PETITION to Urge Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to immediately ban COVID vaccines and investigate

[Red Phoenix]

 

Source: https://www.change.org/p/urge-robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-immediately-ban-covid-vaccines-and-investigate

= = =

Jenna McCarthy who has a substack devoted to Covid-19 Vax-issues, wrote and published an Open Letter on that substack < https://jennasside.rocks/p/an-open-letter-to-robert-f-kennedy >.  That Open Letter was addressed to RFK jr to urge him to immediately ban covid-vaccines and investigate.   

And many of her readers/followers then asked her to spread it widely and issue it as a Petition addressed both to RFK jr and president Trump. 

 

When you feel same way as her - read the well-written Open Letter - you can opt to sign the Petition and share it via e-mail, Facebook, X, etc.  

Really easy to do and worthwhile as it is absolutely urgent to stop this assault on people's health. 

 

You can read the Petition and the Open Letter here

> https://www.change.org/p/urge-robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-immediately-ban-covid-vaccines-and-investigate

[rumak]

1 hour ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

Source: https://www.change.org/p/urge-robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-immediately-ban-covid-vaccines-and-investigate

= = =

Jenna McCarthy who has a substack devoted to Covid-19 Vax-issues, wrote and published an Open Letter on that substack < https://jennasside.rocks/p/an-open-letter-to-robert-f-kennedy >.  That Open Letter was addressed to RFK jr to urge him to immediately ban covid-vaccines and investigate.   

And many of her readers/followers then asked her to spread it widely and issue it as a Petition addressed both to RFK jr and president Trump. 

 

When you feel same way as her - read the well-written Open Letter - you can opt to sign the Petition and share it via e-mail, Facebook, X, etc.  

Really easy to do and worthwhile as it is absolutely urgent to stop this assault on people's health. 

 

You can read the Petition and the Open Letter here

> https://www.change.org/p/urge-robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-immediately-ban-covid-vaccines-and-investigate

 

Thanks for sharing that with the AN  forum !

[fredwiggy]

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines-may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/

[rumak]

3 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines-may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/

 

Reuters, yahoo, cnbc, cnn, ny times, washington post, nbc, abc, disney.......... and many many more mainstreet media sites are owned by democrat siding leftists .

They literally report the same bias ,  almost word for word.  And the "studies" they quote are funded and thus controlled by the same people .

 

"Biden is sharp as a tack"  ......  "safe and effective" 

 

Billions of people understand these sources are only interested in their agenda.

 

check what has happened to your beloved CNN and ABC  viewership .   down, down, down.     I guess their low low ratings are because all the rest of us are wrong for thinking they are just propoganda machines. 

[fredwiggy]

2 minutes ago, rumak said:

 

Reuters, yahoo, cnbc, cnn, ny times, washington post, nbc, abc, disney.......... and many many more mainstreet media sites are owned by democrat siding leftists .

They literally report the same bias ,  almost word for word.  And the "studies" they quote are funded and thus controlled by the same people .

 

"Biden is sharp as a tack"  ......  "safe and effective" 

 

Billions of people understand these sources are only interested in their agenda.

 

check what has happened to your beloved CNN and ABC  viewership .   down, down, down.     I guess their low low ratings are because all the rest of us are wrong for thinking they are just propoganda machines. 

Reuters is one of the few unbiased agencies, along with AP. The others one, yes.

[rumak]

6 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Reuters is one of the few unbiased agencies, along with AP. The others one, yes.

 

you are absolutely wrong .    but, hopefully (since you believe me on the others)...

 

you will dig a little deeper into those two you doubt me on.  cmon,  you can do it  (Please do not look on google for "fact checks" or truth .......... THEY TOO  win the prize for selective bias !

[fredwiggy]

5 minutes ago, rumak said:

 

you are absolutely wrong .    but, hopefully (since you believe me on the others)...

 

you will dig a little deeper into those two you doubt me on.  cmon,  you can do it  (Please do not look on google for "fact checks" or truth .......... THEY TOO  win the prize for selective bias !

You can believe what you want, but I'm not wrong. All news agencies report the truth, and most report biased opinions. Reuters and AP have been shown to be the most unbiased agencies. Don't get into the assume game like some others here do, as your opinions mean nothing either, along with many you deem as right. There are many reporters in every agency, and a lot of opinions. Some in fact are right. You have to prove another wrong before you can make a statement about them, which is hard because many take sides. I don't, seeing both sides are right and wrong on ideas. Better to sit back and see what the real truths are.

[Digitalbanana]

18 minutes ago, rumak said:

Billions of people understand these sources are only interested in their agenda.

Billions of people would choose science over conspiracy theory. Common sense. People are born with it.

[Stiddle Mump]

48 minutes ago, rumak said:

 

Thanks for sharing that with the AN  forum !

Indeed! This member is on the ball. 

 

The times they are a'changing for sure. For the better? Well for sure the mRNA jabs need stopping. They have done enough damage. And will continue to do so.

 

However! I'd like to see more. Much more!! First thing is to get out of that awful WHO. Start looking after the health of US citizens. OK! So I know Kennedy is doing so, but until he breaks the stranglehold of Big Pharma, I'll reserve judgement on his actions.

 

I have personally been a member of Childrens Defence, and AFL Doctors since the start of covid. But I don't sit pretty with them overall.

 

IMO, these well respected groups, need to expose the 'Germ Theory' for what it is, and how it has ruined the health of millions of Americans.

 

I'd like also to see a drive towards parents taking more responsibility for their children's health. Just say ''NO'', when some white-coat says something that don't sit well with them. Not much more important things than the health of yer kids.

[Patong2021]

Did you know that many of the same people who promote the. false Covid claims also  believe that Pigeons are actually government surveillance  mechanisms.

https://pigeonsarentreal.co.uk/about/

[Ben Zioner]

34 minutes ago, rumak said:

Billions of people understand these sources are only interested in their agenda.

Yep, you are Legion.

[Patong2021]

2 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Indeed! This member is on the ball. 

 

The times they are a'changing for sure. For the better? Well for sure the mRNA jabs need stopping. They have done enough damage. And will continue to do so.

 

However! I'd like to see more. Much more!! First thing is to get out of that awful WHO. Start looking after the health of US citizens. OK! So I know Kennedy is doing so, but until he breaks the stranglehold of Big Pharma, I'll reserve judgement on his actions.

 

I have personally been a member of Childrens Defence, and AFL Doctors since the start of covid. But I don't sit pretty with them overall.

 

IMO, these well respected groups, need to expose the 'Germ Theory' for what it is, and how it has ruined the health of millions of Americans.

 

I'd like also to see a drive towards parents taking more responsibility for their children's health. Just say ''NO'', when some white-coat says something that don't sit well with them. Not much more important things than the health of yer kids.

My  recommendation for improving children's health would be to keep you and your ignorant  claims  away from them.

[Stiddle Mump]

Just now, Patong2021 said:

My  recommendation for improving children's health would be to keep you and your ignorant  claims  away from them.

Oh dear!! At it again are we?

 

I'm interested in the truth. Is it real - as we humans understand it - or is it simply made up nonsense?

 

I'm sure you would agree that children in the US deserve a good healthy life! I'm no American, but I'm dismayed to know if the overall state of the nation's health is terrible and getting worse.

[fredwiggy]

2 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Oh dear!! At it again are we?

 

I'm interested in the truth. Is it real - as we humans understand it - or is it simply made up nonsense?

 

I'm sure you would agree that children in the US deserve a good healthy life! I'm no American, but I'm dismayed to know if the overall state of the nation's health is terrible and getting worse.

Children in America have all the chances for a healthy life. The problem is the parents who aren't teaching good health habits and nutrition to their children. The same everywhere as the increasing overweight percentage continues to rise. I always eat healthy and show my 8 year old daughter what's good for her, although she doesn't yet understand most of it. The problem lies when she goes back to her grandma's house (mom lives there). They eat rice every meal and snacks are a daily thing, empty calories all kids would rather eat. Most of her family has diabetes, which makes it worse because it's also in my family and this is the reason I want my daughter to eat right. If you come from a family where they didn't practice healthy eating, you're future has problems, unless you want to do whatever you can to ensure your own good health and adopt different thinking.

[Stiddle Mump]

8 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Children in America have all the chances for a healthy life. The problem is the parents who aren't teaching good health habits and nutrition to their children. The same everywhere as the increasing overweight percentage continues to rise. I always eat healthy and show my 8 year old daughter what's good for her, although she doesn't yet understand most of it. The problem lies when she goes back to her grandma's house (mom lives there). They eat rice every meal and snacks are a daily thing, empty calories all kids would rather eat. Most of her family has diabetes, which makes it worse because it's also in my family and this is the reason I want my daughter to eat right. If you come from a family where they didn't practice healthy eating, you're future has problems, unless you want to do whatever you can to ensure your own good health and adopt different thinking.

Hi Fred.

 

I don't disagree with you about healthy nutricious eating. I've wrote thousands on words on this. Also stay away, AMAP, from sugary drinks and cakes. Drink plenty of clean water also.

 

But where we disagree, is the flip side of the health coin; toxicity. And IMO, the most damaging toxin around is vaccines. Not just vaxes but medicine generally.

 

Nature has the answers we seek.

[fredwiggy]

Just now, Stiddle Mump said:

Hi Fred.

 

I don't disagree about healthy nutricious eating. I've wrote thousands on words on this. Also stay away, AMAP, for sugary drinks and cakes. Drink plenty of clean water also.

 

But where we disagree, is the flip side of the health coin; toxicity. And IMO, the most damaging toxin around is vaccines. Not just vaxes but medicine generally.

 

Nature has the answers we seek.

Nature might have the ability to cure all diseases, but it might take longer than humans have left on this planet before that happens. Vaccines have been proven to be necessary to save lives, many millions. Some vaccines can cause some people trouble, as some foods can also. Can we live without medicines? No, as many don't take well enough care of themselves or are subjected to outside toxins that enter a healthy body and can't be fought by white blood cells alone. If we didn't have medicines, although many are over prescribed and cause deaths and side effects, many people would die.

[Stiddle Mump]

Just now, fredwiggy said:

Vaccines have been proven to be necessary to save lives, many millions.

IMO, no vaccine has EVER saved ONE life, ANYWHERE in the world.

 

They are simply fraudulent money spinners for Big Pharma and their white-coat, compromised, pimps.

 

American kids get 80 vaxxes before they reach teens. C'mon man; can't you see the truth?

[cjinchiangrai]

1 hour ago, rumak said:

 

Thanks for sharing that with the AN  forum !

VAERS is a list of public posts complaining of vaccine reactions. It is public, unverified and unvetted. It has no value as a study tool because it is just raw data.

[connda]

1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

Reuters is one of the few unbiased agencies, along with AP. The others one, yes.

When a news media outlet aligns with your own bias, you then consider them "unbiased."

[cjinchiangrai]

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

IMO, no vaccine has EVER saved ONE life, ANYWHERE in the world.

 

They are simply fraudulent money spinners for Big Pharma and their white-coat, compromised, pimps.

 

American kids get 80 vaxxes before they reach teens. C'mon man; can't you see the truth?

Happy to nominate you for the control group in the next vaccine study. They are still working on Ebola.

[fredwiggy]

2 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

IMO, no vaccine has EVER saved ONE life, ANYWHERE in the world.

 

They are simply fraudulent money spinners for Big Pharma and their white-coat, compromised, pimps.

 

American kids get 80 vaxxes before they reach teens. C'mon man; can't you see the truth?

I know the truth, but someone's lying to you. Might want to read this one link before you do another IMO, because you're certainly not up to date on history............https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/history-of-vaccination/history-of-polio-vaccination.

[fredwiggy]

1 minute ago, connda said:

When a news media outlet aligns with your own bias, you then consider them "unbiased."

I don't have bias. I think both sides have problems, and I wait to see the truth when it comes out, which takes time, especially if your candidate is a disturbed narcissist that only has eyes on being God. Anyone that's in power can make good changes, and also bad decisions, based on ego or a lack of knowledge and good backing.

[cjinchiangrai]

9 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

IMO, no vaccine has EVER saved ONE life, ANYWHERE in the world.

 

They are simply fraudulent money spinners for Big Pharma and their white-coat, compromised, pimps.

 

American kids get 80 vaxxes before they reach teens. C'mon man; can't you see the truth?

And what has happened to the child mortality rate because of it? You probably do not "believe" in seatbelts either.

[Red Phoenix]

1 hour ago, rumak said:

1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

Reuters is one of the few unbiased agencies, along with AP.

 

you are absolutely wrong .    but, hopefully (since you believe me on the others)...

 

you will dig a little deeper into those two you doubt me on.  cmon,  you can do it  (Please do not look on google for "fact checks" or truth .......... THEY TOO  win the prize for selective bias !

 

@fredwiggy > I remember an article about a Reuters Fact-check claiming that "Covid-19 Vaccines are not experimental ".   That's a blatant lie, as the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine was only approved by the FDA a couple of months AFTER Reuters made that fact-check claim.

I looked up the well-researched article written by web-developer Stijn de Witt, aptly titled: "Why I don’t trust Reuters".  Here is the link > https://stijndewitt.com/2021/08/26/why-i-dont-trust-reuters/

It's only one of the many instances, where Reuters 'twists' its Fact-Check reports.  So as to provide ammunition to mainstream media to dismiss any facts contrarian to the accepted narrative.

They use a whole range of tactics, e.g. only focusing on one minor detail from a complex event, to dismiss the whole story as non-factual.  But in the example stated Reuters is caught with its pants-down and given the total trust and cloud which they have, never bother to correct their Fact-checks. 

Needless to say that on subjects which I researched well, that I don't trust their fact-checking after having seen too many of such biased fact-check claims.

[fredwiggy]

2 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

@fredwiggy > I remember an article about a Reuters Fact-check claiming that "Covid-19 Vaccines are not experimental ".   That's a blatant lie, as the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine was only approved by the FDA a couple of months AFTER Reuters made that fact-check claim.

I looked up that well-researched article written by web-developer Stijn de Witt, aptly titled: "Why I don’t trust Reuters".  Here is the link > https://stijndewitt.com/2021/08/26/why-i-dont-trust-reuters/

It's only one of the many instances, where Reuters 'twists' its Fact-Check reports.  So as to provide ammunition to mainstream media to dismiss any facts contrarian to the accepted narrative.

They use a whole range of tactics, e.g. only focusing on one minor detail from a complex event, to dismiss the whole story as non-factual.  But in the example stated Reuters is caught with its pants-down and given the total trust and cloud which they have, never bother to correct their Fact-checks. 

You can't say it's one of the many instances when you list only one that's still another's opinion. Reuters has been the go to for te least biased information. It doesn't mean it's perfect as humans work for them. Still, compared to so many that take either side, it's still more factual than most, if not all.

[Peabody]

39 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

But where we disagree, is the flip side of the health coin; toxicity. And IMO, the most damaging toxin around is vaccines. Not just vaxes but medicine generally.

Antibiotics are the #1 reason for the increase in human longevity since 1940

[BritManToo]

7 minutes ago, Peabody said:

Antibiotics are the #1 reason for the increase in human longevity since 1940

Would disagree,

Being well fed, having clean water, and not fighting in the front lines of wars are the game changer.

[cjinchiangrai]

10 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

You can't say it's one of the many instances when you list only one that's still another's opinion. Reuters has been the go to for te least biased information. It doesn't mean it's perfect as humans work for them. Still, compared to so many that take either side, it's still more factual than most, if not all.

Reuters is definitely right leaning but when they state facts they are pretty accurate, unlike Fox.

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

Kennedy's on the ball for sure!  😞

 

Another of Trump's morons now attempting to run the U.S. government, and failing abjectly.

 

RFK Jr. says 20% of health agency layoffs could be mistakes

April 3, 2025

 

"Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggested Thursday that around 20% of the job cuts by the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency will be wrong and need to be corrected. 

 

Around 10,000 employees were laid off from the Department of Health and Human Services on Tuesday, as part of a restructuring architected by Kennedy and Elon Musk's DOGE task force. But Kennedy acknowledged they didn't get everything right the first time.

 

"Personnel that should not have been cut, were cut. We're reinstating them. And that was always the plan. Part of the DOGE, we talked about this from the beginning, is we're going to do 80% cuts, but 20% of those are going to have to be reinstated, because we'll make mistakes," Kennedy said, speaking to reporters at a stop in Virginia."

 

(more)

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rfk-jr-hhs-job-cuts-doge-mistakes/

 

He and his ilk are disgracefully playing with people's lives, both HHS employees, and the Americans and people around the world who depended on and benefited from what had been an expansive U.S. domestic and international public health presence.  Until Trump and Kennedy started dismantling it with axes.

 

 

 

 

[Red Phoenix]

14 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

You can't say it's one of the many instances when you list only one that's still another's opinion. Reuters has been the go to for te least biased information. It doesn't mean it's perfect as humans work for them. Still, compared to so many that take either side, it's still more factual than most, if not all.

I am not going to spend my sunday afternoon looking for more examples of their biased fact-checking. 

Especially since it is obvious from your response that it will be brushed under the table as the odd exception (it is not). 

But the one example I provided is a blatant, easily verificable and deliberate LIE which they presented as a Fact-check. 

I remember that one very well because in threads on the Forum at the time, whenever I correctly stated that the covid-19 vaccines were experimental, my posts were either deleted or dismissed as 'conspiracy nonsense' using the Reuters Fact-check as proof.