jacob29 Posted January 11 Posted January 11 5 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said: The ONLY war crimes to have been committed are those committed by Hamas . Israel hasn't committed any war crimes Would it be appropriate for Hamas to sanction any international court investigating this? 1
Popular Post Nick Carter icp Posted January 11 Popular Post Posted January 11 4 minutes ago, jacob29 said: Would it be appropriate for Hamas to sanction any international court investigating this? No, Hamas are rogues and they need to be either jailed or killed . They are dead men walking and should be treated as such 2 1
Bkk Brian Posted January 11 Posted January 11 12 minutes ago, jacob29 said: Wasn't even aware he was a Republican, thought rep meant representative. Democrats vs Republicans didn't even cross my mind. Since always, which doesn't mean every instance is deemed a war crimes. Are you suggesting there is no number of civilian collateral deaths, that could be considered excessive? Since always? Simply not true. I suggest you start here then do some research on IHL Rule 14 "Civilians cannot be made the object of an attack, but the death/injury of civilians while conducting an attack on a military objective are governed under principles such as of proportionality and military necessity and can be permissible." Back on topic, here some more reasons why the warrants are worthless, this time from UK experts. The ICC's Credibility Crisis: Why It May Be Beyond Redemption https://aseannow.com/topic/1345056-the-iccs-credibility-crisis-why-it-may-be-beyond-redemption/ 1
Bkk Brian Posted January 11 Posted January 11 8 minutes ago, jacob29 said: Would it be appropriate for Hamas to sanction any international court investigating this? Bizarre response
JonnyF Posted January 11 Posted January 11 29 minutes ago, jacob29 said: If you like thuggish threats, yes it was brilliant. Personally not the direction I like to see governments moving in. You don't take a knife to a gun fight. It's about time Western governments took the gloves off. In order to achieve this, weak pearl clutching pandering Liberal/progressive governments will need to be removed. With the exception of the UK that seems to be happening. Better late than never. 1 1
Popular Post Patong2021 Posted January 11 Popular Post Posted January 11 13 hours ago, TigerandDog said: It appears that everyone whose comments are in support of this ridiculous legislation have little or no knowledge of how this originally started. Israel, which did not exist as a country pre WW2 was created by the UN and annexed from Palestine. The real terrorists in this ongoing saga are Israel, and especially Netanyahu. First they annexed the Golan Heights from Syria, then they annexed the West Bank & Gaza from Palestine. The PLO, Hamas etc, whilst internationally labelled as terrorists, are doing nothing different to what Ukraine is currently doing with Russia. Defending their homeland from a terrorist govt continually expanding, and essentially invading, in the past Syria and currently Palestine. under the pretext of their national security. I'm not a supporter of the methods used by Hamas, BUT Netanyahu has ALWAYS been the instigator in these incursions into Palestinian territory. Netanyahu is the real terrorist here and he should be arrested on site. This only thing this stupid piece of US legislation does is show the USA's support for a terrorist Prime Minister. Israel most certainly existed as a nation long before WWII. It was called the Kingdom of Israel. This is documented and an historical fact. Would you deny the existence of the Duchys and Principalities of Europe? They went on to become countries known today as Italy, France, Germany etc. In case you missed it, there was something called the Ottoman Empire. It had control over much of the region called the Middle East for centuries. Israel existed as a part of the Ottoman Empire and was administered as a department of Damascus. There was no Lebanon, no Jordan, no Saudia Arabia and the borders of Assyria, Iraq/Babylonia, Persia/Iran were not defined. Nor was there any semblance of a place called Palestine as it is known today. The North African Arab nations of today were nothing more than feuding tribal and clan differentiations. You deny the existence of modern Israel, and yet, you ignore the fact, that Israel's modern origins also gave rise to Jordan, Lebanon, the establishment of the Syrian and Iraqi borders, and the creation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. You wish to deny the existence and legitimacy of Israel. Fine. Then at least be consistent and deny the right to exist of much of the current Arab nations. The Arabs could have lived in peace with Israel, but they attacked Israel in 1948 with the stated desire to wipe it out. The arab leadership has been promising to do this since 1948 as it provides an easy distraction from the screwed up mismanaged corrupt dictatorships that they are. 2 1 1
Dave0206 Posted January 11 Posted January 11 3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said: Those iron dome rockets aren't cheap , about $100 000 per rocket . It would be a good idea to stop Iran and Hamas and the Hothis from firing rockets at Israel Well as you say it's a rich country with a gdp of 500 billion so perhaps instead of extending its borders can perhaps think about another avenue for peace or build away and pay the 100.000 per rocket
Nick Carter icp Posted January 11 Posted January 11 6 minutes ago, Dave0206 said: Well as you say it's a rich country with a gdp of 500 billion so perhaps instead of extending its borders can perhaps think about another avenue for peace or build away and pay the 100.000 per rocket Well, what other way to peace would that be ? Have you got a solution to the problem ? 1
Dave0206 Posted January 11 Posted January 11 Well unless you kill everyone survivors who lose homes and loved ones will not be hard to convert to hamas isis or any other factions that give them a opportunity to strike back against isreal and the west who only see 1 side .Easy to place the blame 100% on hamas they played right into his hands now he and his war cabinet are indiscriminately bombing the hell out of everyone. 1 2
Popular Post jacob29 Posted January 11 Popular Post Posted January 11 2 hours ago, Bkk Brian said: under principles such as of proportionality and military necessity and can be permissible." The proportionality principle is implied in my response, why do you think I asked if there any level of casualties that are unacceptable. 2 hours ago, Bkk Brian said: The ICC's Credibility Crisis: Why It May Be Beyond Redemption https://aseannow.com/topic/1345056-the-iccs-credibility-crisis-why-it-may-be-beyond-redemption/ Once again, I'm talking about the mafia like statement coming from the rep - which ignores the matter of credibly, instead threatening anyone who dares investigate the US or allies. He did not make it conditional on non-credible charges, or hint that if they were credible then there wouldn't be an issue. 1 2
Geir Rasch Posted January 11 Posted January 11 12 hours ago, Bkk Brian said: Your are forgetting that Hamas are the ones responsible for nearly all the deaths, you are forgetting Hamas uses the Gazan civilians as human shields and deliberate sacrifice. Do you mean that makes it right for Israel to kill innocent people? 2
Nick Carter icp Posted January 11 Posted January 11 59 minutes ago, Geir Rasch said: Do you mean that makes it right for Israel to kill innocent people? Innocent people get killed in all wars
Nick Carter icp Posted January 11 Posted January 11 2 hours ago, Dave0206 said: Well unless you kill everyone survivors who lose homes and loved ones will not be hard to convert to hamas isis or any other factions that give them a opportunity to strike back against isreal and the west who only see 1 side .Easy to place the blame 100% on hamas they played right into his hands now he and his war cabinet are indiscriminately bombing the hell out of everyone. Its very easy to blame Hamas , because they started the war by attacking Israel , killing innocent woman and children , taking hostages and many other atrocities . Likewise, Hamas attacking Israel resulted in Israel striking back and going hardline , works both ways
Dave0206 Posted January 11 Posted January 11 2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said: Its very easy to blame Hamas , because they started the war by attacking Israel , killing innocent woman and children , taking hostages and many other atrocities . Likewise, Hamas attacking Israel resulted in Israel striking back and going hardline , works both ways And the finish is when?
Popular Post Nick Carter icp Posted January 11 Popular Post Posted January 11 15 minutes ago, Dave0206 said: And the finish is when? When Palestinians accept Israel's right to exist and they stop waging war against Israel . When Palestinians want to live in peace , that's when the conflict will end 2 1
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Posted January 12 7 hours ago, jacob29 said: The proportionality principle is implied in my response, why do you think I asked if there any level of casualties that are unacceptable. Once again, I'm talking about the mafia like statement coming from the rep - which ignores the matter of credibly, instead threatening anyone who dares investigate the US or allies. He did not make it conditional on non-credible charges, or hint that if they were credible then there wouldn't be an issue. Can you stop snipping my quotes out of context. You clearly contradicted your self and I addressed that: Back on topic and your rage at the US statement to the ICC, I feel for you. the utter disgust that they should sound like the mafia especially when there are US citizens being held hostage, never mind eh. Have you read some of the statements coming from the terrorists? 1
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Posted January 12 6 hours ago, Geir Rasch said: Do you mean that makes it right for Israel to kill innocent people? Its urban warfare, since when have civilians been spared the horrible consequences of that? Especially when the terrorists have embedded themselves directly within the local population to use them as human shields, which is a war crime.
stevenl Posted January 12 Posted January 12 8 hours ago, Dave0206 said: And the finish is when? The way Israel is handling things at the moment, no finish in 100 years 1 1
Nick Carter icp Posted January 12 Posted January 12 12 minutes ago, stevenl said: The way Israel is handling things at the moment, no finish in 100 years There will only be peace when Hamas is removed from the equation . Israel need to go into Gaza and set up deradicalization camps and bring up the next Palestinian generation NOT hating Israel . Remove the Hamas ideology from the Strip
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Posted January 12 17 minutes ago, stevenl said: The way Israel is handling things at the moment, no finish in 100 years Why is Hamas going to capture more baby hostages?
jacob29 Posted January 12 Posted January 12 5 hours ago, Bkk Brian said: You clearly contradicted your self and I addressed that: I clarified in the same sentence, that 'since always' does not mean 'in every instance'. Please finish reading the sentences you're replying to. 5 hours ago, Bkk Brian said: the utter disgust that they should sound like the mafia especially when there are US citizens being held hostage, never mind eh. Have you read some of the statements coming from the terrorists? Once again, you're implying that when dealing with terrorists, there should be no restrictions - that human rights are no longer applicable. Xinjiang investigation in China? That's an anti terrorism campaign, so China should sanction any party calling for investigation. That's your logic. That's the precedent being set, and if the US wants to lead by example, this is not the example to be setting.
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Posted January 12 1 minute ago, jacob29 said: I clarified in the same sentence, that 'since always' does not mean 'in every instance'. Please finish reading the sentences you're replying to. Once again, you're implying that when dealing with terrorists, there should be no restrictions - that human rights are no longer applicable. Xinjiang investigation in China? That's an anti terrorism campaign, so China should sanction any party calling for investigation. That's your logic. That's the precedent being set, and if the US wants to lead by example, this is not the example to be setting. I clarified in the same sentence, that 'since always' does not mean 'in every instance'. Please finish reading the sentences you're replying to. No you contradicted yourself....lol Don't try and make up what I imply. Its quite clear for those with honesty and logic
jacob29 Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Just now, Bkk Brian said: No you contradicted yourself....lol I pre-empted your low effort reply by adding that clarification, as I figured you would go with that distortion of what I said.
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, jacob29 said: I pre-empted your low effort reply by adding that clarification, as I figured you would go with that distortion of what I said. Yes of course you did Jacob................ Have you read the charges yet?
jacob29 Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Just now, Bkk Brian said: Have you read the charges yet? Irrelevant, as I'm not arguing that US should accept whatever claims are made. I have no problem with the US rejecting their findings or jurisdiction and going about their business. Threatening investigating parties with sanctions for merely daring to investigate, is the problem here. So please, enough with the red herrings. 1 1
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Just now, jacob29 said: Irrelevant, as I'm not arguing that US should accept whatever claims are made. I have no problem with the US rejecting their findings or jurisdiction and going about their business. Threatening investigating parties with sanctions for merely daring to investigate, is the problem here. So please, enough with the red herrings. Got it, so you haven't.........jeez
Patong2021 Posted January 12 Posted January 12 12 hours ago, Geir Rasch said: Do you mean that makes it right for Israel to kill innocent people? Identify who is innocent. Serious request. The reality is that Hamas uses children in its war. They are used as couriers, logistics helpers, observers, and fighters. Typically, the boy is allowed to become a fighter once he can grow hair in his armpit. Militant fighters are intentionally housed in danger zones to serve as human shields. Missile and rocket launch sites are fired from "schools" and medical facilities as well as residential buildings. Munitions depots are maintained in these areas and hospitals are used for command and control sites. The aforementioned has been documented. How then would you fight a war against such an entity that intentionally puts people in harm's way and who hides behind such people with the goal of creating martyrs to manipulate western sentiment. The other muslim nations know what is being done because they have done it themselves in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya and Chad. Even after Israel cleared several hospitals, Hamas moved its rocket launch sites back into them. How then do you propose that Israel defend itself from the rocket launches from Gaza from the dozen or more factions? Hamas is the principal enemy, but Islamic Jihad and the Marxist Alliance and others are all engaged in the war. They are sworn to the destruction of israel and refuse to enter into a peace arrangement.
Social Media Posted January 12 Author Posted January 12 A few bickering and trolling posts along with replies have been removed.
Geir Rasch Posted January 12 Posted January 12 13 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said: Its very easy to blame Hamas , because they started the war by attacking Israel , killing innocent woman and children , taking hostages and many other atrocities . Likewise, Hamas attacking Israel resulted in Israel striking back and going hardline , works both ways Hamas is called terrorists for what they have done. So when Israel do the same they too should be called terrorists. Agree? 1 1
Geir Rasch Posted January 12 Posted January 12 7 hours ago, Bkk Brian said: Its urban warfare, since when have civilians been spared the horrible consequences of that? Especially when the terrorists have embedded themselves directly within the local population to use them as human shields, which is a war crime. Who is the terrorists? When they both do the same: killing innocent people, they are both terrorists. It is sad that usa support terrorists. Not all israeli are terrorists, only those who support Netanyahus terror acts.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now