Jump to content

Elon Musk Advocates for Tommy Robinson’s Release Amid Criticism of UK Leadership


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 1/3/2025 at 10:20 AM, Yagoda said:

Deport a British citizen for thought crime yet let Muslim rape gangs and terrs run free? Got it

Yep. Simon and his wishy washy ilk should look a bit more into it, though I guess when you are that far left gone, there's no reasoning. It is a shame they can't just be ignored, but unfortunately their puerile opinion counts more than any nowadays. Tommy may be antagonistic, but he says it how it is and at least the guy is born and bred and gives a S about the people of Britain. Of course, we can't have that can we, flag waving and whatnot! It is pathetic.

 

Britain as we knew it is well gone (the brainwashed above have seen to that inside a generation) and you could not pay me enough to live there again. Apparently Musk reckons even Farage is too soft for not getting behind Tommy. Dunno about that, but I hope he brings the whole system down. If ever a once proud place was in dire need of a reboot...

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Yaxley-Lennon will be released from prison once he’s served his sentence.

 

It’s then a fair bet that before too long  his recidivism will get the better of him and he’ll wind up behind bars again.

 

 

You arent following this closely. The worlds most powerful voice has actually sat down and watched Silenced. Everyone that watches it and sees the evidence comes away changed. It is undeniable, and boy does Tommy have the receipts. 

I think Musk will get Robinson to replace Farage as Reform party leader, and liberal heads and supporters of the estsblishment narrative over actual truth will implode. Watch this space...

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

You are  not making progress. One of the  most common excuses criminals offer when caught in fraud is that they were going to pay the money back. I will make is very simple for you.

True or false;

.

 

    The money was a mortgage to buy a house .

If they didn't pay that money back, the bank would repossess the house 

The bank kept the house until the money was paid back .

You don't have much of a clue about this case 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

He  engineered and organized a scheme upon which  money from the proceeds of crime would be invested in real estate.

 

   The crime committed was using false pay slips to get a mortgage , as its difficult to get a mortgage if you are self employed 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

I do. You are looking at the mortgage transaction in isolation. It was part of a money laundering scheme. It is common practice for drug traffickers  and other criminals to launder their proceeds  through real estate transactions. Please do not ignore the fact that Lennon was also implicated in money laundering. The fact of the matter is that he was guilty of mortgage fraud. All the convoluted claims of innocent intent did not  convince the rather dour conservative judge who was presiding. Gaming the systems which rely on individual honesty and integrity just makes it harder for honest hard working people to access the mortgage system.

 

  No, Tommy didn't launder money in any real estate, you are making that bit up , it isn't true .

   Once again you are being deceptive and dishonest .

Tommy helped a self employed friend get some fake payslips so he could apply for a mortgage .

   That mortgage would be repaid to the bank in the normal way .

No money was stolen 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, James105 said:

 

This has become a new obsession for Musk by the looks of things.  He has 3 times as many followers as there are people living in the UK and he is highlighting the fact that the UK authorities, with their current elected Prime Minister as the head of the prosecution service effectively aided and abetted the mass rape of children by pakistani men.   

 

 

Maybe, just maybe, this will put a stop to the girls who have been raped and/or will be raped by those who come from cultures who treat girls as sex slaves.   I would also like to see incarceration for all those responsible or participated in the cover up.  If Tommy Robinson can be given 18 months for the civil offence of contempt I would like to see sentences of at least 100 times that amount for every single rapist, councillor, MP, police office, judge, prosecutor who aided and abetted the rape of girls, some as young as 10 years old.  

 

 

Yea awful ,saw that. I didn't realize just how badly these poor girls suffered while officials turned a blind eye to these Islamic extremists and in many cases actively tried to stop any investigations on it. It truly is a national scandal that must be exposed to the fullest. 

 

image.png.cfeda41e0127bb5b099cd81634f3f937.png

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1875931298143084755

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yea awful ,saw that. I didn't realize just how badly these poor girls suffered while officials turned a blind eye to these Islamic extremists and in many cases actively tried to stop any investigations on it. It truly is a national scandal that must be exposed to the fullest. 

 

image.png.cfeda41e0127bb5b099cd81634f3f937.png

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1875931298143084755

 

 

The horrific case you're (or Elon) is referring to, which is from 2013, resulted in life sentences for the perpetrators, so not sure why you think a blind eye was turned?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 

The horrific case you're (or Elon is) referring to (from 2013) resulted in life sentences for the perpetrators, so not sure why you think a blind eye was turned?

Well yes, the quote is from the court case.................:saai:

 

If you think there were not similar going on 1000's in fact that have not been convicted and who I was obviously referring to then you also have your head buried in the sand and not even bothered reading previous investigations.

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Well yes, the quote is from the court case.................:saai:

 

If you think there were not similar going on 1000's in fact that have not been convicted and who I was obviously referring to then you also have your head buried in the sand and not even bothered reading previous investigations.

 

 

Apologies.  When you wrote: "I didn't realize just how badly these poor girls suffered while officials turned a blind eye to these Islamic extremists", I assumed "these" meant the girls and the perpetrators in the case referred to.  I just wanted to set the record straight about that particularly horrific case.

Posted
19 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Apologies.  When you wrote: "I didn't realize just how badly these poor girls suffered while officials turned a blind eye to these Islamic extremists", I assumed "these" meant the girls and the perpetrators in the case referred to.  I just wanted to set the record straight about that particularly horrific case.

Just because these scum got convicted does not mean these girls were not ignored and people turned a blind eye first as in other cases.

 

One of the victims reported the abuse to police in August 2008, stating that she was being given
alcohol and raped by multiple men. She provided police with her underwear, which was found to
contain traces of one of the men’s DNA. Two members of the abusive group were arrested and
released on bail; however, it took police 11 months to compile a brief of evidence for the Crown
Prosecution Service (CPS) after interviewing her on four occasions. In July 2009, an
‘experienced’ CPS lawyer ruled that the victim was ‘not credible’ and decided that the two men
who raped her should be released without charge. During this time she was sexually abused by
21 more men (Norfolk 2012a). The abuse of the girls continued until May 2010, ten months after
the case was dropped, when police revisited the investigation
after a Rochdale youth project
raised concerns about other complaints. Only then did the newly appointed chief crown
prosecutor, Nazir Afzal, reverse the decision not to prosecute the men.

https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/757/512

 

Get it now..................

 

However I was also referring obviously to all the other cases as has already been mentioned in this and other topics. No need to apologize for your misunderstanding, somethings just fly over peoples heads.

Posted
4 hours ago, James105 said:

Look at the energy you are giving to someone obtaining a mortgage by effectively lying about their earnings compared to the lack of energy you give about the mass rape of children by majority pakistani men that was covered up by the police, the CPS, the council, the MPs for decades, which led to the preventable rapes of tens of thousands of children.  

 

As far as this scandal is concerned, the whole point of some people people, whether at a conscious or unconscious level, is to shift attention to a blowhard like Robinson or  - obviously on a completely different level - an eccentric genius like Elon Musk.Anything repeat anything not to focus on the scandal you detail.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I see the Space Karen has turned on Farage. 
 

Farage for once being right on the matter, Yaxley-Lennon is where he belongs.

 

Robinson is where he is due to the fact the system protects child rapists from those who might expose them.  This is why the person who calls out child rape is in prison, and those who covered it up are not.   Nobody goes to jail for contempt (which is not a criminal offense it is a civil one), especially not to a category A prison in solitary confinement.

 

Musk is acting like a father who sees the industrial scale rape of children and its cover up as a horrendous off the scale injustice that should see those who aided and abetted in jail, and is rightly shocked that one of the most vocal in exposing this is in jail for spurious reasons.    As he is not a politician he is as confused as the rest of the right minded people about how come Robinson is in jail and Starmer, Phillips, Police, judges, social workers and every other scumbag that covered this up is not in jail.   

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted

Further to my previous post I see that a grass roots Labour Party pressure group has stated:

 

 “In the face of the systematic grooming and rape of young girls by mostly Pakistani men across English towns, progressives denied, obfuscated, equivocated, averted their eyes, changed the subject. Anything but look the dark side of multiculturalism squarely in the eye.

“Those who extol the benefits of immigration and multiculturalism most loudly seem to have little interest in what their policies have meant for towns across England. In liberal society, it is seen as impolite to talk about such things. This squeamishness is moral cowardice.

“We hope the attention on the most awful scandal in modern British history leads to justice for the victims. A national inquiry would be a start, but what is really needed is tougher sentencing, an end to political correctness and a total reset of our immigration policy.”

 

I

Posted
1 hour ago, James105 said:

 

Robinson is where he is due to the fact the system protects child rapists from those who might expose them.  This is why the person who calls out child rape is in prison, and those who covered it up are not.   Nobody goes to jail for contempt (which is not a criminal offense it is a civil one), especially not to a category A prison in solitary confinement.

 

Musk is acting like a father who sees the industrial scale rape of children and its cover up as a horrendous off the scale injustice that should see those who aided and abetted in jail, and is rightly shocked that one of the most vocal in exposing this is in jail for spurious reasons.    As he is not a politician he is as confused as the rest of the right minded people about how come Robinson is in jail and Starmer, Phillips, Police, judges, social workers and every other scumbag that covered this up is not in jail.   

Yaxley-Lennon is in prison because he committed ‘contempt of court’.

 

End of.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I see the Space Karen has turned on Farage. 
 

Farage for once being right on the matter, Yaxley-Lennon is where he belongs.

Farage would have orchestrated the 'apparent' turning by asking him beforehand to do so, to distance himself from the idiot.

Posted
1 minute ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Farage would have orchestrated the 'apparent' turning by asking him beforehand to do so, to distance himself from the idiot.

Well I wouldn’t be surprised auto Musk pinching an idea of Farage and presenting it as his own.

 

But it’s far more likely Farage simply isn’t far right enough for Musk.

 

He doesn’t seem to understand Farage owns Reform UK, its members are subscribers, they have day in who the leader shall be.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Yaxley-Lennon is in prison because he committed ‘contempt of court’.

 

End of.

 

He thinks by saying "End of" that anyone doesn't note the deflection away from the industrial level abuse and rape.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Well I wouldn’t be surprised auto Musk pinching an idea of Farage and presenting it as his own.

 

But it’s far more likely Farage simply isn’t far right enough for Musk.

 

He doesn’t seem to understand Farage owns Reform UK, its members are subscribers, they have day in who the leader shall be.

 

 

Do you know if Musk supported Apartheid in South Africa?

I wonder if he supports SA now, could be interesting. 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Do you know if Musk supported Apartheid in South Africa?

I wonder if he supports SA now, could be interesting. 

 

 

Why would you think the guy who is so clearly against the rape and establishment cover up of industrial scale rape of children be supportive of something like Apartheid?  I don't get the association here?  If your comment was "I wonder if those who covered up industrial scale rape of children (such as Keir Starmer) were also supportive of Apartheid it would make a bit more sense to me....

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

Why would you think the guy who is so clearly against the rape and establishment cover up of industrial scale rape of children be supportive of something like Apartheid?  I don't get the association here?  If your comment was "I wonder if those who covered up industrial scale rape of children (such as Keir Starmer) were also supportive of Apartheid it would make a bit more sense to me....

I never thought that. Musk is supporting Trump who has totally different foreign policies than South Africa for example SA - Focuses on peacekeeping, conflict resolution, and non-alignment in global conflicts.. Therefore, I was wondering where his allegiance lies being a dual citizen. 

As a dual citizen myself, I'm torn between Thai and UK foreign policies but favour Thailand.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

I never thought that. Musk is supporting Trump who has totally different foreign policies than South Africa. Therefore, I was wondering where his allegiance lies being a dual citizen. 

Anything to avoid the actual topic you mean.

 

How do you feel about the utter shame of those who failed to prosecute and hindered investigations because the rape Gangs were Pakistani Muslims? Tommy feels quite strongly about it, so does Elon

Posted
1 hour ago, jayboy said:

 

He thinks by saying "End of" that anyone doesn't note the deflection away from the industrial level abuse and rape.

Which was addressed in the Parliamentary Inquiry, instigated by the last Government.

Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Which was addressed in the Parliamentary Inquiry, instigated by the last Government.

That's the whole point, it was far from fully addressed in previous investigations, more deflection for the sheer vile abuse that went on under the noses of some and actively hidden by others all because they were Pakistani rape gangs

  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Which was addressed in the Parliamentary Inquiry, instigated by the last Government.

 

More deflection.Anything to avoid a full inquiry.Actually in this case I suspect the problem is simply ignorance.There were many areas which were not covered and in any event none of the recommendations 9which were sensible) have been implemented .

Posted
20 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Which was addressed in the Parliamentary Inquiry, instigated by the last Government.

 

How many social workers, police officers, politicians, councilors are in jail following their aiding and abetting of the mass rape of children?  Zero.  That is how many.   I don't think anyone even so much as lost their job over this, and this is why Musk is so outraged that this can happen, and why Tommy Robinson now has the richest man on the planet with the largest free speech platform supporting him.  The days where they can quietly put Robinson in a max security cat A prison in solitary confinement for contempt of court charges are over now.  They went too far with this and should have addressed the problem that Robinson was complaining about (child rapists) instead of pursuing Robinson for spurious politically biased contempt of court charges.   

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

How many social workers, police officers, politicians, councilors are in jail following their aiding and abetting of the mass rape of children?  Zero.  That is how many.   I don't think anyone even so much as lost their job over this, and this is why Musk is so outraged that this can happen, and why Tommy Robinson now has the richest man on the planet with the largest free speech platform supporting him.  The days where they can quietly put Robinson in a max security cat A prison in solitary confinement for contempt of court charges are over now.  They went too far with this and should have addressed the problem that Robinson was complaining about (child rapists) instead of pursuing Robinson for spurious politically biased contempt of court charges.   


How would a Parliamentary inquiry impact people being imprisoned? 
 

The history of Parliamentary Inquiries resulting in prison sentences can be demonstrated by the fact that the Hillsborough, Contaminated Blood, Post Office and Grenfell inquiries resulted one single criminal imprisonment.

 

There’s already been an inquiry, it was instigated by the last Tory Government which also set the terms of reference.

 

I’ll make a prediction, if a second inquiry does take place, you’ll all be back here claiming that too is a cover-up or some other fanciful conspiracy.
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...