Jump to content

Large Cleveland Clinic study shows a +27% increase getting the flu for flu-shot takers


Recommended Posts

Posted

I had an email from Children's Health  Defence in the week highlighting this study.

 

27 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

The Cleveland Clinic is a prestigious medical institution in Ohio. It is consistently ranked as one of the best hospitals in the United States.

 

Not in my book. If a hospital group requires vaxxes, then it is nothing less than a place with quackery tendencies.

 

27 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

It requires regular vaccination for its 54,402 staff, but allows applications for exemptions on medical or religious grounds.

In 2024/25 it mandated the flu vaccine. In all, 43,857 staff (82%) received the vaccine.

 

What is a vaccine actually for? If it is to stop, or lessen, the effects of a specific virus; where is the evidence that the virus exists?

 

I thought the end-game for believing in viruses was coming fast. There was simply too much truth out there. Then I see this nonsense.

 

I'm not really questioning their data findings. What I'm saying, is that the flu is not a disease. Not caused by a virus. Not something that a vaxx can cure. Not something that can be passed from one person to another. 

 

Dear me!!! Getting the flu is a good thing. Think I'll get it touch with this place of quackery, and put them straight.

  • Haha 1
Posted

This post on top of the findings by researchers from Cleveland Clinic that Adults who received a flu shot were 27 percent more likely to get the flu this winter (see Original Post).

Here the link to an article by Steve Kirsch highlighting the findings of 3 more peer-reviewed studies showing that the influenza vaccines do not work, and worse. 

= = =

3 studies show definitively that the influenza vaccines don't work 

But the press still thinks it does. There are record flu deaths in California this year, but they never report on the vaccination status of the people who died. Why not?

image.png.53c9e0ff8aca26bda1a3600969bcf89f.png

 

c80f66e5-de67-4693-bf21-dd2f275f09f3_585x532.webp.c1c12e4950b74df441f093a3d69a5468.webp

 

Executive summary

We’ve known for over 20 years now that flu vaccines don’t work.

So why is the CDC and mainstream media still promoting them?

It’s been confirmed in two other studies since then, one that explicitly used a different method and found exactly the same thing and one paper that accidentally exposed the fraud (they only realized it after I pointed it out).

Still no change.

 

> You can read the full article here: 

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/3-studies-show-definitively-that

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Red Phoenix said:

This post on top of the findings by researchers from Cleveland Clinic that Adults who received a flu shot were 27 percent more likely to get the flu this winter (see Original Post).

Here the link to an article by Steve Kirsch highlighting the findings of 3 more peer-reviewed studies showing that the influenza vaccines do not work, and worse. 

= = =

3 studies show definitively that the influenza vaccines don't work 

But the press still thinks it does. There are record flu deaths in California this year, but they never report on the vaccination status of the people who died. Why not?

image.png.53c9e0ff8aca26bda1a3600969bcf89f.png

 

c80f66e5-de67-4693-bf21-dd2f275f09f3_585x532.webp.c1c12e4950b74df441f093a3d69a5468.webp

 

Executive summary

We’ve known for over 20 years now that flu vaccines don’t work.

So why is the CDC and mainstream media still promoting them?

It’s been confirmed in two other studies since then, one that explicitly used a different method and found exactly the same thing and one paper that accidentally exposed the fraud (they only realized it after I pointed it out).

Still no change.

 

> You can read the full article here: 

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/3-studies-show-definitively-that

 

As much as I applaud Mr Kirsch for getting the facts out there, I can't help thinking that he is tinkering around the edges a fair bit.

 

Ask the question; what are vaccines actually for? It is easy to look that up on the www. Although, the meaning of the word (vaccine), has changed a little in the last 50 years. But, the definitions all revolve around eliminating the effects of; lessening the effects of; protecting others from the effects of,,,. etc,,,etc,,,.

 

Effects of what you might ask!! Of course, it's the elusive virus. Don't yer know! The minute entity, lurking around every corner, waiting to pounce, and render us sick,,,or,,, dead even.

 

Is the world ready for the realisation that pathogenic viruses are a myth? And that myth, has been consistently exaggerated to keep people in poor health, make selected companies rich, and keep white-coats in their very cushy jobs; for 100+ years. It also lets the real polluting baddies off the hook.

 

Let's look at the past 70 years. In 1954, Dr Enders was the first to say he had discovered a virus, that caused the breakdown of healthy tissue. He did an experiment, that ran alongside the proper one - with the puss from a measles pustule - and what happened? The same thing. Both petri dishes saw the tissues broken down. What's more he stated such in the summary.

 

White-coats however, latched onto the new way of finding a virus, and this unscientific, fraudulent process has become the norm.

 

The truth; a virus has never been isolated in a scientific manner; and crucially, never been shown to cause sickness. How could it? It don't exist.

 

No virus = no need for a vaccine.

 

The scientific medical world needs to face a huge truth. It is itself a unscientific fraud.

 

Hope Mr Kirsch reads this.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...