Here's Your War Monger, MAGAs

[Njoku]

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Maybe you understand it.

Many of us, me included, try to understand what he says, and we try to make sense of it. But because he is lying all the time and is inconsistent all the time it just doesn't make any sense.

 

If you think you understand him then please explain his current rumbling about the Panama Canal and Greenland. Does this make any sense? What do you understand?

Or he is just an ahole who talks a lot without thinking? Maybe his fans think this is entertaining, but the rest of us think: Why does he do that? It doesn't make any sense.

 

Do the people of Greenland want to be part of America? NO! So, case closed. Shut up. 

I think you are wrong when you say "inconsistent" he is very consistent in behaviour and how he is in everyones face.

 

So its looking like back to the future, Regaonomics and a part of that was wanting open borders open trade around the world now 40 or so years later with there power slipping away its slam the gates shut and stick up tariffs.

 

Id be embarrassed if I was from the US, you guys haven't wont a trick since the end of the second world, might surprise them to know most of the world cant stand them, well politicly, thats there allies too, I for the life of me would like to understand why my government has hitched itself to a dead man walking.

 

 

[frank83628]

1 hour ago, RJRS1301 said:

I have never used the term conspiracy anywhere

I said it my only use of MAGA is saying they are stupid

I am allowed to posit an opinion, as are you allowed yours

It is part of a democratic notion to have robust debate which does not have to be in agreement.

'You' is plural, I could have said Lefty or libtards, there are also others l, but they get automatically deleted

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

'You' is plural, I could have said Lefty or libtards, there are also others l, but they get automatically deleted

Even though it was plural "you" still includes RJRS1301 since it was him that you were addressing.

[G_Money]

54 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Proven? The proofs is all over the place, unless there is Donald Trump AI talking on press conferences the last week, but it is the real Donald. 

What exactly are you trying to prove?

[jas007]

Trump is just being Trump. He says whatever is on his mind.  However, that doesn't necessarily mean most of it should be taken literally.  He just talks. It's hyperbole. That's his character.

 

And don't forget the history of U.S. foreign policy lately.  Warmongers from both parties, Neocons, American exceptionalism, causing trouble around the world to effect regime change, acting outside international law when  it's deemed to be "necessary."  There seems to be one set of rules for America, and another set of rules for the rest of the world.  And, judging by Trump's cabinet picks, I don't see much in the way of change ahead in the foreign policy arena, unfortunately, other than a recognition that the war in Ukraine is silly, unnecessary,  and never should have happened.  That will end with a deal and that's that. 

 

Trump is just saying out loud how things really work,  Smart or not, it's hard to deny history. 

[BangkokReady]

You haven't even said what your point is.  You got so excited to share this anti-Trump garbage, you forgot to say why this is bad.

 

What's your point?  Trump wants to do such and such, and that means...?

 

You people are so worked up over Trump you're not even able to make coherent points.

[Hummin]

5 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Trump is just being Trump. He says whatever is on his mind.  However, that doesn't necessarily mean most of it should be taken literally.  He just talks. It's hyperbole. That's his character.

 

And don't forget the history of U.S. foreign policy lately.  Warmongers from both parties, Neocons, American exceptionalism, causing trouble around the world to effect regime change, acting outside international law when  it's deemed to be "necessary."  There seems to be one set of rules for America, and another set of rules for the rest of the world.  And, judging by Trump's cabinet picks, I don't see much in the way of change ahead in the foreign policy arena, unfortunately, other than a recognition that the war in Ukraine is silly, unnecessary,  and never should have happened.  That will end with a deal and that's that. 

 

Trump is just saying out loud how things really work,  Smart or not, it's hard to deny history. 

Now Svalbard becomes a legitimate target for the Russians. Everything that man says, makes sure the opponent takes the same precautions and makes their moves accordingly to what they expect us to do. Trump heats up things even before he has taken the seat, and proves for allies he can't be trusted. 

 

It is a chess game where predictability among allies is the key to success, but Trump doesnt understand that, he is a simple golf player, with to many holes on his mind

 

Let’s Hide the Svalbard Treaty Before Trump Finds It

 

https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/lets-hide-svalbard-treaty-trump-finds-it

[spidermike007]

6 hours ago, G_Money said:

On the other side.

 

 

You criticize mainstream media most of the time and now you're glorifying it because your boy is on the cover. 

[RocketDog]

On 1/8/2025 at 12:04 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

Are you?!...

 

"Trump craves legitimacy and acknowledgment from the establishment he derides. He also thinks in terms of real estate.

 

As a sociopath, he does not care about the loss of life - on either side. " Suckers and losers" springs to mind.

 

He wants to go down in history as a great President. That's his narcissism.

 

He's unaware that ship has already sailed, with an anchor dragging".

No divination necessary.

Who and what he is has been too obvious to sane people for a very long time now.

 

It's only the low information crowd that still struggles with that reality. Just wait a while and it will all become clear to you.

You will wake up to nothing but soggy sticky sheets when your hate-charged dream ends.

 

[G_Money]

1 minute ago, spidermike007 said:

You criticize mainstream media most of the time and now you're glorifying it because your boy is on the cover. 

Occasionally they get it right.

 

Man of the year is all the proof I need.

[jas007]

15 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Now Svalbard becomes a legitimate target for the Russians. Everything that man says, makes sure the opponent takes the same precautions and makes their moves accordingly to what they expect us to do. Trump heats up things even before he has taken the seat, and proves for allies he can't be trusted. 

 

It is a chess game where predictability among allies is the key to success, but Trump doesnt understand that, he is a simple golf player, with to many holes on his mind

 

Let’s Hide the Svalbard Treaty Before Trump Finds It

 

https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/lets-hide-svalbard-treaty-trump-finds-it

Sure. The rules based international order exists. It's the foundation of diplomacy and it works so long as everyone is playing the same game. It makes for predictability.  But don't think for a minute that the world always works that way.  The United Nations was founded by way of a treaty, and how is that working?  Like I said, it's nice to pretend that countries will play by the rules, but that doesn't always happen, especially when a nation perceives its very existence depends on acting outside international law,  Unfortunately, it happens all the time. That's reality.  Trump knows that, but his hyperbole should probably be timed down.  It can be dangerous. 

[OneMoreFarang]

2 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

If Russia were to send missiles towards the US, the shortest route for nuclear weapons would be via the North Pole and Greenland," said Marc Jacobsen, an associate professor at the Royal Danish Defence College.

"That's why the Pituffik Space Base is immensely important in defending the US."

China and Russia have begun building up their Arctic military capabilities in recent years,  theres the need for the US to further develop its presence in the Arctic to counter its rivals.

Ok, fine. Let's just accept that is as the truth (I don't know enough about the situation).

 

So, the USA would like to have more military assets in Greenland. Ok, understood. And what is the best way to do that? A message on X or Truth or whatever that the USA wants to buy Greenland? Sending his incompetent annoying son over there?

If he would be serious, then he would wait until he is president and then his government would approach their government, and they would talk about possibilities for US weapons in Greenland. And I guess they could come to an understanding - why not.

 

But Trump is different. We will buy Greenland. And/or he is willing to use the US military to get Greenland. Strange. Maybe someone should give him the book How to win Friends and influence people. I don't have much hope that he will read it, I have even less hope that he would learn from it. But we must continue to try.

[OneMoreFarang]

27 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

You people are so worked up over Trump you're not even able to make coherent points.

And do you think Trump makes coherent points? 555 

[Hummin]

18 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Sure. The rules based international order exists. It's the foundation of diplomacy and it works so long as everyone is playing the same game. It makes for predictability.  But don't think for a minute that the world always works that way.  The United Nations was founded by way of a treaty, and how is that working?  Like I said, it's nice to pretend that countries will play by the rules, but that doesn't always happen, especially when a nation perceives its very existence depends on acting outside international law,  Unfortunately, it happens all the time. That's reality.  Trump knows that, but his hyperbole should probably be timed down.  It can be dangerous. 

We both know how the game is, but, sometimes when you stab your allies in the back, do not expect us to dance with you because you think we do not have another choice. 

 

Usa wealth is because of the strong bonds between the allies, not because Usa hands out billions of free money.

 

Usa situation is purely by Americans greedy mistakes outsourcing production and services to the cheapest countries, and gives the shareholders a free ride, and punish their own people by letting themselves pay for the mistakes done by politicians and the tycons. 

 

Trump is there for him selves, for his friends, not for the voters who believes in him. 

In his eyes, those people are weak, and he can't stand weak people. 

 

Let us see if his distractions continues, or he actually getting the job done as he promised.

 

So far all he have done, is promising the greenlenders wealth and protection. 

[chercheur888]

On 1/8/2025 at 11:18 AM, chercheur888 said:

It will not be only MAGA anymore, in addition it will be:

MGGA

MPGA

MGOAGA and maybe more to come soon😂

Ok, for those who are confused, here is the clarification

MGGA = Make Greenland great again

MPGA = Make Panama great again

MGOAGA = Make Gulf of America great again

Maybe in the near future we add MCGA, for those confused, Make Canada great again, and also MUKGA might be in line.

Anyway, it's an open ended subject for Chairman Trump

[OneMoreFarang]

33 minutes ago, chercheur888 said:

Ok, for those who are confused, here is the clarification

MGGA = Make Greenland great again

MPGA = Make Panama great again

MGOAGA = Make Gulf of America great again

Maybe in the near future we add MCGA, for those confused, Make Canada great again, and also MUKGA might be in line.

Anyway, it's an open ended subject for Chairman Trump

 

I always have to laugh about that "again". Again, like when was it great the last time?

[SunnyinBangrak]

2 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

I always have to laugh about that "again". Again, like when was it great the last time?

Other than Trumps 1st term up until the gain of fauci was released, Id say you have to go back to Reagan.

 

[johnnybangkok]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

Occasionally they get it right.

 

Man of the year is all the proof I need.

Firstly, it's Person of The Year but more importantly, you do realise it's not awarded as some some sort of fanboy accolade? 

 

As the Times itself states, 'Editors are asked to choose the person or thing that had the greatest impact on the news, for good or ill — guidelines that leave them no choice but to select a newsworthy — not necessarily praiseworthy — cover subject.'   https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2019712_2019694_2019586,00.html

 

This is why they have also awarded this to Adolf Hitler (1938); Joseph Stalin (1939 and 1942); Nikita Khrushchev (1957); and Ayatollah Khomeini (1979). 

[DarthChuckler]

I doubt strumpy is playing a long game. He just mouthing off because he likes to his short game.  He's definitely looking at pillaging and plundering the coffers of the country and using these stupid ideas to change people's view. If they look over here, they don't see what he's doing. He's pretty simple. He's a little boy that everybody hated but he had money. So people kiss up to him and he hates everybody. I guess this is only game is, just trash the country over.

[frank83628]

4 hours ago, placeholder said:

Even though it was plural "you" still includes RJRS1301 since it was him that you were addressing.

Not from my p.o.v,  it encludes all "you" lot, from the screetchy pink haired libtards through to the decrepit old fogies and coffin dodgers on this site. 

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, johnnybangkok said:

Firstly, it's Person of The Year but more importantly, you do realise it's not awarded as some some sort of fanboy accolade? 

 

As the Times itself states, 'Editors are asked to choose the person or thing that had the greatest impact on the news, for good or ill — guidelines that leave them no choice but to select a newsworthy — not necessarily praiseworthy — cover subject.'   https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2019712_2019694_2019586,00.html

 

This is why they have also awarded this to Adolf Hitler (1938); Joseph Stalin (1939 and 1942); Nikita Khrushchev (1957); and Ayatollah Khomeini (1979). 

Only your species would make a difference//comment between man of the year or Person of the year.

 

If that’s all you got, that’s all you got.

 

Weak my friend, very weak.

 

Try a little harder next time.

 

 

[placeholder]

28 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Only your species would make a difference//comment between man of the year or Person of the year.

 

If that’s all you got, that’s all you got.

 

Weak my friend, very weak.

 

Try a little harder next time.

 

 

It was definitely very weak of Bangkok Johnny to provide clear and conclusive evidence that being  named Man of the Year is not necessarily the same as being acclaimed. Or maybe you're a fan of Hitler?

[farang51]

27 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Only your species would make a difference//comment between man of the year or Person of the year.

 

If that’s all you got, that’s all you got.

 

Weak my friend, very weak.

 

Try a little harder next time.

 

 

It's a shame you stopped reading after the first paragraph. Maybe you had learned something if you kept reading.

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

Not from my p.o.v,  it encludes all "you" lot, from the screetchy pink haired libtards through to the decrepit old fogies and coffin dodgers on this site. 

Your point of view takes no account of the meaning of words.

[G_Money]

10 minutes ago, placeholder said:

It was definitely very weak of Bangkok Johnny to provide clear and conclusive evidence that being  named Man of the Year is not necessarily the same as being acclaimed. Or maybe you're a fan of Hitler?

Where was Hitler mentioned in the Time Magazine article?

 

You're delusional again.

 

Seek counseling.

[G_Money]

13 minutes ago, farang51 said:

It's a shame you stopped reading after the first paragraph. Maybe you had learned something if you kept reading.

The outcome is the same.  I have nothing to learn from leftists.

They have proven their incompetence and ignorance many times over.

 

They on the other hand have so much to learn.

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Where was Hitler mentioned in the Time Magazine article?

 

You're delusional again.

 

Seek counseling.

Hitler was one of the people Time named Man of the Year.  So was Stalin. Well, given Trump's predilection for dictators, he may well consider it an honor to be ranked with them.

[G_Money]

14 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Hitler was one of the people Time named Man of the Year.  So was Stalin. Well, given Trump's predilection for dictators, he may well consider it an honor to be ranked with them.

“Hitler was one of the people Time named“

 

That's nice.  How about getting inline with this century.

 

You love living in the past, don’t you?

 

Why haven’t you mentioned January 6th yet in this thread?

 

We are all surprised!

[BusyB]

On 1/8/2025 at 3:52 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

 

It seems you are looking for logic.

Do you think Trump remembers what he said 5 min or 5 days ago? Do you think he cares and tries to be consistent?

He just shoots from the hip whatever comes up in his "mind" at that time. There is no logic and definitely no consistency. 

 

Verbal halitosis.

[radiochaser]

3 hours ago, placeholder said:

Hitler was one of the people Time named Man of the Year.  So was Stalin. Well, given Trump's predilection for dictators, he may well consider it an honor to be ranked with them.

You forgot to include biden in your honor list.