Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There has always been discretion in negotiations for traffic fines, it was called "what's in it for me?" 

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

they had also unlawfully imposed fixed fine rates, removing police discretion in assessing penalties

 

So after this, back to setting fines on the roadside based on how much resides in your wallet?

 

Oh, this will end well.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Another action to make the roads safer surely with all the holidays and the rush hours... Solution is easy enforce the law and rise the fines as the fines and punishment are too low... Than a court can decide if it is a correct fine or not

Posted

Roadside payments have been in place for decades if not longer.. as for challenging the amount, that has always been negotiable, depending on the infringement

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

We're talking about a society that praises traffic police for making children riding four-up on a scooter without helmets do squats as punishment before being sent on their way

Don't forget the guy who was allowed to proceed with a saucepan or bucket on his head as a crash helmet

  • Haha 2
Posted

I find it interesting that these regulations came in just around the time the law was changed regarding cannabis. It occured to the cynic in me that the loss of side revenue from busting people for cannabis related offences would be offset by the increase in side  revenue from traffic related offences. But then I thought surely not; this would require the coordination of systematic, endemic corruption from the bottom to the top - unthinkable. It must just be a coincidence these traffic laws were so hastily pushed through at that time and as a result were found to be unlawful at a later date.

Posted
16 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

police had misled motorists into believing they had no right to dispute their tickets.

 

The court found this practice to be in violation of Section 29 of the constitution, which guarantees that all accused individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

It is the verbal statements made to motorists that's unlawful. The fines are legal. Two separate actions.

Fined motorists should have the right to challenge the police statements as being unlawful and challenge the fine, as such the alleged fine should deferred to adjudication. But a traffic ticket should be issued and acknowledged by the driver's signature. Whether the police choose to enforce the fine I court is another matter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...