Jump to content

Trump Officials Discussed Secret Yemen Strike Plans on Signal, Accidentally Added Journalist


Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, Presnock said:

When your coach is actually playing for the opposing team to win, one has to realize why the strange use of amateurs to run the team.  It seems more and more obvious to me but that is my opinion and I can only base that on my life experiences and what I see since Trump moved back into the WH.  So far, he has proven to me that my opinion is correct so far, yeah it may change but I really don't believe that it will.  At least not in my lifetime.

In other words, even what little you see is coloured by your fantasy. 

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, MadAtMatrix said:

They added the guy KNOWING he would leak this to show Europe that the US is fed up with propping them up. After all of the cuts Trump is doing, you don’t think that this was planned? 

I don't think he has to plan any of thes antics, just knowing how amateuristic they all are to government operations, they can screw it up in way too many ways for a plan to work. that is my opinion of the whole Trump team 

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Presnock said:

I don't think he has to plan any of thes antics, just knowing how amateuristic they all are to government operations, they can screw it up in way too many ways for a plan to work. that is my opinion of the whole Trump team 

It wasn’t him planning it, was his team. Why should the USA be protecting anyone but itself. Let the barking chihuahuas in Europe go get slapped around on their own dime. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Presnock said:

 

what little! every day this amateur team does something unheard of before but just because they are a member of Trump's team, it is alright because they are all rich otherwise they would not be even invited to any of the offices!

Well tell us how they are "amateurs"?

 

Is Hegseth a billionaire?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, MadAtMatrix said:

They added the guy KNOWING he would leak this to show Europe that the US is fed up with propping them up. After all of the cuts Trump is doing, you don’t think that this was planned? 

Be careful going outside the box here, hah. I didnt think of that. Double game, threaten Vlad and light a fire under the euros.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Peabody said:

Mar-a-Lardo said

Our old friend irrational hatred rearing it's ugly head again. I wonder whether you considered it relevant and morally correct to attack the likes of Abrams, Nadler, Fetterman, Christie and co on their weight issues? 

Isn't it strange how the left are all-in on attacking an old man for being disabled(hallux rigidus), a color they hate, and being portly? 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
55 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

Afghanistan, Afghanistan, Afghanistan.

 

All of a sudden you care a lot about Kabul?

 

Where were you when Chimpy invaded?

 

Believe or not I was against going into Aghanistan.  I was in the minority. 

 

We shouldn't have gone in there in the first place.  Common sense.  You can't change cavemen mentality.

 

After 9/11, 90% supported Bush's military action in Aghanistan.

 

One redneck in a bar in Flagstaff almost punched me out after he told me he was proud to be American.

 

I told him no one chooses where they're born.

Be it in the slums of Calcutta or the middle of nowhere cowtown Arizona. 

 

Oh, the seething anger.

 

Do MAGA Jeniuses all think self-determination of birthplace is some kind of divine right only for themselves? 😄

 

All that was necessary about sending troops to Afghanistan was to read Michner's "Caravans" - then look how the Brits  and Russian military did and the results of those two.  By sending any troops there, was to be sentencing them to death and giving the local non-Taliban-ISIS troops false promises.  A total waste of men and money.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

Yes. Maybe that 13 year old hacker in Mom's basement can't hack it, but the US, Russia, China, Israel, Iran and North Korea all can. The bozos might as well have held the meeting live on Fox.

 

The clowns are lucky Iran wasn't online, as they could have alerted the Houtis.

 

There is a reason the West Wing has a Situation Room that is a SCIF. There's also a reason the USG developed its own encryption systems where---if a SCIF meeting is not possible---classified discussion can take place.

 

Biden Admin used SIGNAL for commo during the Transition, but not for classified.

 

Interesting Walz, Hegseth, Rubio, Ratcliffe, Miller, etc. chose not to include the President on such a critical discussion. Previous Presidents would always be involved and included. Also interesting not a one of them thought to wonder who "JG" was and why he was in on the discussion. Pretty amateur all around. Hey, but it only involves the safety and security of US forces and equipment, and POTUS views them as "suckers and losers" anyway.

 

I can't imagine how it must feel carrying all of that inside daily. At least you vent and get it out. Which is good. But you really seem so angry all the time. 

 

I saw you post a comment once without the childish name calling and spite.....once.

 

  • Confused 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Our old friend irrational hatred rearing it's ugly head again. I wonder whether you considered it relevant and morally correct to attack the likes of Abrams, Nadler, Fetterman, Christie and co on their weight issues? 

Isn't it strange how the left are all-in on attacking an old man for being disabled(hallux rigidus), a color they hate, and being portly? 

I love when Gutfeld does the Christie, Behar and the stupid dude from Illinios fat jokes. Especially with my belly, I get good laughs.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, BLMFem said:

No, not when the person in question has made it his hallmark to ridicule others for all kinds of reasons (you know, being a war veteran, having a physical handicap, being female and thus menstruating....I could go on and on here.)

For that alone he deserves to be called what he really is; a fat orange ****. 

Thats what one of my exwives said when I told her she was clearly "on the rag" when indeed she was and complaining.

 

I dont run my life in others level of offense. Or complain about being offended and then being offensive myself.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

You are truly grasping for straws and it's starting to appear rather pathetic, anything to defend the monster, anything to defend a flailing president who's completely out of his depth. 

 

In some countries a leak like the one "Hesgeth the minor" was responsible for would be a call for a major tribunal, and possibly the death penalty. 

 

   Although I haven't actually defended Trump at all .

You erroneously attributed a quote to him , for some reason you made up a campaign promise by him .

   I am just pointing out that claim is wrong  .

Trump  never did say they things you claimed he did 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, BLMFem said:

Claiming OPSEC has been maintained while in a message group on an unsecure app containing a group member that is a journalist is the very antithesis of professionalism. The cluelessness required to pull this of is of cosmic proportions. It's a feces show of hitherto unknown proportions, a cluster-frack so massive that songs and poems will be written about it for decades to come.

If you believe Pete Hegseth is more professional than you I can only advise you to get help, because having so low self-esteem isn't healthy. PM me if you need to talk!

Hes lead men in combat and has a degree from Yale? How about you?

 

Ive never led men in Combat. He wins. Self esteeem is recognizing the greatness of others without being intimidated.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Hmmmmm.....what if it was exactly what it seems to be; a massive eff up by a bunch of bumbling morons? 

It could be. There are a lot of could bes

 

But if these were government phones, with government software, used under government restrictions, how did this Democratic operative key to the Russian hoax obtain what he was alleged to obtain. How did his number get added? Could we have a case of espionage here?

 

Could it be that some deep stater put the operative on the chat?

 

Wouldnt be the first time this guy has been involved in such hoaxes.

 

Interesting how the screaming from the Dems has risen to a spittlefroth frenzy. Have we seen this before.?

 

Hell, we got folks here who still think the Russia hoax is real and that Joe Biden was competant.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...