Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

It's an interesting situation. Trump wants an end to the war and Europe is seeming to want to continue it. I don't think Europe alone can reverse the way the war is going, leading to a Ukrainian victory. There's a lot of US dependency in both the EU and NATO. One of the big things Ukraine needs is boots on the ground. Will the EU and NATO be willing to do this? If they do then we move into the realm of WWIII.

 

Zero chance of NATO troops joining that war. None. 

 

It seems to deeply irritate some in the West but NATO owes Ukraine nothing. 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, theblether said:

 

Zero chance of NATO troops joining that war. None. 

 

It seems to deeply irritate some in the West but NATO owes Ukraine nothing. 

Not NATO, but some European nations are willing to go there as part of a REAL security guarantee (in lieu of blocking Ukraine from joining) which Ukraine needs if any "deal" isn' going to be a surrender. Trump the Putin loving buffoon wants reparations FROM Ukraine, not TO Ukraine from Russia, and hasn't expressed one word about supporting any kind of security guarantee for Ukraine. If he thinks he's going to get a Nobel Prize for surrendering he's tripping. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

It's an interesting situation. Trump wants an end to the war and Europe is seeming to want to continue it. I don't think Europe alone can reverse the way the war is going, leading to a Ukrainian victory. There's a lot of US dependency in both the EU and NATO. One of the big things Ukraine needs is boots on the ground. Will the EU and NATO be willing to do this? If they do then we move into the realm of WWIII.

Macron has proposed jet fighters armed with nuclear weapons could be posted to Germany.

 

Macron offers nuclear shield to Europe after Trump meeting

  • Sad 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

It's an interesting situation. Trump wants an end to the war and Europe is seeming to want to continue it.

You have got that totally about face IMO.

He wants to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine and allow the world to split into three spheres of influence.

1. USA

2. Russia

3. China

With him as the great leader/negotiator.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

Why don't you just post the PRAVDA link?

it would save you typing all that propaganda!

I've been searching for it. It might be in the Financial Times Russia.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

You have got that totally about face IMO.

He wants to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine and allow the world to split into three spheres of influence.

1. USA

2. Russia

3. China

With him as the great leader/negotiator.

Those 3 have had the largest armies for a long time. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

You have got that totally about face IMO.

He wants to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine and allow the world to split into three spheres of influence.

1. USA

2. Russia

3. China

With him as the great leader/negotiator.

 

What do you mean, split? 

 

That split has been in place for my entire lifetime. 

30-0370a.gif

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, bannork said:

Fine. When the US is next attacked as in 9/11, Europe can shrug it off, it's just an American war.

 

   Why cant the E.U mobilise its armies and go and fight Russia .

A United European Army going to fight their own battles instead of asking the USA to fight their wars for them ?

  • Sad 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

You want people from 2 nations to die to satisfy your Trump hatred. 2m more will die under your plan. No care for life?

It seems you're stuck in checkers thinking.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

The Russian land mass is 17 million square kilometres, the biggest country on the planet.  Ukraine is a mere 600,000 square kilometres, but the soil in eastern Ukraine is the richest on the planet.

 

Wars are about theft writ large, and Putin has a well-earned reputation as a kleptomaniac.

 

IMO he is focused in the wrong direction. Eastern Siberia is a treasure house of all kinds of resources, and China needs them.

 

What's the bet if Ukraine becomes all out war between the EU and Russia, China won't be stabbing Putin in the back?

You have life all figured out amazing.

Posted
20 minutes ago, theblether said:

It is bizarre - and they also forget about the Abraham Accords from his first Presidency, the greatest diplomatic achievement in the Middle East this century, by a country mile. 


Another peace initiative - and if the Dems had pulled it off they would be showered with Nobel Peace prizes. 

 

But not Trump. multiple peace and recognition agreements in the Middle East and he's a "fascist." 

 

Just shocking. 


You're right, it’s bizarre. Trump brokered peace agreements in the Middle East, but none of the countries were actually at war. His failure to include Palestine and moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem likely caused the recent Israeli-Palestinian war.
 

Trump’s "peace efforts" really deserve an Ig Nobel Peace Prize, joining past winners like:

  • 2005: Pepsi Philippines, for causing 800,000 people to riot by announcing the wrong contest number, uniting warring factions in chaos.
  • 2007: Jacques Chirac, for celebrating Hiroshima’s 50th anniversary with atomic bomb tests.
  • 2010: Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan, for proving politicians make more progress by punching each other than by waging war.
  • 2019: The Royal Navy, for ordering sailors to stop using live cannon shells and instead just shout "Bang!"

Trump’s “peace” efforts definitely fit in with these.

List of Ig Nobel Prize winners - Wikipedia


 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, rough diamond said:

Don't you mean "keep drinking in the totally unkool Russian aid(ed) propaganda"?

Joined Friday. 90% posts hating on Trump. 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

Crazy Democrats now in bed with Bush and Cheney. 

 

If you're not with us.......you're with the terrorizors. 

 

Now watch me hit this drive.

Posted
1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

Trump wants an end to the war

Everyone BUT Russia wants an end to the war.

 

So why has Trump suddenly split the one alliance that could stop it spreading and thereby  creating the foundations for WW111?

 

I suggest it is just the threat of WW111 that brings this about so that he subsequently, without any justification as usual, can  claim later that he has brought about peace by creating the new Triumvirate of USA, Russia and China with him as it's unelected dictator!

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

Everyone BUT Russia wants an end to the war.

 

So why has Trump suddenly split the one alliance that could stop it spreading and thereby  creating the foundations for WW111?

 

I suggest it is just the threat of WW111 that brings this about so that he subsequently, without any justification as usual, can  claim later that he has brought about peace by creating the new Triumvirate of USA, Russia and China with him as it's unelected dictator!

Whatever your taking I suggest you slow down a bit. If anything Trump wants to draw Russia away from China. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

Everyone BUT Russia wants an end to the war.

 

So why has Trump suddenly split the one alliance that could stop it spreading and thereby  creating the foundations for WW111?

 

I suggest it is just the threat of WW111 that brings this about so that he subsequently, without any justification as usual, can  claim later that he has brought about peace by creating the new Triumvirate of USA, Russia and China with him as it's unelected dictator!

Fake news

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

Whatever your taking I suggest you slow down a bit. If anything Trump wants to draw Russia away from China. 

Exactly. Friends with Russia, isolates China. Makes them weaker. Better trade deals. Trump is 10 steps ahead of leftists online.

  • Agree 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

That's a great move, escalate the situation with talk of Nukes to the country with the most, way to go froggy

The number is immaterial.

The possession and the acceptance by the other side of your determination  to use them in extremise is what counts.

Both France and the UK maintain at least one SSBN on patrol at all times. 

USA, Russia and China have their own SSBN's on patrol as well.

In addition other countries also have their own nuclear weapons which are capable of delivery by various means out with the SSBN scenario.

Contrary to false and misleading statements both the French and UK systems are TOTALLY independent of any control or limitations by any other country.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 hours ago, transam said:

Hitler is a comparison, for which the World stood together to end the aggression, many on here want Ukraine to lose its land, I find that strange...........😏

 

Didn't half of Europe get split up and ceded to Russian control to end WW2? Are you saying the war was a clean victory and no countries got screwed over to bring it to an end? 

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

 

Didn't half of Europe get split up and ceded to Russian control to end WW2? Are you saying the war was a clean victory and no countries got screwed over to bring it to an end? 

Only the bits of then Europe that they occupied got realigned because the western Allies were too slow to cross the Rhine and slow the Russian advance into Berlin.

The Brits blame Paton and the Yanks blame Montgomery for being late and the French blame everyone with their white flags!

Eisenhower of course blamed nobody and accepted all the credit since Roosevelt had died and Churchill was out of power.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, rough diamond said:

Only the bits of then Europe that they occupied got realigned because the western Allies were too slow to cross the Rhine and slow the Russian advance into Berlin.

The Brits blame Paton and the Yanks blame Montgomery for being late and the French blame everyone with their white flags!

Eisenhower of course blamed nobody and accepted all the credit since Roosevelt had died and Churchill was out of power.

 

Only the bits they occupied? So if history repeats itself what does that mean for the bits of Ukraine already occupied?

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...