Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nice photo.

Shame that it has nothing to do with the story.

Or is it from that cave complex?

(Difficult when it is 'for reference' only.)

Anyone know where the photo was taken?

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Tropicalevo said:

Nice photo.

Shame that it has nothing to do with the story.

Or is it from that cave complex?

(Difficult when it is 'for reference' only.)

Anyone know where the photo was taken?

 

Just google 'limestone cave at Khao Sam Roi Yot'. There are plenty of images that confirm that it is indeed the same site.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

Nice photo.

Shame that it has nothing to do with the story.

Or is it from that cave complex?

(Difficult when it is 'for reference' only.)

Anyone know where the photo was taken?

 

Sam Roi Yot

https://picarta.ai/ this is a handy tool  for image search

Posted
12 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

Sure, but that was a Lao skeleton.

Doesn't count.

Of course it does. 

 

Thousands of years ago there was NO Thailand, Laos, Cambodia or Indonesia etc. Just a land mass with no name.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tropicalevo said:

Nice photo.

Shame that it has nothing to do with the story.

Or is it from that cave complex?

(Difficult when it is 'for reference' only.)

Anyone know where the photo was taken?

 

Don't get out much huh, that's a famous tourist attraction.

 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JAG said:

I understand Immigration are investigating whether or not he was on overstay.

The first tourist and he ends up dead in a cave.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Interesting.. Just for information,  the oldest one found is from Ethiopia. One study claims it is around 233,000 years old.🤔

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

Nice photo.

Shame that it has nothing to do with the story.

Or is it from that cave complex?

(Difficult when it is 'for reference' only.)

Anyone know where the photo was taken?

 

 

Was the sea level a lot higher 29,000 years ago, because today it's quite a hike to get up to that cave?

Posted
2 hours ago, billd766 said:

Of course it does. 

 

Thousands of years ago there was NO Thailand, Laos, Cambodia or Indonesia etc. Just a land mass with no name.

 

Actually the landmass did have a name... It was called Sundaland and spread across south east Asia, existing before the last ice age...  

 

There is evidence of both Homo Sapien and Homo Erectus remains across the region that indicate migration patterns across this landmas.

 

Thus, the 29000 year 'human' (Homo Sapien) remains bring nothing new to the table from a archeoloigical, geomorphological or migrationary perspective. 

 

Nevertheless, its still an important and excellent discovery, just not quite as 'ground breaking' as implied,

 

Homo sapien remains were found in 2005 in Moh Khiew Cave in Thailand and radio carbon dated back to 25,800 +/- 600 BP matched remains from other area of 'Sundaland' during the Late Pleistocene - Migration patterns were area already well known through these older discoveries.

 

Homo erectus remains, known as 'Lampang Man' were fond dating back 1,000,000 – 500,000 further confirming the migration patterns across Sundaland much further back.

 

 

image.png.368b7a9a9bff0e1ed92020ce08574329.png

Posted

Last time I was in Hua Hin, I saw some bar girls and elderly customers who looked like they came from around the same era.

 

Its not so far from those caves.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Guderian said:

Was the sea level a lot higher 29,000 years ago, because today it's quite a hike to get up to that cave?

 

The Pterodactyl's were tamed back then...  they'd fly em up there... :whistling:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...