Popular Post Social Media Posted Monday at 09:03 PM Popular Post Posted Monday at 09:03 PM ITV is under fire for allegedly censoring tennis legend Martina Navratilova and numerous other users after they commented on the biological sex of boxer Imane Khelif. The controversy erupted after World Boxing banned Khelif from participating in women’s boxing due to a leaked blood test revealing the athlete has XY chromosomes, typically associated with biological males. The backlash began when ITV shared a story on its social media account X (formerly Twitter) reporting that naming Khelif had caused “immeasurable psychological damage,” a claim made by the Algerian Boxing Federation following World Boxing’s decision to name the athlete publicly. In response, Martina Navratilova, a nine-time Wimbledon singles champion and long-time LGBTQ+ rights advocate, posted: “But a male beating the crap out of women is not too bad, apparently.” ITV initially hid her comment from view, only reinstating it after users criticized the move. While Navratilova's comment eventually returned to public view, dozens of other remarks remained hidden, many of which simply stated that Khelif is male. Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at the women’s rights organization Sex Matters, demanded accountability from ITV. “It’s shocking that the UK’s largest commercial broadcast network has censored hundreds of gender-critical comments on social media, many of them simply referring to Imane Khelif as male,” she said. “Hiding a simple truth about a major news story is a remarkable failure by a journalistic organisation.” McAnena also expressed disbelief that a figure as prominent as Navratilova was targeted. “It’s scandalous that ITV hid a reply from tennis legend Martina Navratilova, which they reinstated after an outcry. But what of the hundreds of other replies that remain censored, some of which do nothing but quote JK Rowling about the boxing row?” she continued. “ITV cannot simply dismiss this as a social media storm. Unless ITV’s leadership apologises for hiding factual comments from the public, it will damage its credibility as a respected news organisation.” The controversy traces back to last year’s Olympic Games, where Khelif won a gold medal in the women’s boxing event. The boxer had previously been disqualified from the 2023 World Championships after testing suggested the presence of male chromosomes. Most recently, World Boxing banned Khelif from competing in the Eindhoven World Cup unless a sex test was taken, which Khelif refused. X allows users to hide replies they dislike, preventing them from appearing automatically on the platform. However, these comments are not deleted and can still be viewed by those who choose to dig into the hidden replies. Among the many hidden responses were statements that strongly criticized Khelif’s participation in women’s sports. One user, Hatkeshiator, commented: “It’s hardly worse than pretending to be a chick so you can beat chicks up while they fear a ban if they complain. Get a grip.” Another, Kyle Reese, wrote: “I think the damage his mentally-ill man inflicted on women was far greater.” Florence Jeffries added: “He punches women. What about the harm, physical and mental, suffered by them? He knows tests have shown him to have XY chromosomes.” The growing debate continues to draw attention to questions of fairness, transparency, and the role of media in reporting biological and gender-related facts in elite sports. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph 2025-06-10 2 1 1
Popular Post Homburg Posted Tuesday at 06:50 AM Popular Post Posted Tuesday at 06:50 AM ITV trying to match BBC? 5 2 1
Popular Post Photoguy21 Posted Tuesday at 06:56 AM Popular Post Posted Tuesday at 06:56 AM He is a male. He can call himself what he likes that is fine but the reality is he is not a she. 7 4 1 2
Popular Post roquefort Posted Tuesday at 06:57 AM Popular Post Posted Tuesday at 06:57 AM "fairness, transparency" in the British media? You're havin' a laugh. Censorship reigns supreme. This story is just one minor example. 4 4 2 1
Popular Post jesimps Posted Tuesday at 09:53 AM Popular Post Posted Tuesday at 09:53 AM 12 hours ago, Social Media said: ITV is under fire for allegedly censoring tennis legend Martina Navratilova and numerous other users after they commented on the biological sex of boxer Imane Khelif. The controversy erupted after World Boxing banned Khelif from participating in women’s boxing due to a leaked blood test revealing the athlete has XY chromosomes, typically associated with biological males. The backlash began when ITV shared a story on its social media account X (formerly Twitter) reporting that naming Khelif had caused “immeasurable psychological damage,” a claim made by the Algerian Boxing Federation following World Boxing’s decision to name the athlete publicly. In response, Martina Navratilova, a nine-time Wimbledon singles champion and long-time LGBTQ+ rights advocate, posted: “But a male beating the crap out of women is not too bad, apparently.” ITV initially hid her comment from view, only reinstating it after users criticized the move. While Navratilova's comment eventually returned to public view, dozens of other remarks remained hidden, many of which simply stated that Khelif is male. Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at the women’s rights organization Sex Matters, demanded accountability from ITV. “It’s shocking that the UK’s largest commercial broadcast network has censored hundreds of gender-critical comments on social media, many of them simply referring to Imane Khelif as male,” she said. “Hiding a simple truth about a major news story is a remarkable failure by a journalistic organisation.” McAnena also expressed disbelief that a figure as prominent as Navratilova was targeted. “It’s scandalous that ITV hid a reply from tennis legend Martina Navratilova, which they reinstated after an outcry. But what of the hundreds of other replies that remain censored, some of which do nothing but quote JK Rowling about the boxing row?” she continued. “ITV cannot simply dismiss this as a social media storm. Unless ITV’s leadership apologises for hiding factual comments from the public, it will damage its credibility as a respected news organisation.” The controversy traces back to last year’s Olympic Games, where Khelif won a gold medal in the women’s boxing event. The boxer had previously been disqualified from the 2023 World Championships after testing suggested the presence of male chromosomes. Most recently, World Boxing banned Khelif from competing in the Eindhoven World Cup unless a sex test was taken, which Khelif refused. X allows users to hide replies they dislike, preventing them from appearing automatically on the platform. However, these comments are not deleted and can still be viewed by those who choose to dig into the hidden replies. Among the many hidden responses were statements that strongly criticized Khelif’s participation in women’s sports. One user, Hatkeshiator, commented: “It’s hardly worse than pretending to be a chick so you can beat chicks up while they fear a ban if they complain. Get a grip.” Another, Kyle Reese, wrote: “I think the damage his mentally-ill man inflicted on women was far greater.” Florence Jeffries added: “He punches women. What about the harm, physical and mental, suffered by them? He knows tests have shown him to have XY chromosomes.” The growing debate continues to draw attention to questions of fairness, transparency, and the role of media in reporting biological and gender-related facts in elite sports. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph 2025-06-10 Ask any red-blooded male if they'd like to take Imane for a romantic candlelit dinner, followed by a slow hand in hand stroll through the park. Their replies should be a good acid test. 2 1
Popular Post connda Posted Tuesday at 10:06 AM Popular Post Posted Tuesday at 10:06 AM Allowing biological males to compete in martial arts like boxing is insane and a danger to women. This chicks-with-dicks-are-really-chicks nonsense has got to stop before some women or girl is killed. 3 1 1
connda Posted Tuesday at 10:07 AM Posted Tuesday at 10:07 AM 13 minutes ago, jesimps said: Ask any red-blooded male if they'd like to take Imane for a romantic candlelit dinner, followed by a slow hand in hand stroll through the park. Their replies should be a good acid test. Dude's got bigger biceps then I had back in the day. 1
Popular Post Nick Carter icp Posted Tuesday at 10:19 AM Popular Post Posted Tuesday at 10:19 AM 12 minutes ago, connda said: Dude's got bigger biceps then I had back in the day. Probably got a bigger knob as well 1 7
thesetat Posted Tuesday at 06:26 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:26 PM 8 hours ago, jesimps said: Ask any red-blooded male if they'd like to take Imane for a romantic candlelit dinner, followed by a slow hand in hand stroll through the park. Their replies should be a good acid test. Since this is a Thailand forum, I am sure you will find many men who would gladly do as you described. haha... 8 hours ago, connda said: Allowing biological males to compete in martial arts like boxing is insane and a danger to women. This chicks-with-dicks-are-really-chicks nonsense has got to stop before some women or girl is killed. I agree wholeheartedly! 1
WDSmart Posted Wednesday at 03:56 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:56 AM I suggest (AGAIN!) that if there are only two categories of activities, one for males and one for females, whoever runs the operations should define how they determine gender. Is it just taking the contestant's word for it? Do they require a birth certificate showing gender? If a test is required, is it: a physical examination? chromosomes? hormones? some combination of the three above? And if it is, how do they reconcile a different outcome of some of the above, like XXY chromosomes, or XY chromosomes, with a hormonal level indicating female? Just how do they determine the gender of a participant?
impulse Posted Wednesday at 10:49 AM Posted Wednesday at 10:49 AM On 6/10/2025 at 5:03 AM, Social Media said: due to a leaked blood test revealing the athlete has XY chromosomes, typically associated with biological males. Gotta love the way they're hedging it. Typically associated with... It's more like a defining characteristic. Or at least it was from the time they discovered chromosomes. 2
Popular Post JonnyF Posted Wednesday at 12:31 PM Popular Post Posted Wednesday at 12:31 PM 1 hour ago, impulse said: Gotta love the way they're hedging it. Typically associated with... It's more like a defining characteristic. Or at least it was from the time they discovered chromosomes. Indeed. But we have to remember that the left are always very selective about which science they follow, and invariably get it wrong. 2 1 1
Lancelot01 Posted Wednesday at 03:03 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:03 PM 11 hours ago, WDSmart said: I suggest (AGAIN!) that if there are only two categories of activities, one for males and one for females, whoever runs the operations should define how they determine gender. Is it just taking the contestant's word for it? Do they require a birth certificate showing gender? If a test is required, is it: a physical examination? chromosomes? hormones? some combination of the three above? And if it is, how do they reconcile a different outcome of some of the above, like XXY chromosomes, or XY chromosomes, with a hormonal level indicating female? Just how do they determine the gender of a participant? Thee mean meat and two veg method? 11 hours ago, WDSmart said: I suggest (AGAIN!) that if there are only two categories of activities, one for males and one for females, whoever runs the operations should define how they determine gender. Is it just taking the contestant's word for it? Do they require a birth certificate showing gender? If a test is required, is it: a physical examination? chromosomes? hormones? some combination of the three above? And if it is, how do they reconcile a different outcome of some of the above, like XXY chromosomes, or XY chromosomes, with a hormonal level indicating female? Just how do they determine the gender of a participant? The meat and two veg method? 1
Popular Post The Old Bull Posted Wednesday at 03:32 PM Popular Post Posted Wednesday at 03:32 PM 11 hours ago, WDSmart said: I suggest (AGAIN!) that if there are only two categories of activities, one for males and one for females, whoever runs the operations should define how they determine gender. Is it just taking the contestant's word for it? Do they require a birth certificate showing gender? If a test is required, is it: a physical examination? chromosomes? hormones? some combination of the three above? And if it is, how do they reconcile a different outcome of some of the above, like XXY chromosomes, or XY chromosomes, with a hormonal level indicating female? Just how do they determine the gender of a participant? Not too difficult just take a peak under the skirt see if there is anything hanging. 1 1 1
howlee101 Posted Wednesday at 04:05 PM Posted Wednesday at 04:05 PM Where are all the stories of transgender men competing, and dominating, in men's sports? 🤔 1
GanDoonToonPet Posted Wednesday at 05:23 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:23 PM 2 hours ago, Harrisfan said: Have a Trans olympics. Who's allowed to compete in the non-trans olympics?
Tug Posted Wednesday at 08:41 PM Posted Wednesday at 08:41 PM 8 hours ago, JonnyF said: Indeed. But we have to remember that the left are always very selective about which science they follow, and invariably get it wrong. You have been selected to give it the old trump grab them by the privates pat down,when you wake up let us know ok?
bendejo Posted yesterday at 01:35 AM Posted yesterday at 01:35 AM Always with that big ladyboy smile.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now