Jump to content

Nestlé Brews Up Battle in Thai Coffee Market Amid Legal Dispute


Recommended Posts

Posted

Good for Nestlé, these Thai oligarchs are worse than the Russian ones! Who knows, with them out of the picture maybe the price of a jar of coffee will come down a bit.

Posted
1 hour ago, PJUK88 said:

Disgusting product. Calling it coffee is a slander to real coffee.

Absolutely, taking a natural product and processing the hell out of it and calling it coffee...

Posted
1 hour ago, Jonathan Swift said:

I don't know how wide a variation there is, but all of the Thai coffee I've ever drunk has been fabulous. I'm drinking my triple latte as I sit here. 

Apart from Amazon, which has reasonable to good coffee, I otherwise have no positive experience with Thai coffee.

Posted
5 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Over priced and over here...

I used to buy Nestle "Red Cup" but switched to Moccona about 15 years ago; I highly recommend it: both 3-in-1 or alternatively the 190 gram jar of Moccona Select - just coffee (190 baht I think - half the price of Nestle).

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, CallumWK said:

I have no horse in the game, but I have avoided any Nestle product for as long as I remember, and especially since the CEO of Nestle Mr Brabeck-Letmathe said that “access to water is not a public right”

 

 

Exactly! Nestlé is one of the worst companies on the planet. 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 hour ago, safarimike11 said:

I used to buy Nestle "Red Cup" but switched to Moccona about 15 years ago; I highly recommend it: both 3-in-1 or alternatively the 190 gram jar of Moccona Select - just coffee (190 baht I think - half the price of Nestle).

None of it is "coffee ” ... 🤮 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, pacovl46 said:

Exactly! Nestlé is one of the worst companies on the planet. 

 

I had forgotten how nefarious they have been.   

 

I'm almost rooting for the powerful Thai families on this one.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Chongalulu said:

None of it is "coffee ” ... 🤮 

Don’t bet me wrong here as I am not a coffee addict and only drink "instant" (Moccona espresso at the moment) but you reminded me of a visit to a coffee plantation in NSW, Australia. An area not known for its quality of coffee but he owner went on a diatribe about instant not being coffee. So ever since then I have believed what she said but could not get into the Yuppie coffee scene.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, portisaacozzy said:

 

love Camp coffee,it tastes like British coffee should

I didn't realise they still made it - I remember drinking it as a kid 70+ years ago!

Posted
On 4/23/2025 at 4:31 PM, snoop1130 said:

The court prohibited Nestlé from producing or distributing its famed instant coffee under the Nescafé brand

 

I'd argue that not having access to this "famed" yet shoddy instant coffee isn't a big loss! :sick:

Posted
9 hours ago, PJUK88 said:

Disgusting product. Calling it coffee is a slander to real coffee.

Absolutely agree. Nestle don't make coffee. They make an Instant/freeze-dried drink that they call coffee. If you don't want the hassle of making real coffee the dutch company Douwe Egberts make a much better alternative called Moccona. 

Posted
On 4/23/2025 at 3:34 AM, Will B Good said:

Don't like coffee, but going to start drinking Nestle now.

Maybe time to leave Thailand if your seemingly so anti Thai.

Nestle is a giant conglomerate.

Support your local businesses.

Let alone their coffee isn’t fit to drink. Thai coffee ️ is not so bad. 

Posted
6 hours ago, pacovl46 said:

Exactly! Nestlé is one of the worst companies on the planet. 

Possibly the worst. With a Globalist leader who just became the head of WEF the previous leader is indicted.

Posted

George published this story back on the 14th of this month. So this is a new link.

 

I asked this below back then, but didn't get a reply. (Anyone know if this below is a correct assumption? I really don't know if it's a one-off victory for foreign corporations or a real game-changer.)

 

From the earlier thread I asked:

 

'Does this upend the Thai business model of insisting a foreign company must have a local Thai partner to do business in Thailand? So many foreign brands have been burned in the past through failed partnerships (think Carlesberg Beer among others). If a global brand no longer needs a local Thai partner (or 'Thai franchisee with nationwide marketing rights and profit sharing'), then that's huge news... right? Or am I reading too much into the court ruling (if so, why so?).'

 

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...