Jump to content

Yale Study > COVID Vaccine Injury Exists and Spike Production Persists for Years Inside Body


Recommended Posts

Posted

Yale Just Proved COVID Vaccine Injury Exists and Spike Production Persists for Years Inside The Body

image.png.08bbab6ff5a6101d1d721a30c43be5fa.png

Sourcehttps://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/yale-proved-covid-vax-injury-exists

= = =

In this lengthy deep-dive article by a Midwestern Doctor, he summarizes and reviews the consequences of the now pre-published multi-year watershed study by YALE scientists and researchers.  Here the link to that study > https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1.full.pdf

It's very noteworthy that in the earlier version of this immunological landmark-study the Team that conducted it, strongly endorsed vaccination and that it came from Yale, a very pro-vaccine institution.

But when re-assessing their data for accuracy the Team had the intellectual honesty and decency to change their stance in view of what the data showed.  

And the two main conclusions from the study are that: 

#1 - Covid vaccine injuries are real, and

#2 - Toxic spike production persists for years inside the body of the mRNA Covid-vaccinated. 

Both of these conclusions throw cold water on the initial assertions of the 'safe and effective' Covid-shots whose 'spike production will cease quickly'. 

 

As a Midwestern Doctor wrote:

> In that light, this study is extremely important as it provides objective proof the vaccine is indeed doing something harmful and abnormal, and that it is occurring long after vaccination. As such, when this topic is broached with a skeptical doctor (or academic) you can now say “did you know a multi-year Yale study recently discovered that the vaccine does chronically damage the immune system of certain recipients and cause a variety of persistent and debilitating symptoms?

 

= = =

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

In a few more years, viewers of late night television will start to see commercials asking if "you or a loved one got the mRNA" because you may be entitled to a settlement.

 

It's still too early for the ambulance chasers, but it's coming.

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
Just now, Celsius said:

The real question is ...

 

How LONG do I have?

 

 In my case, I wonder if these symptoms will ever go away, or will they haunt me until I die?  In which case, longevity may not be so important (or desirable).

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Celsius said:

The real question is ...

 

How LONG do I have?

Did you happen to take note of the batch number your jab came from? 

 

If you did, and it was on the hot batch list; you are brown bread now anyway. So not to fret. If you had a placebo, you will pass away with old age.

 

www.howbadismybatch.com

 

Dr D Cahill, reckons that anyone having a 'hot' jab, will have serious effects within 5 years.

Posted
44 minutes ago, MadAtMatrix said:

Well, please publish your verified facts so that I can be informed.

Here are the authors, and where you can reach them to tell them they are wrong. 

 

2025-02-20_13-44-27.png

And where is the peer review? 

 

The cover page from the referenced website:

 

The Forgotten Side of Medicine

The Forgotten Side of Medicine exposes pharmaceutical corruption and remarkable therapies lost to time for the health of humanity.

By A Midwestern Doctor
 
Posted
28 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

And where is the peer review? 

 

The cover page from the referenced website:

 

The Forgotten Side of Medicine

The Forgotten Side of Medicine exposes pharmaceutical corruption and remarkable therapies lost to time for the health of humanity.

By A Midwestern Doctor
 

 

Here the link to the study > https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1.full.pdf

  • Thanks 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

And where is the peer review? 

 

The cover page from the referenced website:

 

The Forgotten Side of Medicine

The Forgotten Side of Medicine exposes pharmaceutical corruption and remarkable therapies lost to time for the health of humanity.

By A Midwestern Doctor
 

You apparently didnt read the above noted article, you looked at the headline and your brought out your "knowledge"

"In this lengthy deep-dive article by a Midwestern Doctor, he summarizes and reviews the consequences of the now pre-published multi-year watershed study by YALE scientists and researchers.  Here the link to that study > https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1.full.pdf"
 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

The Daily Mail suddenly wakes up from its journalistic coma and reports an actual factual story about Covid death shots

 

The British tabloid the Daily Mail has for four years promoted the Covid shots and refused to criticize or investigate any of the obvious health risks they pose to the billions around the world who have received them.

But in recent weeks the Daily Mail seems to have had a sudden change of heart, a jolt of journalistic inspiration, and is running articles that report the actual facts about the dangers of the Covid jabs.

Almost every day the "resistance"  breaks their silence to report what they wouldn't do before.    Here on AN forum....... the resolute vaccine injury deniers continue to dig in to their bunker,  frantically mustering another Ad hominem attack .

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Sorry, to be honest, I did not read your links.

To quote Billy Joel, you may be right and I may be crazy.

 

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9733127/

 

The application of mRNA therapies to cardiovascular diseases is virtually limitless, and ongoing work includes mRNA therapies for myocardial ischemia, heart failure, arrhythmias, hypercholesterolemia, and arterial occlusive diseases. 

 

 

Posted

And here straight from the horse's mouth > as published 19 February on YaleNews

 

https://news.yale.edu/2025/02/19/immune-markers-post-vaccination-syndrome-indicate-future-research-directions

 

Quotes from the article:

 

“It’s clear that some individuals are experiencing significant challenges after vaccination. Our responsibility as scientists and clinicians is to listen to their experiences, rigorously investigate the underlying causes, and seek ways to help,” said Harlan Krumholz, the Harold H. Hines, Jr. Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) at YSM and co-senior author of the study.

 

“We’re only just starting to make headway in understanding PVS,” said Krumholz. “Every medical intervention carries some risk, and it’s important to acknowledge that adverse events can occur with vaccines. Our focus must remain on understanding what these people are experiencing through rigorous science and addressing the needs of those affected with compassion and an open mind.”

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Another thread by people who never got past high school, their knowledge is so superior to the virologists, immunologists and epidemiologists who have years of training and experience.

 

There's even a fruitcake who denies the existence of viruses.

 

In my case, the only side-effect of mRNA vaccines I am aware of is no tolerance of anti-vaxxer idiots.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

Another thread by people who never got past high school, their knowledge is so superior to the virologists, immunologists and epidemiologists who have years of training and experience.

 

There's even a fruitcake who denies the existence of viruses.

 

In my case, the only side-effect of mRNA vaccines I am aware of is no tolerance of anti-vaxxer idiots.

Now that you got that off your chest, what do you have to say about the actual findings?  Surely those lefties at Yale must be paid shills of the anti vaxxer movement, no?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, spacex said:

Now that you got that off your chest, what do you have to say about the actual findings?  Surely those lefties at Yale must be paid shills of the anti vaxxer movement, no?

When I waste my time reading findings posted by the anti-vax crew, I invariably find:

 

(a) They are unqualified to comment on the material.

(b) It is published in a pseudo-scientific journal I have never heard of.

(c) None of it is peer-reviewed by an independent panel.

(d) The data is cherry-picked to suit purpose.

 

I feel I have wasted my time again in explaining this to you.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

When I waste my time reading findings posted by the anti-vax crew, I invariably find:

 

(a) They are unqualified to comment on the material.

(b) It is published in a pseudo-scientific journal I have never heard of.

(c) None of it is peer-reviewed by an independent panel.

(d) The data is cherry-picked to suit purpose.

 

I feel I have wasted my time again in explaining this to you.

 

No matter the qualifications of the Yale University research Team that conducted the study, no amount of evidence presented will convince somebody who is in denial about the now confirmed post-vaccination syndrome. 

 

Here two 'time-wasters' > The heads of the Research Team explaining the study they conducted and its findings >

https://news.yale.edu/2025/02/19/immune-markers-post-vaccination-syndrome-indicate-future-research-directions

And here the link to the study > https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1.full.pdf

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Lacessit said:

When I waste my time reading findings posted by the anti-vax crew, I invariably find:

 

(a) They are unqualified to comment on the material.

(b) It is published in a pseudo-scientific journal I have never heard of.

(c) None of it is peer-reviewed by an independent panel.

(d) The data is cherry-picked to suit purpose.

 

I feel I have wasted my time again in explaining this to you.

a) How do you know they are unqualified? Did you ask them for their credentials and you determined they weren't appropriate, or are you just making assumptions based on your view?

b) Why haven't you heard of medrxiv?  Obviously you aren't widely read on health journals or you would have heard of this journal.

3) You mean those peers who are getting grants and on the take by big pharma?  You do realize that most every medical journal as well as "peers" is/are captured, right?  You do know that right?

4) You mean like the cherry picked data when drugs studies are thrown out when the endpoint isn't met, so instead the endpoint gets changed to say the trial was a success?  No cherry picking there, right?

Posted
10 hours ago, Lacessit said:

There's even a fruitcake who denies the existence of viruses.

That's two 'fruitcakes' on here then.

 

I'm not saying there no no viruses, I say they:

 

1 - Are Indistinguishable from other cell, and tissue, debris, under electron microscopy.

 

2 -  Have never been isolated.

 

3 - Have not been shown to cause anything bad within the body.

 

I say that viruses probably aid the elimination of dead cells and body parts. 

 

As there are no viruses that cause disease; what is the point of vaxxes?

 

It's all a big (very big) money making scheme. Simply keeping the populas in fear, so they are reliant on Big Pharma concoctions to save them

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...