Jump to content

Migrants in UK: The Challenge of Integration


Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

In respect of the criticism of expatriates in Thailand, and our "integration" into Thai society: we do not expect and demand that the indigenous society allow us to practice religious or society customs which may be abhorrent to them, do not offer or actually commit violence to further what we see as our distinct legal and social systems, and do not expect to be funded by the society to which we have come to live.

 

So we do not demand that Thai religious holidays be not celebrated. If (for reasons of religious custom) some of us don't eat meat on Fridays we don't object to others eating meat around us. If ( for reasons I don't begin to understand) some of us don't drink alcohol we don't demand that it be banned.

 

That is rather the difference between the western expatriate community in Thailand and large swathes of the Muslim immigrant community in Europe.

‘Largest swathes’

 

Sounds like one of those ‘broad generalizations’.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

The UK was a multiracial society, very successfully, from the 1950’s through to the 1990’s with beneficial integration from immigrants of different races and cultures. The real problem started when immigrants that are adherents to Islam started arriving, with their refusal to even attempt to integrate, but rather a dictum to start parallel societies within the UK, which they have done.

 

There are already 85, and counting, known Sharia councils in the UK, and every one of them promote hate preaching, honour killings, the subjugation of women, the persecution of gays, and the female genital mutilation of children. They also promote middle aged uncles marrying (several) of their prepubescent nieces; this is hugely popular with the menfolk, not so much with the schoolgirls.

 

It is the insular nature of these Sharia councils within communities that has fostered, enabled, and protected the myriad muslim rape gangs; making integration impossible for most of them, because they have been indoctrinated into believing that it is wrong to integrate with infidels; whilst a few well educated muslims have integrated to an extent, they have moved away from the vicelike  grip of their original communities.

 

Whilst the left wing virtue signallers (including several of the usual suspects on here) try to shut down any conversation about it, by screaming Islamophobe, racist, bigot, or xenophobe, the UK’s march towards an Islamic state, or a civil war, gathers a momentum that it appears cannot be reversed

 

…. Private Frazer was right on the money ¯\_()_/¯

 

 

 

 

No need to ‘scream’ anything.

 

A quiet ‘know thyself’ suffices.

  • Confused 3
Posted
13 minutes ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

 

Most are on a Non-Immigrant visa.

 

Why have to integrate when you are not an immigrant?

Because you live here.

Love it, or leave it.

  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

The consequence being they are not legally recognized in the UK and for disputes have to go to a Sharia court where everything is stacked against the woman. 

Sounds good to me, better than UK law when everything is stacked against the father. 
Smart men those muslim men, not being pegged by feminists.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

B/S, advocating for less women's rights under Sharia Law is shameful

Well that is very feminist of you. 
You are ok when the wife runs of with a new bloke, then takes the house and child custody and then calls the police if he complains and then can’t go within a km of his children.

Nice cat.

  • Confused 2
Posted
3 hours ago, loong said:

Who is St Andrews?

St Andrew is the patron saint of Scotland, but I have never heard of St Andrews.

Patron saint of Scottish students?? 🙂

Posted
6 hours ago, Social Media said:

a sexagenarian was arrested for allegedly using wigs and disguises to take British citizenship tests on behalf of over a dozen applicants. This incident suggests that some individuals are so determined to settle in Britain that they are willing to bypass the very requirements meant to ensure their integration.

 

Authorities are giving the test to the wrong people. It's the native British who need to be tested to see whether they are worthy and able to live in the same nation as the migrants.

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, John Drake said:

 

Authorities are giving the test to the wrong people. It's the native British who need to be tested to see whether they are worthy and able to live in the same nation as the migrants.

 

We formed your country, and still run it by proxy through our Freemasonic networks, so maybe we are not as dumb as you believe? 😉

  • Haha 2
Posted
37 minutes ago, jippytum said:

would you prefere our woman to wear Burkas thr preferred attire for females. 

A large percentage are so ugly it would be an improvement. 
I think my it would increase the odds of my sister finding a man.

  • Sad 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

It never hurts to be nice to people.

Especially those who are finding their feet in a new country.

 

Shouldn't make them too comfortable as they may need to leave at any moment.

 

Just as the Thais do, and their way is the right way. 

 

Thailand a homeland for the Thais.

 

Britain a homeland for the British.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

A large percentage are so ugly it would be an improvement. 
I think my it would increase the odds of my sister finding a man.

So you are the handsome one in your family

  • Haha 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

I didn't say "largest swathes", I said "large swathes". There is a difference.

 

Far be it from me, as a retired English teacher, to explain the difference between an adjective, it's comparative and it's superlative; sufficient to say that they do make a considerable difference to meanings.

 

Ask your "handlers", if they have a quiet few minutes they may explain it to you!

Ah your pathetic accusation of ‘handlers’ again.

 

Retired English teacher.

 

Let me enjoy that for a moment.

 

 

  • Confused 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...