro-Israel policies that strengthen and expand the U.S.-Israel relationship,’” language directly associated with AIPAC’s mission. The case came to light after Pemberton’s father contacted authorities on December 23, reporting that his son had left home and left behind a troubling letter. In the letter, Pemberton expressed intentions to "close the loop," "stoke the flames," and bid farewell to his family. A subsequent investigation revealed that his computer had been used for searches and Google Maps queries related to AIPAC’s former Plantation office, as well as IRS offices. Pemberton’s movements suggested careful planning. On December 22, he checked into a hotel two miles from AIPAC’s former location and checked out the following day. He was later tracked to a Tallahassee hotel, where he was seen on Christmas Day entering a ride-share vehicle with what appeared to be a soft rifle case. In conversations with law enforcement, Pemberton admitted he chose AIPAC as his target due to its “political influence” and proximity. Frustrated with the “status quo,” he indicated he had sought to "make a change." However, he claimed he ultimately decided against taking any criminal action. “It would have been a one-way ticket. In Plantation, I decided I wasn’t ready. I gave up,” Pemberton reportedly told police, according to the affidavit. The case underscores the importance of vigilance in preventing potential acts of violence, particularly against organizations with high political visibility. The FBI’s swift intervention prevented what could have been a devastating attack during a significant holiday period. Based on a report by The Hill 2024-01-03 -
0
Keir Starmer and Elon Musk Clash Over UK Investment and Policies
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has found himself in a renewed conflict with tech billionaire Elon Musk, following Musk's claim that "very few companies" are interested in investing in the UK. Musk's criticism, delivered via his social media platform X, accused the "current administration" of fostering policies that dissuade investment, sparking yet another row between the two high-profile figures. Musk’s comments come as a jab at Starmer's first six months in office, a period during which the Labour leader has focused on positioning his government as pro-business and pro-growth. In response to Musk’s assertion, a spokesperson for No. 10 Downing Street firmly defended the administration, pointing to substantial progress made since the general election. “I’m not going to get into commentary on individual comments," said the prime minister’s official spokesman. "But if you look at what’s happened since the election, you’ve seen £63 billion of additional investment from the investment summit. The government has addressed key concerns from businesses, particularly around stability, both politically and economically.” The spokesperson reiterated that Starmer’s government remains "unashamedly pro-growth and pro-business." This latest episode follows a string of tense exchanges between Musk and the UK government. During the summer riots in Southport, Musk controversially claimed that civil war in the UK was “inevitable.” His remarks, compounded by his engagement with posts from far-right activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, also known as Tommy Robinson, and his retweeting of a fabricated headline about rioters being sent to detention camps in the Falkland Islands, drew widespread condemnation. The summer controversy reportedly influenced Musk’s exclusion from a prominent investment summit in London. At the time, Musk criticized the UK government, stating: “I don’t think anyone should go to the UK when they’re releasing convicted paedophiles in order to imprison people for social media posts.” Despite the friction, Musk has maintained connections with British political figures. While Rishi Sunak served as prime minister, Musk attended an AI safety summit as a guest of honor and participated in an event with Sunak. This stark contrast in relationships has added to the complexity of Musk's interactions with the current administration. Most recently, Musk rejected calls to build a new Tesla plant in Scotland, reiterating his skepticism about the UK's business climate under Starmer. "Very few companies will be willing to invest in the UK with the current administration," he posted on X on Sunday. Adding fuel to the fire, Musk is rumored to be considering a multi-million dollar donation to Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, further emphasizing his alignment with figures outside the mainstream political establishment. The tumultuous relationship between Musk and the Labour government reflects broader tensions over the UK’s business policies and political stability. While Starmer’s administration highlights billions in new investments as evidence of progress, Musk’s public criticism signals persistent skepticism from influential global entrepreneurs. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-01-03 -
0
Steve Bannon Clashes with Elon Musk: "We’re Going to Rip Your Face Off"
Former White House strategist Steve Bannon issued a stark warning to Elon Musk, accusing the tech mogul of undermining American workers by supporting visas for skilled foreign laborers. On Tuesday, during his "War Room" podcast, Bannon lashed out, cautioning Musk and others in the tech industry that they would face fierce opposition from MAGA supporters unless they embraced a stricter "America First" stance on immigration. The tech billionaire has faced backlash from MAGA circles for supporting programs like the H-1B visa, which provides opportunities for skilled foreign workers in sectors like technology. Bannon, a staunch critic of such policies, argued that these visas have displaced American workers and eroded the country’s middle class. He even called for a complete halt to all immigration, stating, “We need a 100% moratorium on all immigration until we get this thing sorted.” This clash isn’t Musk’s first brush with controversy over immigration. The entrepreneur recently made headlines with a fiery comment on X (formerly Twitter), directing opponents of H-1B visas to “F*** yourself in the face.” Musk’s call for a more “positive” and “beautiful” social media conversation shortly afterward struck many as ironic, given his own confrontational tone. Bannon, however, wasn’t swayed by Musk’s appeals for civility. Instead, he doubled down, demanding “reparations” from Musk and other tech leaders for what he views as the systemic displacement of American workers. “The visa issue is central to the way they gutted the middle class in this country,” Bannon argued, expressing his belief that tech industry policies have betrayed the very ethos of Trump’s "America First" agenda. Musk’s stance has also put him at odds with some of Donald Trump’s most loyal supporters. While Trump himself has praised the contributions of foreign workers under H-1B visas, this has led to friction within his base, many of whom see such policies as contrary to his promises to protect U.S. jobs. As tensions between Bannon and Musk escalate, the debate over immigration, labor, and the future of America’s workforce shows no sign of abating. Whether Musk will adjust his position or continue to stand firm against critics like Bannon remains to be seen. Based on a report by The Independent 2024-01-03 -
0
Palestinian Authority Halts Al Jazeera Broadcasts Over Its "inciting content"
The Palestinian Authority announced on Wednesday that it has suspended all broadcasts by the Qatar-based network Al Jazeera throughout Palestinian territories, accusing the channel of disseminating "inciting content," as reported by the official Wafa news agency. A ministerial committee, comprising representatives from the ministries of culture, interior, and communications, issued the directive. The committee stated, "The decision also includes temporarily freezing the work of all journalists, employees, crews, and affiliated channels until their legal status is rectified due to Al Jazeera's violations of the laws and regulations in force in Palestine." The report elaborated that the move was prompted by Al Jazeera's "insistence on broadcasting inciting content and reports characterised by misinformation, incitement, sedition, and interference in Palestinian internal affairs." An Al Jazeera staff member in Ramallah confirmed to AFP that the network's office had received the suspension notice. Subsequently, the channel aired footage of what appeared to be Palestinian security personnel delivering the orders to the office. However, Al Jazeera has yet to publicly respond to the decision. The move sparked condemnation from various groups, including Hamas, which labelled the suspension as an infringement on civil liberties. "This decision aligns with a series of recent arbitrary actions taken by the Authority to curtail public rights and freedoms and to reinforce its security grip on the Palestinian people," Hamas said in a statement. They urged the Palestinian Authority to reverse its decision immediately, emphasizing the importance of preserving media freedom to "expose the occupation and support the steadfastness of our people." Islamic Jihad, a Gaza-based group allied with Hamas, also criticized the suspension. "We condemn the authority's decision to close Al Jazeera's office in Palestine when our people and our cause are in dire need to convey their suffering to the world," the group stated. Based on a report by AFP 2024-01-03 Related Topic: Crackdown in West Bank: Palestinian Authority’s Battle Against Militants Al Jazeera’s Terrorist Ties and the Controversy Over Its Operations Al Jazeera journalist reportedly moonlights as Hamas commander claims IDF Israeli Forces Rescue Hostages, Held By Al Jazeera & Palestine Chronicle Journalist Exposing What Others Prefer to Hide The Dismal State of Hamas Propoganda by Media -
0
FBI Uncovers Largest Explosive Cache in its History on Virginia Farm
The FBI has discovered more than 150 explosive devices during a raid on a farm in Isle of Wight County, Virginia, marking the largest seizure of finished bombs in the agency’s history. The raid, conducted on December 17, resulted in the arrest of Brad Spafford, who lived on the 20-acre property with his wife and two young children. The investigation began after a tip-off from a neighbor, who reported suspicious activity on the farm. The neighbor, a former law enforcement officer, wore a recording device during a visit to the property earlier this year, gathering evidence that prompted the FBI to act. The devices were found scattered across the property, with many located in a detached garage. According to court documents, the bombs were sorted by color and some were labeled “lethal.” Additional explosive devices were discovered inside the home, including several stored unsecured in a backpack marked "#nolivesmatter," a slogan associated with a far-right, anti-government movement promoting extremist violence. The FBI also uncovered a jar of HMTD, a highly volatile and unstable explosive capable of detonating from minor temperature changes. The jar was found in a freezer alongside food accessible to the children living in the home. Some bombs were rigged into a wearable vest, adding to the alarming nature of the find. Spafford allegedly used photos of President Joe Biden for target practice and expressed hope for the assassination of Vice President Kamala Harris. According to court papers, he had recently pursued sniper-rifle training and was reportedly planning to fortify the farm with a turret-mounted .50-caliber firearm. The neighbor who alerted authorities also revealed that Spafford had lost three fingers in 2021 while working with a homemade explosive but continued manufacturing bombs despite the injury. So far, Spafford has been charged with possession of an unregistered short-barrel rifle, but prosecutors have indicated that additional charges are likely. His attorney has denied that he poses a threat to the community, describing the government’s allegations as “rank speculation and fear mongering.” “There is not a shred of evidence in the record that Mr. Spafford ever threatened anyone, and the contention that someone might be in danger because of their political views and comments is nonsensical,” the defense lawyer argued. Despite the attorney’s assertions, the cache has raised serious concerns. In addition to the bombs, investigators say Spafford subscribed to conspiracy theories, claiming that missing children in the news were being taken by the federal government to be trained as school shooters. A federal judge initially ordered Spafford’s release under electronic monitoring, but that decision is on hold as prosecutors push for his continued detention, citing the immense risk posed by the explosive devices and his extremist views. The investigation continues as authorities assess the full extent of the threat posed by the largest stockpile of explosives ever seized by the FBI. Based on a report by BBC 2024-01-03 -
0
Neil Young Withdraws from Glastonbury, Citing BBC Corporate Influence
Legendary musician Neil Young has announced his withdrawal from the upcoming Glastonbury Festival, citing concerns over the BBC's "corporate control" of the event. Young, who had planned to perform with his new band, The Chrome Hearts, expressed disappointment in a statement on his website, calling the festival a "corporate turn-off." "The Chrome Hearts and I were looking forward to playing Glastonbury, one of my all-time favourite outdoor gigs," Young wrote. "We were told that the BBC was now a partner in Glastonbury and wanted us to do a lot of things in a way we were not interested in. It seems Glastonbury is now under corporate control and is not the way I remember it being." Young, 79, made it clear that the decision was final. "We will not be playing Glastonbury on this tour because it is a corporate turn-off, and not for me like it used to be. Hope to see you at one of the other venues on the tour. Love Neil. Be well." The BBC and Glastonbury organizers have yet to comment on the matter. The festival, known for its eclectic line-ups and cultural significance, has partnered with the BBC since 1997. Emily Eavis, who co-organizes the event with her father, Michael, has previously described the broadcaster’s live coverage as “an integral part of what we do at Glastonbury.” While Young did not elaborate on the specific requirements imposed by the BBC that led to his decision, his concerns highlight a broader debate about the influence of corporate partnerships on artistic freedom. This marks a significant moment for Glastonbury, a festival steeped in tradition and independence, which Young himself has celebrated in the past. He headlined the event in 2009, delivering a memorable two-hour performance that included classics such as *Heart of Gold* and *Rockin’ In The Free World.* The 2025 Glastonbury Festival is scheduled to take place from June 25-29. Thus far, the only confirmed performer is Sir Rod Stewart, who will appear in the iconic "Legend" slot. Tickets for the event, priced at £373.50, have already sold out. Young’s withdrawal has left fans disappointed but also sparked discussions about the balance between maintaining the festival’s spirit and embracing modern partnerships. As Young’s open letter suggests, his departure from Glastonbury may resonate beyond the festival grounds, serving as a reminder of the challenges artists face in navigating an increasingly corporate-dominated music industry. Based on a report by Daily telegraph 2024-01-03 -
0
Migrant Crossings Rise: A Challenge for the UK Under Starmer
The number of migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats rose significantly in 2024, marking the second-highest annual total on record. According to Home Office statistics, 36,816 individuals made the perilous journey, a 25 percent increase from 2023. The surge intensified after Sir Keir Starmer assumed office in July, with arrivals rising by 29 percent during his tenure compared to the same period in 2023. This marked a sharp contrast with the smaller increase under former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak earlier in the year, when crossings grew by 19 percent. While Sunak's tenure saw incremental growth, Starmer’s period in office coincided with a dramatic escalation, drawing criticism from opposition parties. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp described the rise as evidence that Labour had "totally failed on illegal immigration by small boat," adding, "Over three times more illegal immigrants crossed in December compared to last year – an insult to the British people. Labour has lost control of our borders." Reform Party deputy leader Richard Tice echoed these sentiments, stating, "Far from smashing the gangs, it’s only getting worse under Labour. Labour needs to start putting British people first and not allowing our borders to be at the whim of the weather." The year’s data underscores the continuing challenge posed by small boat crossings. Only 2022 surpassed 2024 in the number of arrivals, with a record 45,774 migrants that year. Before this surge, the numbers were comparatively low, with just 299 crossings recorded in 2018 and 1,843 in 2019. However, as the issue gained prominence, the figures climbed steadily to 8,466 in 2020 and 28,526 in 2021. The primary nationalities of migrants reflected ongoing global crises. Afghan nationals accounted for the largest group, representing 17 percent of arrivals in the first nine months of 2024. They were followed by individuals from Vietnam (13 percent), Iran (12 percent), and Syria (12 percent). The Starmer administration’s approach diverged sharply from that of the preceding Conservative government. One of Starmer’s first actions as Prime Minister was to scrap the controversial Rwanda deportation plan, which he declared "dead and buried." Instead, Labour shifted focus to dismantling smuggling networks and enhancing international cooperation. "If the boats and the engines aren’t available, it obviously makes it much more difficult for these crossings to be made," Starmer remarked, emphasizing the importance of targeting the infrastructure behind the crossings. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper underscored the government’s moral responsibility to address the issue, stating the need to "go after" smuggling gangs. However, she declined to set a specific deadline for reducing arrivals and appeared to dismiss the idea of expanding safe and legal routes for asylum seekers. The final days of 2024 highlighted the unpredictable nature of the crisis. While blustery weather conditions halted crossings on December 30 and 31, 291 individuals successfully reached the UK on December 29 in six small boats. The year’s events illustrate the complexity of managing migration and the challenges of balancing domestic expectations with humanitarian obligations. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-01-03
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now