-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
42
Former Japanese Minister of Internal Affairs developed cancer from the covid jabs
It is not a question of lying. Rather, it is your attempt to understand and to cope with a traumatic event. Having an "answer" provides emotional comfort. The reality of cancer is is that it is a genetically induced event. The genetic basis is caused either through deficient or otherwise defective genetic material. It can have existed since conception or it could have been induced by environmental exposures such as radiation, chemicals and other cell damaging agents. Many of the injuries alleged to be associated with the Covid vaccines have nothing to do with the vaccines and instead are named only because the person with the issue had the vaccine. In almost all of these cases, there is no genetic testing to determine if the "injured" party had a pre-existing genetic disposition to the claimed injury. In other cases, the health and behavioural characteristics of the injured party are not stated. We hear of "heart attacks", but what is not mentioned is whether or not the person was obese, a smoker, had an existing chronic disease like diabetes, high blood pressure , high lipid and cholesterol counts etc. There are adverse reactions with every drug and vaccine. Almost all are minor. Some are serious, but the people who are most likely to have a serious ADR almost always have an underlying medical condition, known or unknown, that heightens the risk of an ADR. The reality is that hundreds of millions of Covid vaccine doses have been administered, and tens of millions of people have avoided serious covid infections resulting in hospital stays or even death. There may have been a small number of serious ADRS and this is both expected and understood. However, the fact is that there has been no great die off or cascade of injured people as the covid vaccine opponents claim. The Covid vaccines are proven by the results to be some of the safest vaccines in history. -
28
Denied Entry
You have correct answer above. Just to add to your thread... For others.. You can always opt to enter via land border. Of course that's depends on location. -
121
Stop the war in 1 day, now it's an European thing
Another example of Taco by the look of things: The United States of America may withdraw from the negotiation process to resolve the full-scale war in Ukraine if White House leader Donald Trump believes he is being "used," warns White House Special Envoy for Ukraine Keith Kellogg on ABC News. "I think when you talk about walking away if he believes he's being used and that there is no hope in progress going forward, he goes: 'We’re done with this. Europe, we leave it over to you'," Kellogg stated, commenting on Trump’s threats to exit the negotiation process. Trump's team threatens to exit Ukraine negotiations amid growing rift -
3
Anywhere I can offload a large collection of English fiction?
There is a 2nd hand book shop on Chaofa Rd East on the left hand side from Chalong circle about 2KM down the road.. -
40
Things you like about Thailand
I live in the middle of Chiang Rai most of the time. Play golf 3 times a week, eat out regularly at good restaurants. The spaghetti and mango smoothie is at Singha Park. The mussuman curry is one dish my GF cooks for me in the village. IIRC the Singha Park meal for two people was AUD 15. Probably AUD 40-50 as any two pub meals in Oz. I'd agree places such as Bangkok and Pattaya are more expensive. However, Chiang Rai is not the bush - far from it. -
75
Three U.S. ex-presidents denounce the current one in a two-week stretch
@TedG here's a $100 lesson on financials that I'm giving you for free. US gov't needs to borrow $4000 and is willing to pay 5% for a 1 year term. Scenario A: US gov't sells a $4000 Treasury bill to a Chinese investor. The gov't adds the $4000 to the balance in the Treasury. At the end of the year the US gov't cuts a cheque for $4000+$200 and sends it to the Chinese investor. The US taxpayers collectively replace the $200 with taxes paid to the US Treasury Scenario B: US gov't sells a $4000 Treasury bill to the SS trust fund. The gov't adds the $4000 to the balance in the Treasury. At the end of the year the US gov't cuts a cheque for $4000+$200 and sends it to the SS trust fund. The US taxpayers collectively replace the $200 with taxes paid to the US Treasury. @TedG do you need help to spot the only difference between A and B?
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
.thumb.jpg.3ee24d9400fb02605ea21bc13b1bf901.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now