Jump to content

Trump Administration Halts New Student Visa Interviews Amid Social Media Vetting Push


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Trump Administration Halts New Student Visa Interviews Amid Social Media Vetting Push

 

The Trump administration has moved to suspend new student visa interviews at U.S. embassies and consulates around the world, signaling a significant escalation in its efforts to scrutinize international students. This decision comes as part of preparations to expand mandatory social media vetting for all foreign applicants seeking to study in the United States, according to a government cable obtained by POLITICO.

 

The cable, dated Tuesday and signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, directs consular officials to freeze scheduling new appointments for student and exchange visitor visas, known as F, M, and J categories. “Effective immediately, in preparation for an expansion of required social media screening and vetting, consular sections should not add any additional student or exchange visitor (F, M, and J) visa appointment capacity until further guidance is issued septel, which we anticipate in the coming days,” the cable states. “Septel” is State Department jargon for “separate telegram.”

 

This development is the latest in a string of moves that appear to target universities, many of which rely heavily on tuition from international students. While some level of social media screening had already been implemented, it was primarily directed at students suspected of participating in protests against Israel’s military operations in Gaza.

 

Although the cable does not provide explicit details about what the expanded social media screening will entail, it references executive orders intended to combat terrorism and antisemitism. That has left many within the State Department uncertain about how to interpret and implement the new rules. One lingering concern is the ambiguity over what type of online behavior might trigger scrutiny. For instance, some officials are unsure whether a student sharing a photo of a Palestinian flag on social media could prompt additional vetting or potential denial of a visa.

 

“There has been vague guidance for months,” a department official told POLITICO, speaking on condition of anonymity. The lack of clarity has fueled confusion among consular staff, who are tasked with making critical decisions on visa eligibility with few clear parameters.

 

The administration’s broader approach appears to be targeting academic institutions it views as hostile to its agenda. Elite universities such as Harvard have been criticized by the Trump team for what it perceives as a tolerance of antisemitism and excessive political activism. In tandem, sweeping immigration enforcement efforts have ensnared many international students, contributing to what critics see as a hostile environment for foreign academics and researchers.

 

This policy shift could have serious consequences for American universities, which depend not only on the tuition and fees paid by international students but also on their contributions to research and campus diversity. The uncertainty surrounding student visa processing adds to the challenges already facing these institutions, many of which are still navigating the aftershocks of the COVID-19 pandemic and changing global perceptions of the U.S. as a welcoming destination for education.

 

Officials at the State Department did not respond to requests for comment, leaving universities and prospective students in limbo as they await further clarification on the administration’s plans.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Politico  2025-05-29

 

 

newsletter-banner-1.png

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted

That’s out trump trying to control how people think and making sure the schools don’t allow any critical thinking…surprised anyone?we have seen these actions in the past take heed!!

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 8
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, thesetat said:

Not a very realistic view of the OP here. This has nothing to do with critical thinking or controlling how people think. 

This is simply about trying to prevent the students who use the University and College to promote hate and violence and anit-semitism. 

@Tug you need to stop twisting OPs to your anti-Trump agenda.  

Free and critical thinking are nessary in a free society it’s just another intimidation tactic and it’s damaging.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 3
  • Thumbs Down 6
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, thesetat said:

but this is not about suppressing that.. you are just using it to promote your anti-Trump hate

My defense of democracy and our constitution…there ya go fixed it for you.

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 8
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Not very intelligent, but not surprising.

There are 1.1 million foreign students in the USA. They contribute an estimated $44 billion to the economy. 

The student fees can be well in excess of $20,000 per annum and those inflated fees subsidize the education of US  citizens.Add to that their living expenses and slumlords and  real estate  entrepreneurs who exploit students would take a hit.

 

The data from IIE  shows that;

- The majority of students studied in the STEM fields (56%) with one in four (25%) studying math and computer science, while nearly one in five (19%) studied engineering.

- Business and management (14 %), physical and life sciences (8%), social sciences (8%), and the fine and applied arts (5%).

 

This is the opposite of what US nationals are studying with physed, polysci, sociology, gender studies etc. being more popular than STEM. The USA has a desperate shortage of people who are educated in the applied sciences, so it will be interesting to see how Trump and friends intend to remedy that problem.

 

I am all for screening prospective visa holders, but the measure here is a draconian punishment of the universities for refusing to  go along with the petty campaign of reversing  DEI initiatives.

  • Thumbs Up 3
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, thesetat said:

Not a very realistic view of the OP here. This has nothing to do with critical thinking or controlling how people think. 

This is simply about trying to prevent the students who use the University and College to promote hate and violence and anit-semitism. 

@Tug you need to stop twisting OPs to your anti-Trump agenda.  

That assumes the aims stated by the habitual liar Trump are the actual aims.

 

 

  • Agree 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 5
Posted

How do you build a better and a stronger nation? You succumb to irrational fear, and deny the best and the brightest from around the world. 

 

Trump is a man of such ignorance it defies the rational imagination. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 3
  • Thumbs Down 7
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Tug said:

That’s out trump trying to control how people think and making sure the schools don’t allow any critical thinking…surprised anyone?we have seen these actions in the past take heed!!

Critical thinking?  Do you know how to think at all?  

  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Explain to me why it’s a bad thing that some foreign graduates of Ivy League universities who predominantly study STEM programs remain in the U.S. after their graduation, often with Masters/PhD degrees?

 

 

 

Depends if they are pro hamas. Thats why future americans will forego college as parents would rather their kids be stupid than brainwashed

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Explain to me why it’s a bad thing that some foreign graduates of Ivy League universities who predominantly study STEM programs remain in the U.S. after their graduation, often with Masters/PhD degrees?

 

 

 

Now chomper you are replying to a rabid trump supporter they aren’t known for critical nor deep thinking.they couldn’t possibly think past the thought of a foreign person….could possibly offer anything no matter that they might be the worlds brightest.sad really.just blind obedience to their orange master.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 6
  • Haha 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Explain to me why it’s a bad thing that some foreign graduates of Ivy League universities who predominantly study STEM programs remain in the U.S. after their graduation, often with Masters/PhD degrees?

Those arent the ones anyone is talking about. If they are in STEM, chances are they are too busy studying to be hating America

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Let me know when else I can correct your lies and deranged view of the world.


So let’s put that to the test:

 

9 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Those arent the ones anyone is talking about. If they are in STEM, chances are they are too busy studying to be hating America


If ‘those [STEM students] aren’t the one’s anyone is talking about’ does the halt to new student visa interviews  and social 

media vetting exclude applicants to STEM program?

 

Or is your claim nobody is talking about those [STEM] students a fabrication of your own misunderstanding of what the Trump administration are doing?

 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Tug said:

Free and critical thinking

Does not exist for America hating folks who spew Socialist propaganda. No Socialist can ever think freely and critically.

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Does not exist for America hating folks who spew Socialist propaganda. No Socialist can ever think freely and critically.

Wow, truly profound statement from someone who don't understand the core principles of socialism. Free thinking and critical reflection are rooted in socialism desire for a more equitable and just society. 

  • Thumbs Up 3
  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Watawattana said:

But I'm not seeing a big downside except for the delays it might introduce, budget uncertainty for many universities and probably many students blocked when they shouldn't be.

Duh? That seems like a pretty big downside to me.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Duh? That seems like a pretty big downside to me.

Yeah, I agree.  That's why I stated "I'm not seeing a big downside except for...".  Which means in the English language that I see the items I then listed as big downsides.  A bit too difficult for you was it?

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Free thinking and critical reflection are rooted in socialism desire for a more equitable and just society. 

Socialism is responsible for more mass murders than any ideology in human history.

 

Thats because those free thinkers might not think the way the Socialists want.

 

Let me know if they have freedom of speech in Cuba, or China. How many critical thinkers ended up in Dachau?

 

Your spew of Socialist word salad doesnt change the fact that the face of your movement is General Blokhin putting Walther 6.35mm pistols on the back of the heads of Polish free thinkers, or Hoess peeping through the spyhole in the gas chamber to watch the enemies of National Socialism scream and choke.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Socialism is responsible for more mass murders than any ideology in human history.

 

Thats because those free thinkers might not think the way the Socialists want.

 

Let me know if they have freedom of speech in Cuba, or China. How many critical thinkers ended up in Dachau?

 

Your spew of Socialist word salad doesnt change the fact that the face of your movement is General Blokhin putting Walther 6.35mm pistols on the back of the heads of Polish free thinkers, or Hoess peeping through the spyhole in the gas chamber to watch the enemies of National Socialism scream and choke.

12 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Socialism is responsible for more mass murders than any ideology in human history.

 

Thats because those free thinkers might not think the way the Socialists want.

 

Let me know if they have freedom of speech in Cuba, or China. How many critical thinkers ended up in Dachau?

 

Your spew of Socialist word salad doesnt change the fact that the face of your movement is General Blokhin putting Walther 6.35mm pistols on the back of the heads of Polish free thinkers, or Hoess peeping through the spyhole in the gas chamber to watch the enemies of National Socialism scream and choke.

Difficult to discuss when you mixed up communism and socialism and don't understand different form of socialism and it's off topic. Let this rest. 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      President Marcos Signs Capital Markets Efficiency Promotion Act into Law

    2. 36

      What is the ‘TACO trade’ on Wall Street?

    3. 27

      Fathers Shoot Drug-Crazed Sons in Two Separate Incidents

    4. 36

      What is the ‘TACO trade’ on Wall Street?

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...