Police Face Backlash Over refusing to say that wanted ‘female’ is actually male

[BangkokReady]

16 minutes ago, Purdey said:

Imagine if they had said "man" and everyone was ignoring someone in a dress.

 

There's no way this person is ignored where they go if they're wearing a dress.

 

If they said "man", they would have gone on to say that the person dresses/identifies as a woman.

[klauskunkel]

9 hours ago, Social Media said:

We have reviewed this appeal and have determined that it would have been appropriate to describe the person as a transgender woman, or someone who identified as a woman,

Just describe the person exactly the way that person presents itself. In this case:

Receding, lanky shoulder length dark hair, fake long eye lashes, two eyes with washed out color.

The persons believes it is female while having been assigned XY chromosomes at birth.

[Sir Dude]

Should have just posted a picture of it and said "Ridiculous criminal freak wanted".

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, BangkokReady said:

 

OK.  Fairly simple.  I'm sure you know all of this, but just don't want to be honest about it.

 

1. Only giving the assumed name, when the person could be using their real name.

2. Referring to the suspect as a women, when "she" clearly has the appearance of a man makes identification harder (I know you think the "but the mugshot" argument is a get out, but people don't see a mugshot walking down the street, please learn to think critically).

3. Describing the person as a woman means that someone could believe that they have female physiology and are less dangerous than they really are, leading to someone being put in danger.

4. If police staff believe her to be a woman, then, once caught, she might be secured somewhere with women, putting them in danger.

5. If police officers believe her to be a woman, then officers might use less force when making an arrest, believing her to have the strength of a woman, rather than an adult man.

 

The list could go on, as there are so many scenarios where it could cause harm.  But I think that's plenty to support my point and prove you wrong (as usual).

 

It's pretty clear how correct I am.  I'd love to see you back up your points like this now and then, but we both know you don't because you can't.

1. Could be using any name, a double barrel name even, just like any fugitive from justice. 

 

2. Refer to the fugitive as the person whose ‘mug shot’ is attached to the police report - The same ‘mug shot’ that is getting so much attention in this thread.

 

3. Bizarre. Police noticed routinely include warnings not to approach suspects/fugitives who are dangerous , regardless of their gender. No such warning is included.

 

https://www.surrey.police.uk/news/surrey/news/2025/03---march/can-you-help-us-find-skyla-stone/
 

4. Once caught the police hand fugitives over to the prison service for detention. They and the police deal with transgender prisoners on a daily basis.

 

5. Police arrest violent suspects/fugitives on a daily basis, it’s what they do. There is no indication in the police notice that this individual is violent.

 

I’m sure your list could go on, length is not any sign of fact. 
 

The most likely people to turn this fugitive in are friends, family, people who know the fugitive.

 

Meanwhile enjoy the outrage and the discussion of the mugshot.

 

[BangkokReady]

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m sure your list could go on, length is not any sign of fact. 

 

What I have said is perfectly factual.  You not liking it does not change that, nor do your bizarre attempts at disagreement.  🤷‍♂️

 

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Meanwhile enjoy the outrage and the discussion of the mugshot.

 

Quite the assumption on your part to suggest that I enjoy your outrage.  It's actually quite tiring.  Those of us with functioning brains simply acknowledge the risk things like this create and move on.

[Chomper Higgot]

2 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

What I have said is perfectly factual.  You not liking it does not change that, nor do your bizarre attempts at disagreement.  🤷‍♂️

 

 

Quite the assumption on your part to suggest that I enjoy your outrage.  It's actually quite tiring.  Those of us with functioning brains simply acknowledge the risk things like this create and move on.

What you’ve said is perfectly assumed.

Your use of the terms ‘could’ and ‘might’ confirms this.

The mugshot as a means of identification is obviously getting some attention.

 

 

 

 

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What you’ve said is perfectly assumed.

Your use of the terms ‘could’ and ‘might’ confirms this.

 

The use of "could" and "might" actually suggest the opposite of assumption.  If your brain wasn't crippled by your ideology, you might know this.

 

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The mugshot as a means of identification is obviously getting some attention.

 

More irrelevant nonsense spewed from your ideology hole.  Nothing to do with what I wrote.

[Chomper Higgot]

19 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

The use of "could" and "might" actually suggest the opposite of assumption.  If your brain wasn't crippled by your ideology, you might know this.

 

 

More irrelevant nonsense spewed from your ideology hole.  Nothing to do with what I wrote.

 

 Let me know when you have any evidence of what you claim is ‘literally’ occurring; ‘could’ and ‘might’ are bit short of ‘literally’, regardless of what ‘hole’ they are ‘spewed from’.

 

 

10 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

Ridiculous.  This is literally a case of endangering everyone just to not offend a very tiny minority.  A perfect microcosm of the whole trans debate.

 

[blaze master]

3 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

please learn to think critically).

 

Ummm 😅

[BangkokReady]

18 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 Let me know when you have any evidence of what you claim is ‘literally’ occurring; ‘could’ and ‘might’ are bit short of ‘literally’, regardless of what ‘hole’ they are ‘spewed from’.

 

You asked me to explain something, so I did.  I'm not sure what else I can do to make you understand.

 

To be honest, you sound a little unhinged.  You really haven't made a very clear point.  It's very rambling and you're quoting one thing that was said in response to another, as though there was a direct connection.  You're asking one thing, and then pretending like I responded to something else retroactively.

 

It's pretty incoherent, even for you.

 

Maybe have a rest, come back and re-read what you wrote, and see if you can understand/explain your point a little clearer.  🤷‍♂️

[blaze master]

Just now, BangkokReady said:

not sure what else I can do to make you understand.

 

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmm

[Chomper Higgot]

6 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

You asked me to explain something, so I did.  I'm not sure what else I can do to make you understand.

 

To be honest, you sound a little unhinged.  You really haven't made a very clear point.  It's very rambling and you're quoting one thing that was said in response to another, as though there was a direct connection.  You're asking one thing, and then pretending like I responded to something else retroactively.

 

It's pretty incoherent, even for you.

 

Maybe have a rest, come back and re-read what you wrote, and see if you can understand/explain your point a little clearer.  🤷‍♂️

Ah, the ad hominem.

 

 

[Kinok Farang]

My personal favourite from the UK was when the police were looking for a dangerous black man.

They described him as a male in a red jumper.

[quake]

Just one more example of Broken Britain. 

[JonnyF]

They should just tell the truth. Public safety is at stake.

 

Just say it's a man that often dresses as a woman. 

 

Otherwise all he has to do is shave his head, grow 2 days of stubble and wear men's clothes and everyone is going to be ignoring him because they think they are looking for a woman. 

[jippytum]

Due to woke officials this fugative has probably started to  wear dress prior to arrest to ensure incarceration in a womans prison. 

[thaibeachlovers]

On 3/25/2025 at 12:54 AM, BangkokReady said:

More irrelevant nonsense spewed from your ideology hole.  Nothing to do with what I wrote.

I like that. Very appropriate.