Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, xylophone said:

You believe what you want......but the truth of it is that I have never been a Biden supporter and have voted on the "right" of the political parties in the countries of which I am a ctizen. I just don't like those who vote for the idiot trump , because he is an idiot, a felon, a liar and plain dumb.

 

So the trump goobers can call me a leftie, which is totally wrong. And for the record I have had meetings and private dinners with the Prime Minister of a "first world" country and they were so much more intelligent than trump, so I have a yardstick for leaders and inteligence, and trump just does not measure up in any way shape or form.

So he is both an idiot, and dumb.

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Screaming said:

You should really try not to incite the far left loses. They are suffering enough and maybe it is time to have compassion on them and realize that in this world, not everyone will be on the winning side.

You’ve noticed the passive aggression towards me , myself & I.
 

Thanks @Screaming I’ll take that under consideration , the next time 

I post a thread that is BASED on a report from the same sources that the World News forum uses.

Dems favorability is 27 % , the international left is going down with the ship!

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/03/16/democrats-record-low-favorability-republicans-trump/82471412007/

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Biden was done after one, he can never better that.

The last paragraph in the source , made a similar statement , Lou.

 

“Almost as soon as Joe Biden was inaugurated, the left knew that he was physically and mentally unable to serve as president.

Indeed, that was the point”.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

The list is endless, do you 

The list is endless, can you narrow it down to a specific time frame


So true!

Right now there is a active poll in the 

Source article with the migrant lie coming in First!

The difference between one Potus and the other. Biden administration open borders policies resulted in murder & mayhem on innocent American citizens , not to mention 150 billion dollars covering  the illegal border crossers .

  • Confused 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, they did not...obviously. It is, that simple

Are you feigning stupidity or practicing it?  I can't tell anymore.

 

The poster's statement was so obviously hyperbole. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Not all my own work 🙂 but some left leaning failures not just by the US but also the UK aren't perfect!

Lyndon B. Johnson – War on Poverty: Welfare expansion led to long-term dependency and breakdown of family structures.

Jimmy Carter – Department of Energy creation & deregulated savings and loans: Contributed to energy crises and S&L financial collapse.

Bill Clinton – Community Reinvestment Act (expanded): Encouraged risky lending, linked by critics to the 2008 housing crash.

Barack Obama – Affordable Care Act (Obamacare): Caused premium hikes and insurer exits in some markets.

Joe Biden – American Rescue Plan (2021): Stimulus spending blamed for fueling inflation and labor shortages.

UK

Harold Wilson – Nationalisation policies (1960s–70s): Led to inefficient state-run industries and economic stagnation.

James Callaghan – Wage and price controls (1970s): Contributed to the “Winter of Discontent” with mass strikes and inflation.

Tony Blair – Open-door EU immigration policy: Strained public services and created backlash fueling Brexit.

Gordon Brown – Big expansion of public spending (2000s): Left UK vulnerable during 2008 financial crisis.

Keir Starmer (Labour positions, not PM) – Pledge to rejoin EU institutions: Criticized as ignoring Brexit referendum outcome (hypothetical/future-oriented).

  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

My family has been in the education field for generations and I was brought up to believe that there is no such thing as a dumb question.  I guess there always has to be an exception.

If you had witnessed the news items about folks wearing blackface makeup in plays or in college in the US over the past decade you might understand the question.  Not everything you learned growing up I guess helped you at all.

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, simple1 said:

 

Incorrect Legislation would be required to block asylum seekers. Such action would be in breach of current international law, but we know trump acts unilaterally.

 

As a signatory to the 1967 Protocol, and through U.S. immigration law, the United States has legal obligations to provide protection to those who qualify as refugees. The Refugee Act established two paths to obtain refugee status—either from abroad as a resettled refugee or in the United States as an asylum seeker.

 

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/asylum-united-states

 

Almost none of them are asylum seekers, they are illegal immigrant benefit seekers turning up from safe countries, or lying about their place of origin, for hand outs, not sanctuary from danger. Obama deported millions, seemed to be no problem then.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, proton said:

 

Almost none of them are asylum seekers, they are illegal immigrant benefit seekers turning up from safe countries, or lying about their place of origin, for hand outs, not sanctuary from danger. Obama deported millions, seemed to be no problem then.

Which brings up another lie,

kids in cages! Once it was discovered, they / them still used the fake news to deflect .

 

“THE FACTS: The photos, taken by The Associated Press, were from 2014, during the Obama administration, but were presented by liberal activists as if they showed the effects of Trump’s immigration policy now. Villaraigosa, Favreau and some others deleted their tweets when the mistake was pointed out”.

https://apnews.com/article/a98f26f7c9424b44b7fa927ea1acd4d4#

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, simple1 said:

 

Incorrect Legislation would be required to block asylum seekers. Such action would be in breach of current international law, but we know trump acts unilaterally.

 

As a signatory to the 1967 Protocol, and through U.S. immigration law, the United States has legal obligations to provide protection to those who qualify as refugees. The Refugee Act established two paths to obtain refugee status—either from abroad as a resettled refugee or in the United States as an asylum seeker.

 

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/asylum-united-states

No one is attempting to block admission of qualified refugees. 

 

The truth is that no legislation was needed to close the border. 

 

Biden opened it intentionally, and Trump closed it back up in a couple weeks. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, proton said:

 

Almost none of them are asylum seekers, they are illegal immigrant benefit seekers turning up from safe countries, or lying about their place of origin, for hand outs, not sanctuary from danger. Obama deported millions, seemed to be no problem then.

 

try answering my question.

 

Re Obama...

 

"Why were returns and removals higher under Obama? The short answer is because there was a lot more illegal immigration under Obama and also because interior enforcement was very strong in Obama's first term," she said. "The peak of interior enforcement was the last year of Bush and the first year of Obama. And then under Obama, he's making a decision, and you can track this through certain policies that were issued, to reduce interior enforcement."

However, Vaughan also cautioned against reading too much into the DHS returns and removal numbers without understanding the context. She said that in 2012, the Obama administration started counting removals by Border Patrol the same as interior removals by ICE, further blurring the lines on what is considered a deportation.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deporter-in-chief-obama-surpassed-deportations-under-trumps-first-term

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, simple1 said:

Asylum seekers have to be assessed to be recognised as refugees for entry to the US. Where are they being processed and how many permitted entry to the US out of the millions around the world? It is nonsense to claim qualified refugees are permitted to enter the US; the US has an annual quote allocated for refugees entry. When trump was last in power he dramatically reduced the allocation. Current allocation:

 

in 2017, President Obama set a ceiling of 110,000, but President Trump reduced it to 50,000 through an executive order after taking office.

 

https://usafacts.org/answers/how-many-refugees-come-to-the-us/country/united-states/

 

It is incorrect to claim no legislation required to block asylum seekers entering the US as they are permitted by the UN refugee Convention to which the US is a signatory, unless the US has already passed relevant domestic legislation.

Non-Mexicans can legally be compelled to stay in Mexico until they are approved. Asylum seekers do not get to choose which country they go to.

 

Again, no one is attempting to block admission of qualified refugees. 

 

The truth is that no legislation was needed to close the border. 

 

Biden opened it intentionally, and Trump closed it back up in a couple weeks. 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

try answering my question.

 

Re Obama...

 

"Why were returns and removals higher under Obama? The short answer is because there was a lot more illegal immigration under Obama and also because interior enforcement was very strong in Obama's first term," she said. "The peak of interior enforcement was the last year of Bush and the first year of Obama. And then under Obama, he's making a decision, and you can track this through certain policies that were issued, to reduce interior enforcement."

However, Vaughan also cautioned against reading too much into the DHS returns and removal numbers without understanding the context. She said that in 2012, the Obama administration started counting removals by Border Patrol the same as interior removals by ICE, further blurring the lines on what is considered a deportation.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/deporter-in-chief-obama-surpassed-deportations-under-trumps-first-term

Ah, faux news, 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

1): Domestic law or executive order - both of which are in breach to UN Convention ratified by USA.

 

2) Untrue, US has a quota system in place i.e. restricted entry for assessed refugees.

 

3) To close border for asylum seekers is in breach of international convention

 

4)  During President Joe Biden’s term, Border Patrol arrested an unprecedented number of immigrants who crossed illegally into the United States. Many believe Biden caused this increase in migration by reducing border enforcement. However, data obtained by the Cato Institute through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) challenges this narrative. In fact, the border crisis began before Biden took office and ended before he left.

 

https://www.cato.org/blog/biden-didnt-cause-border-crisis-part-1-summary

 

No more, tired of repeating myself to no avail.

Yeah, telling the same lies over and over only works on leftists.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

The worst lie the left told? Tough one. I'd say forcing the public to accept the lie that the Biden corruption laptop was Russian disinformation is no1. It changed an election result, ended American democracy and darned nearly got us into WW3.

 

I find the Build Back Better narrative to be a particularly disgusting lie too. I mean nothing was built, nothing was back and nothing was better. Cheers lefties.

 

And yes yes yes, I am well aware Trump misremembered the weather on his insuguration day

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Yeah, telling the same lies over and over only works on leftists.

 

Ever noticed the attempts of falsely alleging home truths by MAGA  against their opposition actually factually align to themselves?

  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 163

      German Tourist Severely Beaten in Pattaya by Group of 10 Men

    2. 144

      Can Americans afford vacations anymore?

    3. 28

      Over protection of children

    4. 27

      Toddler Hospitalised with Bone-Deep Dog Bite in Buriram

    5. 525

      Israel Hamas War the Widening Middle East Conflict

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...