Jump to content

British Tourists Arrested in Phuket for Reckless Driving and Attack


Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, baansgr said:

Usual dark suspects...stop calling them British..they are not

IF they have British passports, they ARE British (whatever color!)

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
20 hours ago, baansgr said:

Usual dark suspects...stop calling them British..they are not

And today’s award for the most ignorant, toxic, racist post goes to…….

FYI if they hold British passports then they are British.

Aren’t you gonna be late for your KKK meeting?

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

And today’s award for the most ignorant, toxic, racist post goes to…….

FYI if they hold British passports then they are British.

Aren’t you gonna be late for your KKK meeting?

No they are not, I was born in Rhodesia...dosnt make.me.Rhodesian

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, erectem said:

One out of three is pretty much a fair representation of the general Briit. population!

 

And the way things are going it will soon be one in five!

Posted
3 hours ago, erectem said:

One out of three is pretty much a fair representation of the general Briit. population!

You are on the mark at the moment. Coming myself from not too far from London I think those numbers will be reversed in the not too distant future. Those numbers are already reversed in a large number of towns and cities in the UK.

Posted
7 hours ago, sambum said:

 

Unfortunately, not all Brits are "light skinned"  these days!

 

Many non light skinned British benefit from being dual nationals. Just select the passport that is most beneficial.

Posted
9 hours ago, AverageAussie said:

 

Nationality isn't defined by skin color. It's defined by the passport. 

 

Perhaps by you, but not by me.

 

Remigration will sort it all out eventually. :thumbsup:

Posted
29 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Idiots discussing British-ness based on skin color, This thread has turned into a racists support group.

 

There appears to be a backlash against the amounts of immigrants and these groups not integrating into British society and way of life.

 

Why is it only white countries that should be the beneficiaries from multi-culturism and ethnic diversity, yet the very places these people come from are black only, Asian only etc.? 

 

No-one seems to be able to give me an answer to that one.

 

Thailand for the Thais and Britain for the British. It's that simple. 

Posted
15 hours ago, AverageAussie said:

 

Nationality isn't defined by skin color. It's defined by the passport. 

No nationality is defined by intelligence ,, zero = Thai, Brits, Yanks , Arabs ,Indian  ,Russian

Posted
2 hours ago, baansgr said:

I have tri nationality, what does that make me???

 

Multi-national. It's perfectly acceptably to have more than one nationality - IF those countries have provision for this (such as dual citizenship agreements) and you meet the specific requirements.

 

Even if someone doesn't, then individuals can still identify with multiple cultures (such as the country of their birth or their parents' origin), but they can have NATIONALITY only for those where they have (or retain) citizenship - and by implication eligibility for a passport.

 

Quote

Nationality: the official right to belong to a particular country.  :coffee1:

 

If the alleged felon with the dark skin holds a British passport, then he is a British national.

Posted
39 minutes ago, AverageAussie said:

 

Multi-national. It's perfectly acceptably to have more than one nationality - IF those countries have provision for this (such as dual citizenship agreements) and you meet the specific requirements.

 

Even if someone doesn't, then individuals can still identify with multiple cultures (such as the country of their birth or their parents' origin), but they can have NATIONALITY only for those where they have (or retain) citizenship - and by implication eligibility for a passport.

 

 

If the alleged felon with the dark skin holds a British passport, then he is a British national.

British, Namibian and Irish citizenship...what nationality am I...???

Posted
1 hour ago, baansgr said:

British, Namibian and Irish citizenship...what nationality am I...???

 

I thought I answered that question. 

 

But I'll help you out: British, Namibian and Irish.

Posted
2 minutes ago, AverageAussie said:

 

I thought I answered that question. 

 

But I'll help you out: British, Namibian and Irish.

But do I deserve these citizenships, I have never even been to one of the countries...you see how stupid it is defining someone by their passport

Posted
10 minutes ago, baansgr said:

But do I deserve these citizenships...

 

Maybe not, but that's a different question and not relevant. You're confusing nationality with identity.

 

Nationality is very clear cut and just needs a piece of paper. At the risk of introducing a pun; it's "black or white". Being black-skinned doesn't disqualify someone from citizenship.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

These charges include reckless driving causing injury and property damage, which carries penalties of up to one month in prison or a 10,000 baht fine, and carrying a weapon in a public space, punishable by a 100 baht fine.

 

well, that will teach them.

Posted

It's one thing Thailand's new government being scared to have negative publicity that would effect tourism, it's another though to be so lenient for fear of those headlines, that you actually garner headlines for awful behaviour of tourists. 

 

These tourists would not behave like this in Dubai, Singapore, Malaysia or even China. They feel embolded to behave this terrible way because they fear no consequences. 

 

Looking at the possible punishments for carrying a knife, threatening to stab that is an absolute joke and too soft. 

 

There are people who pay money to enjoy a holiday, and these people spoil it for them with their behaviour - there are plenty of others like them, especially the Benidorm chavy cheap Brits and draft dodging Russians. 

 

I'm shocked to realise they aren't even automatically deported. 

 

 

Posted
15 hours ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

 

There appears to be a backlash against the amounts of immigrants and these groups not integrating into British society and way of life.

 

Why is it only white countries that should be the beneficiaries from multi-culturism and ethnic diversity, yet the very places these people come from are black only, Asian only etc.? 

 

No-one seems to be able to give me an answer to that one.

 

Thailand for the Thais and Britain for the British. It's that simple. 

 

 

India is full of immigrants from Bangladesh, Myanmar and Nepal. 

 

Thailand itself is full of immigrants from Myanmar. 

 

Nigeria is struggling to cope with immigrants from Chad, Cameroon and other states. 

 

South Africa is a magnet for immigrants from around Africa. 

 

China itself is full of immigrants from North Korea.

 

Every country has immigration problems. Be it America with Mexico etc. 

 

The problem many European countries have is that the invaded most of these countries. Then used them to help them during the two world wars (go see how many INdians died defending your way of life), then further needed man power to help rebuild their countries. 

 

One thing that there will always be is racist Brits in Thailand - usually in Pattaya. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...