Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It is called climate change rather than global warming for a reason. the extra heat energy can cause normal weather events to be more severe. The jet stream now ventures further south, which can pull down the polar vortex over the United states, also more storms floods, droughts, forest fires.

 

The day After tomorrow seemed to far exaggerated when it came out. Current conditions make me think now not so much!

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Confuscious said:

Mark Zucker's yacht emits more CO2 than a car would emit in a lifetime.
While we all try to reduce the CO2 emission, hundreds of politiians and rich people fly around in private jets that emit more CO2 than a whole city.
While we all try to reduce the CO2 emission, Quatar is burning thousand of tires in the desert.
The list is endless.

Link to the Qatar tyre burning please.

Posted
22 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

Climate change deniers 1990 said that Global warming would not happen.

Climate change deniers in 2020 admit the world is warming but it is not because of the carbon being released by human activities.

Climate change deniers in 2025 make claims that climate scientists never said.

 

Climate scientists told us in the 1980s that if we did not reduce the amount of carbon we released into the air that the temperatures would rise.

 

The past eight years were the warmest on record globally, fueled by ever-rising greenhouse gas concentrations and accumulated heat, according to six leading international temperature datasets consolidated by the World Meteorological Organization.

 

Climate deniers are mostly old people who haven’t had any schooling for decades.

 

when it comes to science it makes sense to listen to scientists, not politicians or conspiracy theorists on the internet.

 

 

 


100% 

Check out the award winning film my good friend Craig made about the World's glaciers.

https://thelastglaciers.com/

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Freddy42OZ said:


100% 

Check out the award winning film my good friend Craig made about the World's glaciers.

https://thelastglaciers.com/

 

https://theweek.com/articles/476380/global-warming-mystery-why-are-some-glaciers-growing

https://eos.org/science-updates/new-perspectives-on-the-enigma-of-expanding-antarctic-sea-ice

 

Some areas have seen glaciers growing again, mostly eastern Antarctica, Southern Patagonia, Karakoram, North-west Greenland, (even mt.St.Helens volcano has now a glacier in its crater.

 

https://www.wgbh.org/tv-shows/overview/why-earths-newest-glacier-is-inside-an-active-volcano-me1kbb

 

https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/FutureEO/CryoSat/Arctic_sea_ice_up_from_record_low

 

In the last decade navigators sailing through the northwest passage have seen an increase of sea ice making the “window” for a safe passage shorter.
 

So never say never….

Posted
9 minutes ago, Watawattana said:

Kuwait.  Literally the biggest 💩hole I've ever been to in the world.  The rest of the ME is amazing in comparison.


I do agree with you about Kuwait. I almost sided with the Palestinian residents who have “built” Kuwait after WW2 and welcomed the Iraqi troops.

After Desert Storm the Kuwaitis were supposed to give these Palestinians citizenship and right to vote.

It never happened. So these people are denied any legal residency.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

sea ice in the Arctic is decreasing. Their may be transient increases in some areas but it is going down.

 

https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today

 

Quote

 Average Arctic sea ice extent for December was the lowest in the satellite record, 

Glaciers are loosing mass. A few might grow, due to increased snowfall, but most do not.

 

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-mountain-glaciers

 

Nid noi is cherry picking.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

The only ones destroying and creating the problems, are humans.

For over 50 years there is a coal mine burning in USA , Pennsylvania.

 

Luckily we had some brave men who killed the fires in Kuwait.

Respect for them. As some stupid with a flare gun, burnt the place to the ground, to speak in Deep Purple style.

 

We are developing "space tourism" , good idea? Neeeh

 

Many forests disappear, too many people on earth and that is a main point. Too many people, almost 9 billion.

Cut down in that number or are we doing now so by virusses?

 

Or the mighty leaders start wars and destruction.

Vietnam, Syria, Israel, Gaza, Russia, Afghanistan and many more.

Hooray mankind, we can and will destroy all

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I don't know if this incident is a sure sign that global warming will end the world, but the continuing human destruction of the Earth's environment will eventually result in the extinction of humans and many other species. We are now "over the cliff" on that.

Good grief! The hysteria is astounding! Stop staring down that empty void, it’s narrowing your perception.

  • Sad 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, novacova said:

Good grief! The hysteria is astounding! Stop staring down that empty void, it’s narrowing your perception.

My perception is narrowed because it is focused on the truth. Any perception that humans benefit this planet or the universe and should be sustained is just a delusion. We are like a cancer on this planet, and any attempts to spread humans to other planets until we learn to live both socially and environmentally compatible on this one should not be called "colonizing" but "metastasizing." 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 1/24/2025 at 2:25 PM, MalcolmB said:

Gore is an American politician 

like I said, listen to the scientists, not politicians 

You DO listen to the politicians, because the scientists you listen to, listen to the politicians. In particular, the left-wing biased-driven politicians committed to the socialist/communist agenda, with "climate change" being a critical part of that agenda.

 

A true scientist is unbiased and will look at ALL sides and aspects related to the issue. There is enough, if not overwhelming, statistics and evidence against the notion of climate change, making it impossible to have such a one-sided view as the liberals clearly have whenever it comes to forwarding their Marxist agenda.

 

As in most situations, common sense ought to prevail.

 

Funny, when liberals complain about equity and inclusion, they never bring up how unfair it is that others are capable of having common sense and they just don't have any.

Posted
3 hours ago, DustyShoes said:

You DO listen to the politicians, because the scientists you listen to, listen to the politicians. In particular, the left-wing biased-driven politicians committed to the socialist/communist agenda, with "climate change" being a critical part of that agenda.

 

A true scientist is unbiased and will look at ALL sides and aspects related to the issue. There is enough, if not overwhelming, statistics and evidence against the notion of climate change, making it impossible to have such a one-sided view as the liberals clearly have whenever it comes to forwarding their Marxist agenda.

 

As in most situations, common sense ought to prevail.

 

Funny, when liberals complain about equity and inclusion, they never bring up how unfair it is that others are capable of having common sense and they just don't have any.

It is pretty simple formula I use.

 

30 years ago scientists said that ifwe don’t stop with all the carbon that the temperatures would rise.

 

And that is exactly what has happened. The thermometer doesn’t lie.

 

It has nothing to do with left versus right politics apart from big polluting businesses sponsor political parties to keep them in line.

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/26/2025 at 8:21 AM, MalcolmB said:

It is pretty simple formula I use.

 

30 years ago scientists said that ifwe don’t stop with all the carbon that the temperatures would rise.

 

And that is exactly what has happened. The thermometer doesn’t lie.

 

It has nothing to do with left versus right politics apart from big polluting businesses sponsor political parties to keep them in line.

 

 

 

You formula is not fit for purpose & actually you have it backwards. Higher temps are good for most of the globe.

 

Just Earth cycles doing what it always has,  with or without humans. Warm periods are a net gain while cold periods are what kills life, just as more people die from cold every year than heat. 

 

Why do you think the planet was so green with massive fauna and animal life for millions of years ?  Higher carbon dioxide ppm for nearly all that time. 

 

Carbon dioxide = more life not less and so do rising temps. Even the most basic cannabis grower knows that. 

 

Dont fuss over Carbon footprint its a scam, one decent volcanic eruption spews more than human activity does in years and we get one every few years of magnitude and dozens of others smaller every year but not insignificant,all spewing out C02.  When a huge Volcanic eruption occurs, typically every few hundred years it can create almost mini ice age. See the dark ages period for temps in Europe 200 - 700 or look up the little iceage in the 1600s.. disastrous as temps plunged and nothing to do with humanity. 

 

Its the cold periods you need to be concerned with not warming and the possible and ever more likely  pole shift.  Yes its way overdue and the trajectory  has been progressing for many decades in the same direction. 

 

Once comfortably located in northern Canada, the pole kicked into high gear in the late 20th century, making its way across the Arctic Ocean by the 1990s.

From there, the pace has increased progressively , peaking at an astonishing 55 kilometers per year during the 2010s.

Presently, it’s hurtling at a slightly reduced but still impressive speed of 25 kilometers per year towards Siberia.

 

https://www.earth.com/news/magnetic-north-pole-is-moving-faster-than-ever-as-it-races-toward-russia/

 

Humanity has no control over such things & if it continues at the rate and current  trajectory the tipping point will be reached sometime  around the 2040s...  What that might mean can only be guessed at, but nothing good most likely. Oh well thats life. 

 

Do wider research and youll realise you have been gaslit. 

 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...