Jump to content

USAID: The Big Exposure Reveals...


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, candide said:

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆

 

And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Posted
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆

 

And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, candide said:

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆

 

And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Posted
Just now, Yellowtail said:

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆

 

And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆

 

Should I add that your are trolling? 🤣

Posted
Just now, candide said:

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆

 

And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆

 

Should I add that your are trolling? 🤣

"CIA now backs lab leak theory to explain origins of Covid-19"

CIA now backs lab leak theory to explain origins of Covid-19 | Health | The Guardian

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

"CIA now backs lab leak theory to explain origins of Covid-19"

CIA now backs lab leak theory to explain origins of Covid-19 | Health | The Guardian

Stop pretending that you did not understand the point I was addressing! 

 

Where is it written in this article that the Covid 19 virus originates from the specific viruses used in the eco health program? 😆

 

The point I was precisely addressing is that the viruses used in the eco-health program cannot be the progenitors of the Covid-19 virus, 😆

 

I did not address the lab leak theory in general, which is neither proven nor disproved. It may be that the Covid19 was leaked (or not) but it cannot originate from the viruses used in the eco health program.

 

Feel free to post your scientific evidence that the Covid 19 virus originates from the specific viruses usec in the eco health program! I'm not holding my breath again! 🤣

Posted
Just now, candide said:

Stop pretending that you did not understand the point I was addressing! 

 

Where is it written in this article that the Covid 19 virus originates from the specific viruses used in the eco health program? 😆

 

The point I was precisely addressing is that the viruses used in the eco-health program cannot be the progenitors of the Covid-19 virus, 😆

 

I did not address the lab leak theory in general, which is neither proven nor disproved. It may be that the Covid19 was leaked (or not) but it cannot originate from the viruses used in the eco health program.

 

Feel free to post your scientific evidence that the Covid 19 virus originates from the specific viruses usec in the eco health program! I'm not holding my breath again! 🤣

Stop pretending that you did not understand the point I was addressing! 

Posted 15 minutes ago

  17 minutes ago, candide said:

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆

 

And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Posted
Just now, Yellowtail said:

Stop pretending that you did not understand the point I was addressing! 

Posted 15 minutes ago

  17 minutes ago, candide said:

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆

 

And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆

Like I said, you still believe: 

The FBI did not know the laptop was authentic prior to the election. 
The Steele dossier was real, and Russian collusion was a hoax. 
Covid came from the wet market.
Harris got to be VP on her merit.
Joe Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business. 
Joe Biden did not benefit form Hunter's business.

USAID is feeding starving children around the world. 

Men can women. 

Women can be men. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆

And you are still posting lame deflections! 😆

Posted
Just now, candide said:

You still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆

And you are still posting lame deflections! 😆

I never made that claim. 😆😆😆

 

All you do is troll and deflect. 

 

Did covid come from the lab or the wet market? 

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I never made that claim. 😆😆😆

 

All you do is troll and deflect. 

 

Did covid come from the lab or the wet market? 

 

 

Then you are incoherent because you replied to a discussion which was exactly about the fact that the Covid-19 virus cannot originate from the viruses used in the eco-health program.

 

The alternative explanation being that you were intentionally deflecting from the particular issue I was addressing. :smile:

Posted
3 minutes ago, candide said:

Then you are incoherent because you replied to a discussion which was exactly about the fact that the Covid-19 virus cannot originate from the viruses used in the eco-health program.

 

The alternative explanation being that you were intentionally deflecting from the particular issue I was addressing. :smile:

Again, I never made the claim. 

 

All you do is troll and deflect. 

 

Did covid come from the lab or the wet market? 

 

Why is it impossible for you to answer? 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Again, I never made the claim. 

 

All you do is troll and deflect. 

 

Did covid come from the lab or the wet market? 

 

Why is it impossible for you to answer? 

It's not what I was discussing, but, as I wrote just before, the lab leak theory has neither been proven nor disproved.

 

In the article you linked yourself, it is mentioned:

"While the origin of the virus remains unknown, scientists think the most likely hypothesis is that it circulated in bats, like many coronaviruses, before infecting another species, probably racoon dogs, civet cats or bamboo rats. In turn, the infection spread to humans handling or butchering those animals at a market in Wuhan, where the first human cases appeared in late November 2019".

 

Personally, I would thinks the odds are around 70% zoonotic origin vs 30% lab leak origin. Of course that's a subjective probability.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, candide said:

Personally, I would thinks the odds are around 70% zoonotic origin vs 30% lab leak origin. Of course that's a subjective probability.

 

Good thing you've been wrong about a lot of things you thought you knew. 

  • Love It 1
Posted
Just now, blaze master said:

 

Good thing you've been wrong about a lot of things you thought you knew. 

Good thing you are only making an empty comment.

Posted
Just now, candide said:

Good thing you are only making an empty comment.

 

Really ? 

 

So you weren't a laptop denier ? You weren't a Russian collusion guy ? You weren't a Biden is mentally great guy ? You weren't a kamala gonna mop Trump guy? 

 

Sure you were.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, blaze master said:

 

Really ? 

 

So you weren't a laptop denier ? You weren't a Russian collusion guy ? You weren't a Biden is mentally great guy ? You weren't a kamala gonna mop Trump guy? 

 

Sure you were.

I'm not a fact denier. I did not deny the laptop story after it had been assessed by reliable sources. I am a Russian interference guy. I am a Trump is mentally worse than Biden guy. I did initially think that Kamala would mop Trump, until a few weeks before the election and polls started to show a Trump win.

Happy?

Which has nothing to do with the lab leak theory. Currently facts are:

"While the origin of the virus remains unknown, scientists think the most likely hypothesis is that it circulated in bats, like many coronaviruses, before infecting another species, probably racoon dogs, civet cats or bamboo rats. In turn, the infection spread to humans handling or butchering those animals at a market in Wuhan, where the first human cases appeared in late November 2019". 

 

Of course, if new facts emerge, I would alter my subjective probability assessment, in one direction or the other.

 

I also wasn't a Trump will bring down price of food immediately guy, a Trump will get a peace deal even before being inaugurated guy, a Crowdstrike is an Ukrainian company guy, a Covid-19 is a Dem hoax guy, a Covid 19 is just a flu guy, a FD-1023 guy, a Durham investigation guy, a Kraken guy, a Trump won the election guy, a Pizzagate guy,etc...

Just to name a few! 🙂

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, candide said:

I'm not a fact denier. I did not deny the laptop story after it had been assessed by reliable sources. I am a Russian interference guy. I am a Trump is mentally worse than Biden guy. I did initially think that Kamala would mop Trump, until a few weeks before the election and polls started to show a Trump win.

Happy?

Which has nothing to do with the lab leak theory. Currently facts are:

"While the origin of the virus remains unknown, scientists think the most likely hypothesis is that it circulated in bats, like many coronaviruses, before infecting another species, probably racoon dogs, civet cats or bamboo rats. In turn, the infection spread to humans handling or butchering those animals at a market in Wuhan, where the first human cases appeared in late November 2019". 

 

Of course, if new facts emerge, I would alter my subjective probability assessment, in one direction or the other.

 

I also wasn't a Trump will bring down price of food immediately guy, a Trump will get a peace deal even before being inaugurated guy, a Crowdstrike is an Ukrainian company guy, a Covid-19 is a Dem hoax guy, a Covid 19 is just a flu guy, a FD-1023 guy, a Durham investigation guy, a Kraken guy, a Trump won the election guy, a Pizzagate guy,etc...

Just to name a few! 🙂

 

 

Posters please take note on how to not admit you were wrong. 

 

There is no shame in admitting you messed up. We all do it. Even I have had a moment or 2. But the issue is when you keep denying and deflecting. 

 

Then you go on an unhinged rant frothing about Trump.

 

The s runs deep within you. I feel sorry for people like you so wound up in their own ideology. 

Posted
36 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

Posters please take note on how to not admit you were wrong. 

 

There is no shame in admitting you messed up. We all do it. Even I have had a moment or 2. But the issue is when you keep denying and deflecting. 

 

Then you go on an unhinged rant frothing about Trump.

 

The s runs deep within you. I feel sorry for people like you so wound up in their own ideology. 

I replied precisely about what I believed. When and about what. The "when" is important as facts come up at different times. Ex Kamala, the poll survey results changed over time, asnd my "belief" followed.

 

And your question has nothing to do with what I was discussing before you invited yourself (you are still welcome)

 

And I have also proven that I have been right on plenty other occasions. Or are you claiming that the reliability of posters' beliefs should be only be measured according to events selectively cherry picked by you? 🙂 

There is a serious flaw in your methodology!

 

Are you also claiming that posters should be censored on any subject because of which side they favoured during the election? In this perspective, MAGA posters should have been censored during four years because they believed that Trump would win the 2020 election! 😆

  • Haha 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, candide said:

I replied precisely about what I believed. When and about what. The "when" is important as facts come up at different times. Ex Kamala, the poll survey results changed over time, asnd my "belief" followed.

 

And your question has nothing to do with what I was discussing before you invited yourself (you are still welcome)

 

And I have also proven that I have been right on plenty other occasions. Or are you claiming that the reliability of posters' beliefs should be only be measured according to events selectively cherry picked by you? 🙂 

There is a serious flaw in your methodology!

 

Are you also claiming that posters should be censored on any subject because of which side they favoured during the election? In this perspective, MAGA posters should have been censored during four years because they believed that Trump would win the 2020 election! 😆

 

You were duped on many issues and only after the so called facts came out did you change your stance.

 

Your entire last paragraph is just incredible. One of the main reasons the election went as it did.

 

 

 

Posted
46 minutes ago, candide said:

I replied precisely about what I believed. When and about what. The "when" is important as facts come up at different times. Ex Kamala, the poll survey results changed over time, asnd my "belief" followed.

 

And your question has nothing to do with what I was discussing before you invited yourself (you are still welcome)

 

And I have also proven that I have been right on plenty other occasions. Or are you claiming that the reliability of posters' beliefs should be only be measured according to events selectively cherry picked by you? 🙂 

There is a serious flaw in your methodology!

 

Are you also claiming that posters should be censored on any subject because of which side they favoured during the election? In this perspective, MAGA posters should have been censored during four years because they believed that Trump would win the 2020 election! 😆

If you remember, after the 2020 election this board shut down political discussion. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

You were duped on many issues and only after the so called facts came out did you change your stance.

 

Your entire last paragraph is just incredible. One of the main reasons the election went as it did.

 

 

 

So you consider that only the events you cherry pick must be considered. That's what I thought! :biggrin:

Posted
Just now, candide said:

So you consider that only the events you cherry pick must be considered. That's what I thought! :biggrin:

 

You're so predictable. Go back to your ideology. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

You're so predictable. Go back to your ideology. 

You're so predictable, go back to your ideology.

Posted

Didn't DFS Sec Mayorkas say "Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) “does not have the funds” to see Americans through the rest of this Atlantic hurricane season — after the agency spent more than $1.4 billion since the fall of 2022 to address the migrant crisis?"

 

And now this: 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...