/Featured Quiz 28 February 2025 - Weekly Featured - It Happened in 1965
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
.thumb.jpeg.d2d19a66404642fd9ff62d6262fd153e.jpeg)
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
-
Latest posts...
-
50
Crime Phuket Police Hunt Foreigners After Brutal Assault on Mall Security Guard
Where does it say they were white? Or wealthy? It just said foreigners. So probably Laos,Burmese, Chinese, Vietnamese or Indian. -
146
Greta Thunberg’s Gaza Aid Voyage Sparks Controversy After Senator’s Mocking Remark
And this is what the chart of a real genocide looks like. -
327
Trump's crackdown on LA protests is pure hypocrisy
Anyone see the Aussie gal report who got shot point-blank with a rubber bullet. Right on camera. She's talking away with a "Channel 9" mic in her hand. A cop swivels around and nails her in the leg. The officer needs a medal. -
327
Trump's crackdown on LA protests is pure hypocrisy
It depends how the press can frame it. Fortunately, the leftist press (redundant) has very little credibility left. -
1,593
BYD Seal tips, tricks and help
Where you say, "....they're ready for a change...", do you mean they are almost wore out/close to the tire wear nubs after only 13,000Km? -
327
Trump's crackdown on LA protests is pure hypocrisy
I watched the news feed of the vandals. The people who were burning vehicles, damaging businesses and terrorizing motorists on the freeway were not legitimate protestors. I saw multiple Mexican and Palestinian flags being waved. Waving a Mexican flag was sure to incite US citizens who could be expected to be upset by the sight of a foreign flag being waved as US law was challenged.I doubt that a US national was waving those flags. Some people were there to vandalize for the sake of vandalizing . The people have every right to protest peacefully. However, the part of the protest which were not peaceful was indefensible. The people who's property was being destroyed, and the people who needed to travel freely were having their rights and liberties suppressed by the protestors. The local authority, i.e. the Mayor and the Governor were not acting to protect them. The police should have moved in and stopped it as soon as it started. The National Guard is being used to protect federal property, where some of the protests occurred. If the LAPD had intervened sooner to protect the property, there would have been no need for the National Guard call up. Blaming Trump for this is unfair. On the contrary, it is the local government(s) who have allowed this to get out of hand. The courts are the appropriate venue to oppose Trump policies and as court rulings have shown, the courts do intervene when necessary.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now