Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My partner and I are both retired and are contemplating moving from the UK to Thailand possibly in around 12 months time and we are heading over at the beginning of next year to do a bit more boots-on-the-ground research.
I've done a lot of reading about visas and would most likely apply for non-immigrant O visas here in the UK ahead of relocating but I have a couple of questions regarding finances.
We both have eSIPP pensions alongside stocks and shares ISAs maintained by an investment company here in the UK. I understand that if we opt for showing a lump sum to satisfy the financial requirements we'd both need to move around £18000 into bank accounts ahead of any visa application this end and then show it as 800,000 baht in Thai accounts ahead of applying for a visa extension at the end of the initial 90 days but does it matter what type of account we opened? Is it possible to put it in savings accounts that accrue interest or does it have to go into current accounts where it would effectively lose value due to inflation?
We've also considered the 65,000 baht per month regular income option to satisfy financial requirements but are unsure how this would work. For our part we could arrange for the GBP equivalent to be deposited regularly into our UK accounts and then transfer to our Thai accounts on the same date each month but how would we prove it as regular income when applying for the visa extension as we would only be able to show probably 2 months of transactions after setting up Thai accounts?
I've assumed that the regular income option would be advantageous in that we could spend the money used to prove our finances rather than having to leave it dormant in a bank account but would appreciate some advice.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Smudgy said:

Is it possible to put it in savings accounts that accrue interest or does it have to go into current accounts where it would effectively lose value due to inflation?

The interest rates are so low it makes very little difference.  You don't want a "current" account in any case, everybody has a savings account.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Upnotover said:

You can't do that for the first year/extension.  Maybe the second if that suits.

 

Thank you for that. I didn't realise you couldn't do it for the first year.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Smudgy said:

My partner and I are both retired and are contemplating moving from the UK to Thailand possibly in around 12 months time and we are heading over at the beginning of next year to do a bit more boots-on-the-ground research.

Assume you ain't married.

The income method won't work for first extension.

Nor will joint bank account.

Can you each tie up 800k in a Thai bank account.

Assume currently you do not have Thai bank accounts.

Have you looked at DTV

 

No offense however you seem naive.

How much time have you spent in Thailand previously 

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, DrJack54 said:

Assume you ain't married.

The income method won't work for first extension.

Nor will joint bank account.

Can you each tie up 800k in a Thai bank account.

Assume currently you do not have Thai bank accounts.

Have you looked at DTV

 

No not married but would do it if it simplified matters. No Thai accounts as yet but tying up 800k wouldn't be a problem especially if we switched to regular income for the second year.

I only found out about the DTV a few days ago and I'd certainly consider it as a plan B if necessary and I could obtain the necessary documents.

 

I am naive as far as relocating is concerned but I've been to Thailand on several holidays and spent 2 months there earlier this year which is when we starting seriously thinking about living there.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Smudgy said:

No not married but would do it if it simplified matters.

Assume your partner is Non Thai.

In that case best to do individual Non O applications. 

You could also consider use of agents.

Depends on long term plan 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, DrJack54 said:

In that case best to do individual Non O applications.

 

Plus separate retirement extensions in due course IMHO if funds aren't an issue for them. Strikes me as potentially less messy than having one piggy-back on to the other as his/her dependant.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

From what I've understood so far there doesn't seem any real advantage to getting visas as a British married couple so I think we'd apply individually and keep our finances separate as well.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, OJAS said:

. Strikes me as potentially less messy than having one piggy-back on to the other as his/her dependant

Turns out not married so the piggyback option not on. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Smudgy said:

From what I've understood so far there doesn't seem any real advantage to getting visas as a British married couple so I think we'd apply individually and keep our finances separate as well.

Best idea to obtain visa + extensions as individuals. 

Obtain the Non O e-Visa in the UK. 

Do not come to Thailand visa, exempt as opening bank accounts would be very difficult.. 

As pointed out you could use income method in the second year. 

You would need to follow the financial requirements for money in bank method in first year and simultaneously deposit 65k each into Thai bank account.

In that way for second extension you can each show 12 monthly transfers. 

That's a LOT of income (too much) 

You may decide just to use money in bank method however that's lot of capital to tie up. 

 

If you ever were to marry and if your income/assets satisfy the requirements you could consider a LTR visa. 

Spouse can stay in Thailand (no financials) if you have that visa. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

We'd definitely organise the O visas back here in the UK then get bank accounts opened as soon as possible after arriving in Thailand as I understand it can be problematic.

 

The financial requirements of the LTR would be too high for us but the 800k or regular 65k would be ok. I can see that leaving 800k untouched is the simplest method but obviously we'd need money besides that to live on so if we transferred 65k each every month, even though it may be in excess of what we actually spend, it would at least then give us the option for future renewals and, if not needed for anything, we could transfer the original 800k back to our UK accounts. Having read a bit further into it though I think we'd probably just leave the 800k in the bank.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Smudgy said:

....but the 800k or regular 65k would be ok. I can see that leaving 800k untouched is the simplest method but obviously we'd need money besides that to live on so if we transferred 65k each every month, even though it may be in excess of what we actually spend

Slightly confused. 

Of course you mean 800k each in bank account in your name only. 

You are obtaining 2 separate Non O + subsequent extensions. 

If one of you could transfer the 65k per month then that person could use income method. 

Both doing income method is bit of overkill. 

We all have own particular life styles but for two people with total of 130k per month is on upper side. 

FWIW: I transfer approx 110k baht per month for the two of us. 

The way you outlined the transfers in your OP is correct. 

I transfer 14th of every month from my Oz online bank app using WISE. 

 

In your situation some would suggest using an agent..

1.6mil for a couple tied up in Thai bank with minimal interest is not nice. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, DrJack54 said:

Slightly confused. 

Of course you mean 800k each in bank account in your name only. 

You are obtaining 2 separate Non O + subsequent extensions. 

If one of you could transfer the 65k per month then that person could use income method. 

Both doing income method is bit of overkill. 

We all have own particular life styles but for two people with total of 130k per month is on upper side. 

FWIW: I transfer approx 110k baht per month for the two of us. 

The way you outlined the transfers in your OP is correct. 

I transfer 14th of every month from my Oz online bank app using WISE. 

 

In your situation some would suggest using an agent..

1.6mil for a couple tied up in Thai bank with minimal interest is not nice. 

What I thought was both of us would need to open Thai accounts at the earliest opportunity then transfer 800k into each of them ready for our first renewals but what you suggest is one of us leave 800k untouched in their account whilst the other utilises the 65k income method? 

 

At what point might it be worth using an agent and how do they alleviate the need for keeping money in the bank? 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Smudgy said:

At what point might it be worth using an agent and how do they alleviate the need for keeping money in the bank?

 

You could do it for the first extension.  You pay the agent, they pay off immigration.  Costs you more than the real cost, 25k(?) against 2k baht each per year, but you can make more than that in interest on the 800k x 2 you didn't have to deposit. 

 

However, personally, if you are not skint I'd do it properly.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Upnotover said:

 

You could do it for the first extension.  You pay the agent, they pay off immigration.  Costs you more than the real cost, 25k(?) against 2k baht each per year, but you can make more than that in interest on the 800k x 2 you didn't have to deposit. 

 

However, personally, if you are not skint I'd do it properly.

At the moment, leaving the equivalent of 1.6m in a decent UK savings account would be worth around 64k so it's an avenue that could be worth exploring if it made the process simpler more than anything

Posted
On 6/5/2025 at 8:20 PM, Smudgy said:

My partner and I are both retired and are contemplating moving from the UK to Thailand possibly in around 12 months time and we are heading over at the beginning of next year to do a bit more boots-on-the-ground research.
I've done a lot of reading about visas and would most likely apply for non-immigrant O visas here in the UK ahead of relocating but I have a couple of questions regarding finances.
We both have eSIPP pensions alongside stocks and shares ISAs maintained by an investment company here in the UK. I understand that if we opt for showing a lump sum to satisfy the financial requirements we'd both need to move around £18000 into bank accounts ahead of any visa application this end and then show it as 800,000 baht in Thai accounts ahead of applying for a visa extension at the end of the initial 90 days but does it matter what type of account we opened? Is it possible to put it in savings accounts that accrue interest or does it have to go into current accounts where it would effectively lose value due to inflation?
We've also considered the 65,000 baht per month regular income option to satisfy financial requirements but are unsure how this would work. For our part we could arrange for the GBP equivalent to be deposited regularly into our UK accounts and then transfer to our Thai accounts on the same date each month but how would we prove it as regular income when applying for the visa extension as we would only be able to show probably 2 months of transactions after setting up Thai accounts?
I've assumed that the regular income option would be advantageous in that we could spend the money used to prove our finances rather than having to leave it dormant in a bank account but would appreciate some advice.

I've used both methods. Now I use the THB 65k+/month option.

I'd think you'd first have to have the THB 800k in the bank to qualify for your visa. After that, the next year, you could use the THB 65k+/month deposit.

Posted
On 6/5/2025 at 3:20 PM, Smudgy said:

Is it possible to put it in savings accounts that accrue interest or does it have to go into current accounts where it would effectively lose value due to inflation?
We've also considered the 65,000 baht per month regular income option to satisfy financial requirements but are unsure how this would work.

The best option in my opinion is to use the 800k baht in banl deposit-method. You can use a 12-month fixed account for best interest, which at the moment is in the area around 1.5 % p.a. minus 15% withheld tax. Inflation – consumer price index – is low at present, 100.40 for May 2025 with 2023 as index 100.

 

image.png.9a0c91fcf019ad0f40348adcd238d40e.png

 

With a fixed bank deposit you can sleep well without thinking of exchange rate and that you got transferred equivalent to minimum 65k baht every month.

 

I've used the deposit-mothod since 2007 and withdraw the interest once a year, so I keep clean 800k baht in the account. Use a separate account for immigration-deposit, so it's siomple and easy to prove the balance. You'll once a year need an balance confirmation letter from your bank together with a 3-month statement (typically 200 baht cost, valid for 7 days) nand copy of (all pages) on your bankbook, which also need to be updated, often same day or day before applying for extension of stay.

 

When using the 65k baht a month foreign transfer method, you still need a bank letter, but also 12-month bank statement; which need to be ordered in advance at some banks, for example Bangkok Bank. Your transfers shall be monthly and never less than 65k baht.

Posted

"You'll once a year need an balance confirmation letter from your bank together with a 3-month statement (typically 200 baht cost, valid for 7 days) and copy of (all pages) on your bankbook, which also need to be updated, often same day or day before applying for extension of stay."

 

Procedure may be different, depending on the Immigration Office.

 

At Jomtien, if you have the 800 000 baht in an FDA. the procedure is as follows:

 

1. Deposit 100 baht in the FDA.

2. Request the bank to update your bank book.

3. Request a letter stating that you are the holder of the account and how much is in it. (Cost: 200 baht.)

4. Request a 12-month statement. (Cost: 200 baht.)

5. If you are applying for an Extension of Stay yourself, you will need to copy every page of your bank book. 

6. If you are using an agent #5 is not necessary.

 

Source: Recent personal experience.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Goethe said:

At Jomtien, if you have the 800 000 baht in an FDA. the procedure is as follows:

Don't think that's the OP issue. 

Fact is he is asking about bank method for himself and also partner. 

That's locking up 1.6mil at minimal interest rates. 

The opportunity cost on that would be possibly 100k baht. 

For second extension for both to move to income method would mean transferring 130k + per month. 

Most likely much more that they require

That's the dilemma. 

Posted
On 6/6/2025 at 4:35 AM, Smudgy said:

From what I've understood so far there doesn't seem any real advantage to getting visas as a British married couple so I think we'd apply individually and keep our finances separate as well.


Having come here with a spouse, keep your finances separate. That way they have access to funds should something happen to you

Posted
35 minutes ago, SLOWHAND225 said:


Having come here with a spouse, keep your finances separate. That way they have access to funds should something happen to you

The OP and partner are not married. 

That rules out "piggyback" (dependant). 

They require separate non O retirement + extensions. 

Hence separate finances. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, DrJack54 said:

The OP and partner are not married. 

That rules out "piggyback" (dependant). 

They require separate non O retirement + extensions. 

Hence separate finances. 


Yes, I'm aware of that. 
OP made the comment about being married and finances,  hence my comment about finances and and not about anything else.

Posted

I have a request. Can I start with the 800K and later turn over to 65K a month? I find the 800K deposit rather dumb, as I would really like to spend my cash as I like! I soon cannot have a new income proof from Emabassy as they are about to close that option. I would like to know how to easily slide over to the above mentioned methodes. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, harryviking said:

I have a request. Can I start with the 800K and later turn over to 65K a month? I find the 800K deposit rather dumb, as I would really like to spend my cash as I like! I soon cannot have a new income proof from Emabassy as they are about to close that option. I would like to know how to easily slide over to the above mentioned methodes. 

First up yes you can change from using money in bank to income method. 

You generally need to run both methods at the same time. 

I'm doing that now. 

Maintaining money in bank requirements and doing monthly transfers. 

For my next extension I will show compliance with funds in bank and 12+ transfers to make the change. 

 

For folk where embassies stop the letters (eg Canada) it will depend on how much notice is gi en along with immigration flexibility. 

 

 

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, DrJack54 said:

For my next extension I will show compliance with funds in bank and 12+ transfers to make the change. 

Combination Method is, for me, 420k in bank and 35k per month into a separate account, which I then transfer to our Joint spending account.

Can always WISE more to that account if needed, but IO does not need to see that account.

At Extension time, I show two bank books, one with 420k not touched, and the other with only 12 in/outs = one page.

Works for me here in P'lok.

Posted
20 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

Works for me here in P'lok.

Should work anywhere. 

I was replying to guy who wants to change to income method doing 65k transfers. 

Combo method is an option however suggest that most people would require the 65k/month.

Bonus is nothing ever tied up in Thai bank upon passing. 

Posted

I like the money in the bank method, and while the interest is low, the interest in the US is not great, and the account is something of a hedge against the dollar and it's nice to have money in the country in the event of an emergency. 

 

I'm getting around 4% in US fixed accounts, and about 1.5% here, so on 100,000, that's a 2,500 loss. 

 

In the last year, the B/$ has gone from 36.78 to 32.65, which is a change of about 12.6%. 

 

So, it's actually a gain of 10,100

 

I suggest that when you set up your bank accounts, get two for each of you at the same time. It is no more difficult and does not take any longer to set up two than one. 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...