Jump to content

Starmer Faces Rising Pressure as Labour MPs Demand Grooming Gangs Inquiry


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Labour leader Keir Starmer is facing mounting pressure to initiate a national inquiry into grooming gangs, following calls from two Labour MPs in two days. Rotherham MP Sarah Champion, known for her decade-long advocacy on abuse issues, has joined the chorus, stating that only a comprehensive investigation into the failures of authorities will restore public faith in the safeguarding systems.

 

Champion's call for action was echoed by Rochdale MP Paul Waugh, who expressed conditional support for an inquiry, emphasizing the importance of victim support and the need to avoid disrupting ongoing police investigations. Their statements have reignited a debate that gained traction last week when billionaire and Donald Trump ally Elon Musk commented on the issue, praising the MPs on his platform, X.

 

Champion, whose constituency has been at the center of grooming gang scandals, declared that child sexual abuse is "endemic" in the UK and must be recognized as a national priority. She highlighted the necessity of understanding the nature of the crime and the systemic failures to protect children, stressing that public trust hinges on addressing these issues comprehensively.

 

Waugh, in an interview with BBC Politics North West, noted his openness to an inquiry but stressed the need for careful consideration of victims' perspectives and the potential trauma they might endure by recounting their experiences repeatedly. He also warned against any inquiry that might interfere with live investigations.

 

The push for an inquiry gained further momentum over the weekend when Labour MP Dan Carden became the first from his party to advocate openly for such a probe. Carden, representing Liverpool, urged Starmer to leverage the full power of the state to ensure justice for the victims, emphasizing the public’s compassion and demand for accountability.

 

Downing Street acknowledged the significance of Champion's stance, given her extensive background in child protection issues. However, the government reiterated its focus on implementing the recommendations from a 2022 report on child sexual abuse rather than launching a new inquiry. It maintained that any action would be guided by the voices of victims and survivors.

 

As the debate intensifies, Starmer faces a critical decision on whether to heed the growing calls within his party and the public for a new inquiry, balancing the need for justice with the sensitivity of ongoing investigations and the impact on victims.

 

Based on a report by The Independent 2024-01-15

 

Related Topics:

The Silenced Truth: How Political Correctness Delayed Justice for Grooming Victims

Britons Overwhelmingly Support a New Grooming Gang Inquiry

Romanian Grooming Gang Convicted of Sexually Exploiting Women in Dundee

 Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Says Whistleblower’s Aide

Grooming Networks Persist in Oxford, Warns Former Investigator

Convicted Rochdale Grooming Gang Leader Still in the Town & not Deported

Starmer Condemns 'Lies and Misinformation' Over Child Sexual Abuse

UK Ex-MP Claims Grooming Gang Ethnicity Was Suppressed to Protect Votes

Elon Musk Advocates for Tommy Robinson’s Release Amid Criticism of UK Leadership

Kemi Badenoch Urges National Inquiry into UK Grooming Scandal

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

image.png

Posted

Why are people now saying "the state" must get involved but kept quiet for 14 years by saying it was up to local authorities?

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Seppius said:

Oddly, you still seem to stick up for Starmer. Do you think he is doing a good job?

 

 

I think he’s done a great job securing a Labour victory in the election,

 

Some are a bit ‘salty’ about that.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 6
Posted
3 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

What people want to see is those in authority who deliberately ignored the disgusting behaviour of the rape gangs be identified, and then face justice.

 

 

There’s an example of seemingly knowing the outcome of a second inquiry.

Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There’s an example of seemingly knowing the outcome of a second inquiry.

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There’s an example of seemingly knowing the outcome of a second inquiry.

This doesn't make sense. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

If you assert there are those who need to face justice then it seems you know this to be the case, it’s then a matter for the police. 

Oh dear. Obtuse is the word that comes to mind. Move on...

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

If you assert there are those who need to face justice then it seems you know this to be the case, it’s then a matter for the police. 

It's the police themselves who need to face justice for their cover-up. Smarten up man, or find something else to do.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...